Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: re: I am adopted &… remain legally entitled (despite cancer diagnosis & Brexit) to my free of charge court recording of what -I- said in British High Court in London on 21st June 2010 (Lord Neuberger, BBC et al later ‘sidestepped’ in July 2010 etc that Jan Luba illegally used to become ‘judge’) because politicians et al did not want me to… speak for myself in ‘controversial’ adoption case (involving monarchy & supposed ‘land law’) Commonwealth did not want to ever go to ECHR in EU or be remitted back to civil… jury despite fact most people would agree there should be… International Civil Court for civilians with… choice of juries (25.11.2022)
The politicians cannot legally stop people the state labels ‘adopted’ (which is not how I would describe or label what really happens) ever having a genuine… choice to say NO to adoption and draconian adoption legislation.
That reality is how I found myself standing on the witness stand in the High Court in the Royal Courts of Justice on 21st June 2010 trying to speak for myself which no-one wanted me to do, and was a truly traumatic experience to essentially be forced into doing.
(I couldn’t walk into Parliament Square, Central London without the British government knowing exactly who I was because I was essentially raised by government agencies. It is a political lie that the privacy of someone labelled adopted is ever respected by… politicians)
*The latest Australian PM and Victorian State Premier were in state and federal governments in 2010, too* (and they did know what happened in April 2008 & June 2010 in London in the UK)
The British Parliament caused all the problems with NSY and the BBC illegally leaking my adopted name on Mothers Day 26th March 2006 with other false information, before Blair was grandstanding to the Australian Parliament on 27th March 2006 instead of resigning, because if the BBC had illegally leaked my real name of Donna Bugat (with false information trying to pretend a civil lawsuit from me could be turned into a criminal case against me) it would have been even easier for anyone to identify the government were illegally trying to stop civil… jury lawsuits.
The BBC should obviously have always called me by my real name of Donna Bugat (and accept I have the legal right to a genuine… choice to say no to adoption and draconian adoption legislation):
Blair et al obviously knew:
No-one could ever say it was my ‘fault’ my adopted name was illegally leaked.
It is clearly perfectly legal for someone labelled adopted to take back control of our own lives by renouncing adoption and draconian adoption legislation in much the same way some people like Johnson renounce citizenship instead.
The Australian politicians like Downer illegally tried to use the adoption label and draconian adoption legislation to illegally try and say in 2006, that I wasn’t an Australian citizen !! (Australian politicians have always wanted me to renounce Australian citizenship and not draconian adoption legislation which is why I was sent overseas as a teenager):
The ‘two veterans’ and so many political lies:
(It should go without saying, monarchy cannot simply rubber stamp legislation they personally and financially benefit from)
I don’t need to waste my time over ‘whether or not’ Lord Justicd Neuberger, the BBC or Jan Luba ‘sidestepped’ what I said on 21st June 2010 in the Royal Courts of London in July 2010 etc (which they clearly did illegally do) because I… remain legally entitled to the court recording of what -I- said on 21st June 2010 they ’sidestepped’ in July 2010.
The political lies of the disgraced British former PM and Mayor of London Johnson (whose ‘wingman’ was really the so called Labour Leader of the Opposition ‘Sir’ Kier Starmer who was DPP in the ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation now repealed era) did not age well with time:
I… remain (despite cancer diagnosis and Brexit) legally entitled to have a copy of the court recording of what -I- said on 21st June 2010 free of charge.
The ‘news’ media couldn’t even get all their tall tales straight in July 2010, that unravel with a court recording from 21st June 2010 of what -I-said:
The legal records show the BBC had lied about Mothers Day 2006 and the State Opening in 2010, before their lies in July 2010 (etc) when it was agreed Johnson could not legally ‘overtake’ me in courts.
The now ‘Judge’ Luba (from Garden Court Chambers who were ‘professionally embarrassed’ by myself and others forcing the repeal of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 they only grandstanded over) did not IN FACT or law, represent me (and Harris from Starmer’s Doughty did not represent me either – I did not know, and had never met, spoken with or given my instructions to either) so no-one could ever say I had done anything ‘wrong’ on for example 21st June 2010 that led to my being illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010:
The disgraced Johnson was hiding my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 (over state violence) and… disclosure of the CCTV of the premeditated torture and attempted murder of me that could obviously easily have been sent to me … by email:
There isn’t a member of the British judiciary who do not know all about the scandal in Westminster about what appeared on the face of it to be the most controversial scandal over land law involving the monarchy. The monarchy had reason to believe the for example GLA Act 1999 might be repealed too.
The legal reality is the disgraced Johnson (regardless of whether he posed as a journalist for the Barclay Brothers, or boss of top cops or the monarch’s gardener, all while posing as Mayor of London) could never legally go ‘around’ or ‘overtake’ my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 etc over Mothers Day 2006 etc.
It’s self evident the phoney human rights lawyer called Jan Luba, who I had never even met or spoken to ever including before he also dishonestly publicly purported to represent Brian and myself (hiding behind the false cover of ‘land law’) which he could not possibly legally do, while also representing the not so Democracy Village (who were really what is colloquially known as ‘Westminster Village’) when Luba did know (just like the BBC did) the supposed Democracy Village that Brian and myself were nothing to do with) had literally been involved in orchestrating the unlawful arrest of me at the State Opening in 2010.
The disgraced Johnson hid that by the time he tried on round two of his land farce I had already really won (for example) HQ11X00563.
I would know the only way Luba (who obviously could not legally represent Brian and myself while for example representing the so called Democracy Village which the BBC kept… lying about) became a judge was by covering up what -I- said on 21st June 2010 which he was completely compromised over, and ‘professionally embarassed’ by (It wasn’t Luba who for example raised the issue of the also ‘professionally embarassed’ monarchy):
I was the one standing on the witness stand in the British High Court in London on 21st June 2010 who saw when I started to try and speak… for myself, a whole line of lawyers… including Luba stand in unison, who did not want me to speak… for myself.
(It’s quite common, but illegal, for politicians to try and join ordinary civilians, with agents of the state who are paid to try and lose what are political cases. A United States governor in Florida called deSantis (from the Iraq War & Gitmo when he essentially followed orders from Democrats like Delaware’s Biden who also voted for the Iraq War) recently tried to copy Johnson et al in the UK over Parliament Square in Central London with… legislation in Florida in the United States trying to essentially illegally ‘join’ different groups of people together in legal proceedings)
Lord Neuberger was professionally compromised because he was directly involved in illegally claiming the adopted label could be used to separate siblings and send the ones labelled adopted overseas out of British ‘jurisdiction’.
The Blair years saw Lord Neuberger punish vulnerable children without law, with the label ‘adopted’ when he was directly involved in illegally separating siblings and sending some siblings overseas out of the ‘jurisdiction’ (or so Neuberger et al claimed) of the UK (despite Blair pretending to complain about children being labelled adopted and brought to the UK from the United States:
Lord Neuberger did reasonably know it wasn’t the adults who were being ‘inconvenienced’ if they had to spend some time in the UK when he helped separate siblings and send some of those siblings overseas.
The real legal point Lord Neuberger et al ‘sidestepped‘ in that different controversial adoption case was politicians et al hide someone labelled ‘adopted’ (even with the erronously ‘freed for adoption order’) do not recognize anyone labelled adopted has a genuine… choice to say no to adoption and draconian adoption legislation:
I have no idea… where Lord Neuberger who was clearly fond of political theatre obtained his law degree, that was maybe simply an honorarium given to him by someone, or that he found in a packet of cornflakes ?
**I know there were no legal grounds for my being raised separately from my little sister with the same parents in Australia, when my parents automatically aged out of now defunct legislation used against them that resulted in my being labelled ‘adopted’ while it was claimed I could never automatically age out of draconian adoption legislation, and choose free universal and unlimited health care, anywhere instead**
It could never have happened if there had been an… International Civil Court for civilians with the choice of civil juries, that could for example be based in Jerusalem.
The politicians, press and courts were falling over themselves to stop my case involving adoption (and monarchy) ever going to the ECHR and/or being ‘remitted’ to a civil jury.
The British monarchy may purport to be head of state of many still far from Commonwealth countries (which looks seriously weird when you have spent time living in a republic) but the reach of the cruelty of adoption goes even further, and does include republics.
It is very shocking that politicians in Australia deliberately falsified government records to try and falsely claim (behind my back) I own property in Australia to intentionally try and also make me homeless in Australia and abandon my own home in Breizh, France… solely !! to try and keep buying votes using the adoption label, that very seriously also resulted in my getting cancer.
I don’t need to waste my time arguing ‘whether or not’ politicians put themselves buying votes with the label adopted, before my physical and emotional health, and whether that seriously damaged my health.
The… ‘authoritarianism’ is others arbitrarily imposing the label adoption in the first place, and not someone labelled adopted saying no to being labelled adopted and draconian adoption legislation.
I genuinely loved hearing the most extraordinarily beautiful symphony of birdsong I have ever heard anywhere, in my very own nature lovers paradise in Breizh, France.
The cancer diagnosis has complicated my life even more, in many ways, but I would still quite like to spend some more time peacefully living in my own… home in Breizh, which is in an autonomous region in France. I could for example also entirely legally base a political party in my own home, that campaigned for the UK to rejoin the EU. I obviously think both British and Commonwealth politicians along with EU politicians have behaved very badly over both adoption and Brexit.
The transfer of people labelled adopted in very distressing circumstances, from ‘jurisdiction’ to ‘jurisdiction’ to ‘jurisdiction’ highlights the need for an International Civil Court for civilians with a… choice of juries.
Most people would agree there should be an… International Civil Court with the choice of juries, that could be based in Jerusalem, so that the label of adoption cannot be arbitrarily imposed to transfer people between ‘jurisdictions’ for political reasons.
In my heart of hearts, I would like to see an International Civil Court for civilians with the choice of civil juries that could be based in Jerusalem.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 