Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Re: My cancer & request for appointment with French embassy to formally confirm being forced by politicians to effectively involuntarily abandon my home in Breizh France (where I have not been able to live since July 2019) after exiled from UK because lawsuits about adoption not settled (compounded by Brexit’s irresponsible political free for all) while politicians financially profit from using vulnerable children arbitrarily labelled adopted by draconian adoption legislation to buy votes etc (11.10.2022)
I will need an appointment with the French embassy to formally discuss the combined effect of the political circumstances that have effectively forced me to involuntarily… abandon my own home in Breizh France, since July 2019.
The blood transfusion dependent cancer:
The combined effect of a) adoption, leading to my being b) exiled by the British government from the UK in 2013 to avoid c) jury lawsuits being settled (I had been forced to sell my home in the UK in September 2006 because lawsuits from Mothers Day 2006 ie: HQ11X)0563 & HQ12X03564 were not settled in a timely manner) along with the d) irresponsible manner of the political Brexit free for all (where politicians signed an unwieldly political agreement among themselves, that even they do not agree) regardless of civilians legally accrued rights, or any serious intended or unintended consequences for civilians (it is not credible that I would for example be able to access any continuing British government health entitlements in the EU) has resulted in politicians effectively forcing me to abandon my home in Breizh (which I have been stopped from living in since July 2019) before I was diagnosed with blood transfusion dependent cancer and recently had a major operation etc etc.
O pos:
It is self evident that politicians use vulnerable children labelled adopted to by votes politicians personally financially profit from because it is only legally possible to have care arrangements vulnerable minors automatically age out of at adulthood, The true legal reality is we accrued in our own identity and right any additional nationalities and citizenships. It is clearly unreasonable, as my case shows for someone who was adopted in one country and lives overseas, in essentially a third country, and is already a dual national (and not necessarily as portrayed in the adoption) to need to return to the country of adoption to pay money to and have the permission of a court who never even gave an adopted person a copy of the adoption court order, to use our own identity. I do not need to justify myself to anyone else, because I was always entitled to make my own decisions as an adult. It is clearly easier for example to get married in one country and divorced in another !!
A reminder of family and my home in Breizh ( I grew some of the same flowers):
It seems to me that the only way the injustice of draconian adoption has been able to persist is because politicians illegally stop anyone labelled adopted who does not go along with draconian adoption legislation from putting a signed and dated witness statement on the court record in the adoption case, as either a child or adult.
The idea of tissue donation is quite a good idea too (and you can opt out of certain uses):
A kinder evolution is possible.
(The Advanced Care Directive):
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 