Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Re: cancer & Premier of Victoria does not deny my British High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 & CCTV of premeditated political torture & attempted murder of me etc, guarantees me a genuine… choice to renounce political lies of draconian adoption legislation & receive compensation incl. presumptive free & unlimited universal health care anywhere instead (ie: refer Blair et al 26th & 27th March 2006 etc) (18.11.2022)
The politicians have always illegally refused having accurate and contemporaneous court records made and kept about adoptions.
The Victorian State Premier has never denied that I am as someone labelled adopted by others as a vulnerable child, free to make my own… genuine choice to legally renounce draconian adoption legislation, regardless of where I live, and receive compensation including the presumption of free unlimited universal health care cover.
It should never be possible for politicians to buy votes by exploiting vulnerable child they label adopted who cannot vote, who they hand over to adults who can vote which politicians clearly financially profit personally from doing that has led to the global multi-billion dollar racket of adoption. It is self evident that the fact politicians do not want to stop buying votes using vulnerable children labelled adopted has resulted in draconian adoption legislation that is all about whatever suits politicians and has nothing whatsoever to do with anyone labelled adopted ever having any…genuine choices.
The two Blair’s & Murdoch’s New Scotland Yard & BBC lie on 26th March 2006 Mothers Day :
I don’t personally care what lies politicians, state broadcasters and robber media barons spin about what they call adoption so long as I can as someone labelled adopted as a vulnerable child by others, freely exercise my absolute legal right to say no to and reject their lies by renouncing draconian adoption legislation and receiving compensation including presumptive unlimited universal health care anywhere instead. The fact some people may choose be labelled adopted by others has never provided legal grounds to permanently arbitrarily impose draconian adoption legislation on anyone. There is the legal… presumption that politicians who denied vulnerable children they labelled adopted any possible or timely access to genetic medical information, means being entitled to free unlimited health care anywhere.
The legal reality is Blair who has always been a false profit representing the likes of the Oxford ‘PPE’ (Politics, Philosophy & Economics) of I am okay Jack/he who has the most money brigade incl. Murdoch et al wins, was legally obliged to resign on Mothers Day 26th March 2006, instead of grandstanding in front of the Australian Parliament on 27th March 2006.
This was a load of old cobblers Blair et al publiahed in the UK, to actually try and protect the Murdoch ‘reputation’ (ie: the phoney philanthropist spin about Murdoch’s ‘Mommie Dearest’ in Australia who it so happens was directly involved in facilitating the illegal adoption of me):
The idea that Blair has ever cared about peaceful freedom of expression or democracy anywhere for civilian populations was shown to clearly be untrue when he waged war on Iraq which no longer had the inequality of monarchy, while violently attacking peace campaigners in the UK too.
Blair was legally obliged to resign on Mothers Day 26th March 2006, instead of grandstanding for the Australian Parliament on 27th March 2006 (there was an adoption ‘history’ around Olympics too):
Blair was… still legally obliged to resign on 5th September 2006 after the horrific attacks on myself and Steve Jago incl. on 4th September 2006:
Blair et al faced a further unprecedented problem because the legal records show the politicians were undeniably trying to illegally avoid a legally binding ruling in the High Court that the Magistrates Court were legally obliged to keep an accurate and contemporaneous record of legal proceedings which they Magistrates Courts refused to do. A barristers opinion in one of my cases from 22nd Februray 2006 had already made the serious accusation that the same District Judge changed his reasons when challenged to provide a case stated that he had not done, let alone in a timely way by March 26th 2007 because it was clearly unlawful to use ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 (now repealed) to arrest people:
Another Murdoch ‘Law Report’ hiding, there was nothing ‘inadvertent’ about politicians wanting to… illegally stop an accurate and contemporaneous record of legal proceedings being made in the Magistrates Court (which is directly related to the refusal of politicians to keep an accurate and contemporaneous court record of adoptions):
The fact unscrupulous politicians will exploit vulnerable children also means politicians like former Australian PM Rudd will use the corruption of the global multi-billion dollar adoption racket to horse-trade vast financial deals for themselves, like the $1.4 billion dollars he was given by the British Tories. It’s undeniable the true reason a Court of Appeal had to remit a malicious prosecution brought against me by the fmr disgraced British Mayor of London & PM Johnson in the High Court, back to the High Court in 2010 was because no-one wanted to for example provide the transcript or court recording of the first five minutes of what I said on the witness stand on 21st June 2010. This was along with my then being illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010 (when Rudd and Gillard began their revolving doors too) before people I had already legally named in court as posing as protesters while really working for Johnson et al gave the High court the excuse to illegally close the court to the press (who like the Daily Mail admit they were involved) along with closing the court to the public.
This load of old cobblers from Murdoch ‘Law Reports’ about the Court of Appeal does not bear any resemblance to any transcript or recording of what I said in the High Court on 21st June 2010 that it is matter of fact, no-one denied or argued against:
The whole GLA omni-shambles originally arose from the Department of Transport. I seriously doubt the monarchy genuinely thought they could rubber stamp the GLA Act 1999 to give themselves part of Parliament Square, which is why I pointed out they had sought title deeds for themselves in 2008.
A former Head of ACPO, a Sir Ken Jones bought himself a meal ticket out of the political scandal surrounding adoption, heading off from the by then seriously scandal ridden MET Police in the UK, where Commissioner Blair had been forced to resign too, to quelle no surprise, Victoria as DAC where he planned to transfer to IBAC to gate-keep his own corruption !! where he relied on my never returning to Australia to question how he intended to come about Australian citizenship. Murdoch does not mention the scandals in the UK police before Jones arrived in specifically Victoria in Australia.
The Brit Johnson (who was in 2010 still significantly a dual national American while also being paid vast sums of money by the Barclay Brothers at the Daily Telegraph while he was also boss of the top cops) et al al illegally hid I really won satellite litigation in for example HQ11X00563 in January 2011 before any remitted hearing of his malicious prosecution in 2010 when he was in any event stopped from claiming any costs because it was agreed he was illegally trying to ‘overtake’ lawsuits against him and the British government. The public should never have had to pay Johnson’s legal costs for the malicious prosecution he brought against me using people posing as protesters who also worked for the likes of the Daily Mail.
** No-one ever denied, disputed or ever contested what I managed to say on 21st June 2010 while on the witness stand in the High Court in the UK**:
The BBC illegally hid the real headline was I was unlawfully arrested at a State Opening on 25th May 2010 by the same AI Cole who was in legal terms a stalker who was already involved in my lawsuits about him having covered up my being punched in the head by a male, Labour & Tory politicians refused to identify in August 2008 which led to my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order on 16th April 2008 and the subsequent refusal of the British government to then hand over the CCTV of the inextricably linked premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me.
The BBC et al knew what they published (to also cover up for example the illegal use of violent agent provocateurs Johnson did not include in his malicious prosecution against Brian and myself) was not an accurate and contemporaneous record of what -I- said when -I- was unlawfully arrested (after I had much earlier commented on both our own and police video and incl. in writing there was no court order for any of the illegal searches, but of course I did have a High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order):
Johnson’s Village of phoney protesters he illegally sought to ‘join’ with Brian and myself to bring a malicious prosecution (who the DM also admit outside legal proceedings) worked with the likes of the DM:
I obviously don’t need to waste my time arguing about whether or not someone wearing the phoney numbers 666 in the City of London on 10th April 2013 after I had been in the High Court, was a police officer acting in the execution of his duty. The government were illegally trying to stop me leaving the country because they knew there were no legal grounds stopping my own lawsuits against them being resolved by email. The British government had illegally demanded I go in person to the High Court on 10th April 2013 instead of agreeing anything by email.
It’s not like the British governments City of London brief who had no legal authority to impose anything on me, had never heard of sending CCTV… by email:
I don’t need to waste my time arguing over “whether or not” this was acting in the execution of any public duty (where I should never have been forced to be in the same room/court as a City of London lawyer who was illegally refusing to hand over CCTV to me that could easily have been sent to me…. by email):
I could never and was never legally obliged to return to Australia to renounce draconian adoption legislation. The Victorian State Premier could at most argue against my British High Court Habeas Corpus High Court Order etc in Europe but he didn’t. He could not legally stop me leaving Australia, and living in my own home in Breizh, France, during the global pandemic while falsely claiming I owned property in Australia to try and hide what he was doing. The State government illegally use draconian adoption legislation to trespass on supposed Federal authority by in practice illegally stopping someone labelled adopted from travelling or living overseas with a passport in our own identity. The fact some people may choose to be labelled adopted and go along with draconian adoption legislation does not mean it can be imposed on anyone who does not.
I don’t need to waste my time arguing over “whether or not” politicians ever cared about the physical and emotional health of someone they labelled adopted because they illegally legislated to permanently hide any genetic medical information from a cohort of people they labelled adopted. The politicians recklessly caused me prolonged stress and distress by illegally stopping me living in my own home in Breizh, France during a global pandemic while falsely claiming I own property in Australia, all because politicians care more about buying votes.
The Victorian State Premier has not provided any legal grounds as to why someone adopted in Victoria, Australia cannot renounce draconian legislation anywhere, and including in my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 in the UK (when the latest Victorian Premier was posing as a health Minister)
The Liberal Opposition MP and historical revisionist, called Bach (who like Gove in the UK) claims to be adopted which may or may not be true given the propensity of politicians to say they can lie about whatever they like (and are both on the Murdoch payroll) is a grub who actually participated in the abuse of me during the 2010 general election in the UK (where he falsely gives the impression he helped the Tories to win, because it was actually a hung parliament because the Lib Dems lied about student fees so politicians could make their own backdoor deals)
The previous Liberal MP for Eastern Metropolitan region called Ms Wooldridge (who unlike Bach was actually elected before they sat in his now Victorian electoral seat) dodged the question of compensation linked to renouncing draconian adoption legislation with the old job for mates appointment to an obviously under-performing ‘gender equality’ quango, much like Rudd’s former ‘media adviser’ called McKenzie inveigled herself within a ‘civilian role’ in Victoria Police. It was clearly seriously reckless of police (acting on behalf of the Police Minister/s et al) to resort to pushing around an old women with cancer using a walking stick, just because I understandably want to renounce draconian adoption legislation and get on with my own life.
I really should not have had a former Rudd media adviser (while I was in Parliament Square, Central London) who then ‘inveigled’ her way into a civilian role in the Victoria Police trying to then pile in on me too !! (allegedly on behalf of the Victorian Attorney General who was not in that role when I was in Parliament Square, Central London)
I don’t need to concern myself about “whether or not” a Ms McKenzie has an undeclared conflict of interest because I would know she does:
Those involved in the revolving doors of politics typically don’t change much over time, because they simply re-invent themselves in a different role, where they consistently oppose proper checks and balances and safeguards to protect civilian populations.
One of the obvious reasons political corruption occurs and is perpetuated in somewhere like Australia is because outside of courts, there is no alternative of a corruption body that deals with both state and federal political corruption despite the legal reality there is so much overlap with the same political parties at state and federal level.
The latest Premier is of course going to shortly be in breach of his own legislation about making trams accessible for people with mobility problems too by 31st December 2022, because there are a number of tram routes in Melbourne that don’t even have a single accessible tram on their entire route for people with mobility problems. So many people with mobility problems have to struggle with massive steps to even get on a tram, and not just when they are on holiday. It is impossible to believe politicians who first and foremost pretty much only care about property ‘developers’ will bother having billions of pounds of transport infrastructure, being user friendly when they don’t even bother in the here and now, with having trams that are more accessible for people with mobility problems.
I believe the true reason the Victorian State Premier (who is really a closet monarchist) claims to want to privatize the electricity industry is because the latest British King who has never really been genuinely interested in renewable energy, wants to personally profit from off shore wind-farms in Victoria, just like he wants to in the UK where the monarchy personally claims ownership of twelve nautical miles of sea-beds. The British monarchy have never cared about cheaper energy prices for any civilian population, and indeed our own solar panels we used in Parliament Square, Central London were stolen and destroyed by the government.
I remember after I was diagnosed with cancer in Australia, and when I was advised by the hospital I had been referred to (and had been released from the oncology ward a few days earlier) to immediately call an ambulance and come directly back to the hospital on 10th September 2022 (when I was struggling to breathe, and stay conscious because the tumorous cancer was haemorrhaging) I then didn’t have the time to wait for an ambulance, so I had to try and save my life by then arranging a taxi instead. I was clearly so seriously ill and completely incapable of managing the dramatic progression of the cancer by myself outside of any hospital environment which is why an urgent major operation had to be scheduled at short notice. It seemed dreamlike that while I was in the A& E (before being re-admitted to the oncology ward) a surgeon had appeared and said she might have to do an operation she had not done and the hospital had not done, which she explained in some detail (I am unable to repeat myself) if they could not slow the haemorrhaging, all of which I could not really process because I was so ill. When I later asked another doctor about that the doctor said they did not approve that. I remember being given extra blankets and hot packs to help keep me warm, because I felt so cold. I then had blood transfusions so it would also be possible for me to have the major operation to remove the 9cm cancerous tumour (doctors in the A& E had thought the bleeding out could be related to part/s of the cancer breaking off) and it turned out the major operation included also removing a significant number of internal organs. Of course the extremely rare combination of an internal organ being in the wrong location (an anatomical anomaly) that wasn’t removed, which happened to be in the same location as the cancer I was diagnosed with (which was removed) proved ‘challenging’ for surgery and any other treatment, including because of course there are no agreed or established treatments based on outcomes. It was at least fortunate that I had known about the anatomical anomaly when a CT scan etc had been done in 2019 for the autoimmune pancreatitis and rheumatoid arthritis etc) It turns out, the occurrence of the anatomical anomaly (which is usually genetic) at the same location as the cancer is so rare there are only several reported cases, albeit involving different types of cancer.
The fact I got cancer following the prolonged stress and distress caused by the abusive political problem of draconian adoption adoption legislation only confirms to me the URGENCY for someone labelled adopted by others, to be able to freely renounce draconian draconian adoption regardless of where we live. It has been extraordinarily difficult for me to try and manage any part of being diagnosed with cancer because I wasn’t living in my own home in Breizh, France, which if it had happened there at all, would have been at least diagnosed earlier. It is agreed by everyone that the political free for all of Brexit has further complicated any ability to have proper access to healthcare. The circumstances of my being diagnosed with cancer while being illegally stopped from living in my own home, including during a global pandemic has had very serious consequences for me, including it taking me much longer to even try to recover from a major operation when I was supposed to get home help outside the hospital, which couldn’t really work in my circumstances.
It is absolutely unlawful for politicians to cause prolonged stress and distress to someone they labelled adopted for their own personal financial gain as politicians.
I have zero interest in the choices Bach and Gove make about their own alleged adoptions, and they have zero right of any kind to try and stop other people labelled adopted like myself from a genuine choice of renouncing draconian adoption legislation, and having free unlimited universal health care instead.
There are no legal grounds that could possibly mean I need to wait for the agreement of any politician, public official or court to have the… genuine choice to renounce draconian adoption legislation the Victorian State Premier is legally obliged to confirm is included in my British High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 etc.
A kinder world is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 