Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: My cancer operation & fact politicians et al have illegally stopped my asserting my absolute legal right to provide signed witness statement for court record in Case 352 etc because it peacefully nullifies injustice of draconian adoption legislation (it would have inevitably been disclosed in UK etc that Australian Murdoch matriarch & dame was in my own case, involved in my adoption) (30 September 2022)
——
The central legal point is politicians et al have illegally stopped me from asserting my absolute legal right to put a signed witness statement on the court record in Case 352 because that peacefully nullifies injustice of draconian adoption legislation.
—-
Notes:
I have provided a medical certificate to a relevant government department so that the fact I was diagnosed with cancer by/at the same time I received an email from a Ms McKenzie from the Victorian government dated 7th September 2022 (presumably because 7th September 2013 was an election day in Australia in 2013 that I did not personally vote in) is now formally recorded because of course the former Australian PM Rudd’s own McKenzie ‘friend’ (a Ms McKenzie) who previously posed as his Deputy Chief of Staff (media) has ‘overlooked’ that reality.
The former Deputy Chief of Staff (media) for a former Australian PM Rudd:
In fact, it is noted Ms McKenzie has illegally failed to disclose in an EMAIL dated 7th September 2022 to me, her conflict of interest (which she would need to do in court proceedings) because she previously worked as Deputy Chief of Staff (media) to a former Australian PM Rudd when I won HQ11X00563, before she accepted what is presumably another political appointment in the Department of ‘Justice’ in Victoria while now working for Victoria Police. I am of course critical of whoever happens to be the Victorian Police… Minister. In my own case, a Ms McKenzie through her previous employment, predates a number of politicians like for example the Victorian Attorney General.
It’s not however so different to me, from the fact the Australian Murdoch matriarch and dame did not want my case ever heard in any court with a jury in for example the UK or Australia because she would be ‘embarrassed’ by the fact it would inevitably come out, it so happens she was in her not so ‘philanthropic’ role involved in the illegal adoption of me. The whole Murdoch involvement in adoption is not personally very interesting to me.
The fact politicians will exploit vulnerable children who cannot vote to buy votes from adults who can vote, does not make draconian adoption legislation legal.
The Department of Justice in Victoria, has contrary to the ill informed claims of Ms Mckenzie, never respected the privacy !! of any adopted person (you only have to know about the ‘sixth schedule’ birth certificates which specifically identified an adopted person as such including to any foreign government while of course Murdoch knew because of his mother et al) and indeed my adopted name was illegally leaked by the BBC and what was Murdoch’s New Scotland Yard at the time on Mothers Day 2006, with what was false information to try and stop civil jury nullification of legislation.
The email dated 7th September 2022 was… deliberately factually incorrect because I have repeated on numerous occasions I have never stopped and there has never been any legal obstacle for the manipulative Adoption ‘Information’ Service (except possibly incriminating themselves ??) providing me by EMAIL with what they claim is their complete set of records relating to my adoption.
There’s a lot of victim blaming by politicians, and media barons that goes on towards people like myself who refuse to comply with draconian adoption legislation because the likes of Murdoch would like to be able to blame me in some way for being adopted as a vulnerable child, to distract from their own family involvement in essentially the slave trading business now called adoption.
My observation is there are many women who are beholden to a few global robber media barons who not only happen to be all male (which is quite odd when you think about it) while they do not even promote equality of opportunity for all. The robber media barons have presumably historically benefited from a tradition of male inheritance.
The fact is it is courts who have always refused without lawful excuse to provide a copy of the adoption court order to the person it applies to, even as an adult, which has only ever been done to illegally stop someone labelled adopted by others as a vulnerable child from legally challenging the court order. The politicians have always shown reckless disregard for the right of someone labelled adopted to even know they are adopted.
I cannot find any other example/s of legal systems refusing to provide the person who is subject to a court order with a copy of the court order which is really why there is such ‘obfuscation’ at the AIS & DOJ because it is clearly illegal for politicians to legislate to do that.
It must be accepted that politicians have been reckless with the health of people labelled adopted who do not accept being labelled adopted.
It is undeniable the wider legal problem is that politicians et al have been illegally stopping my putting a signed witness statement on the court record in for example Case 352. There are no circumstances where it would be legal to stop someone labelled adopted as a vulnerable child by others, from putting a signed witness statement on the court record, including as an adult, refusing to comply with draconian adoption legislation.
A reasonable, rational and responsible adult knows a government only has lawful authority to use the…. least intrusive state interference possible which means that vulnerable children automatically age out of care arrangements as adults.
The fact some people may want what are highly unusual adoption court orders to continue forever into adulthood does not make it legally possible to impose such draconian adoption court orders on anyone.
The fact it is possible for an adult who was subject to care arrangements that are for a small cohort of children called adoption can instead pay money as an adult to go to court to try and justify whatever private arrangement they may want as adults makes the completely unnatural use of such highly unusual draconian adoption court orders all the more inexplicable.
I learned enough (indeed more than I would like to know) about the political machinations behind legislation, when I was in Parliament Square, Central London because so many government departments and then the for example monarchy who had told Brian and myself they were going to prosecute us which I reasonably believed would be illegal for them to do (over ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 that we forced off the statute books) then cynically had Johnson front a malicious prosecution of Brian and myself instead with a distraction about an alleged trespass in part of Parliament Square (called the gardens the Blair Labour administration claimed they could give to the monarchy despite it not having been part of Labour’s published manifesto to give away valuable public land to the monarchy) In our own case it is transparently clear the monarchy were trying to claim free tax payer funded legal representation !! before I pointed out it was in any case, illegal for government departments and/or the monarchy to try and…. overtake my/our lawsuits from Mothers Day 2006 and of course the fact I won HQ11X00563 in January 2011.
This omnishambles that went no-where, was transparently essentially about the monarchy and Johnson the journalist wanting free !! unlimited tax payer funded legal representation for themselves (which didn’t change our forcing ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 off the statute books):
I wasn’t personally interested in any supposed ‘land claim’ by the monarchy in Parliament Square (there are many republics and monarchies who have draconian adoption legislation) because it was the government and courts who tried to confine me to Parliament Square after the Crown Court ridiculously said it was “my home” in 2007 simply because politicians et al didn’t want me to campaign anywhere else but had planned to roll out the ss 132-138 legislation across the country) The former Australian PM Rudd who only cares about himself, and never about any Australian citizens anywhere, couldn’t explain why I was illegally denied legal representation in the British High Court on 23rd June 2010 at the same time he began his revolving doors between being PM & FM. There is obviously no way Rudd would have got a $1.4 billion dollar brown envelope from for example British Tories except by hiding Mothers Day 2006 and my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 and the fact I won HQ11X00563 in January 2011 etc etc. The politicians only falsely claim they have modernised adoption legislation because all they have really done is pay off a few obliging members from the cult of ‘celebrity’ who always want free publicity.
It is legally inexplicable for politicians to claim they can legislate to try and claim someone labelled adopted by others as a vulnerable child, has to pay money to and have the permission of a court to extricate ourselves from something we have never agreed to and could not possibly, including without our knowledge continue into adulthood.
There is no reasonable explanation as to why draconian adoption legislation continues when there is a far less intrusive state interference that can… legally work for everyone.
It is for any adult who wishes the care arrangements from their childhood to continue into adulthood with the supervision of the court to pay money to and go to court to justify that. It is not legal for the reverse to happen whereby politicians claim people who were labelled have to pay money to and have the permission of courts to live our own lives. It is not legally possible that such draconian adoption court orders could have legally continued into… adulthood in any circumstances.
There could not possibly be any legal doubt the unreasonably prolonged stress and distress caused by draconian adoption legislation caused my cancer.
The State of Victoria have been reckless in not providing a reasonable legal route that someone living overseas who was originally adopted in Victoria could follow to safely extricate ourselves from adoption, including without returning to Australia, because the draconian adoption legislation is so unreasonable it not only completely ignores the legal problems caused by the unnecessary legislation, but seeks to arbitrarily… punish an adopted person who does not agree with being adopted or just go along along with draconian adoption legislation . Whenever there is a problem caused by politicians draconian adoption legislation, politicians just pretend it is not happening.
The fact it is by comparison far easier to get divorced without needing to return to the country you got married in, while no-one loses any nationalities and citizenships because of the divorce, says it all really about the highly unusual and illegal discrimination created by the endless… uncertainty of draconian adoption legislation.
The politicians cannot legally legislate that someone could not live in their own home as an adult because they refuse to be adopted, yet that is the sort of political threats and political abuse someone labelled adopted by others have to endure if we do not just go along willingly with draconian adoption legislation regardless of any harm it causes.
The politicians knew I was being caused very serious stress and distress when I went along to the County Court in July 2021 about getting an injunction over adoption before I was the physically assaulted by police on 21st December 2021 for no other reason than because politicians are illegally stopping me from asserting my absolute legal right to put a signed witness statement on the court record in Case 352 etc. The Victoria Police Minister then had police shamefully push me around and assault me in 2022 when I was seriously ill with cancer and using a walking stick which was reckless beyond belief. Another police officer actually said he could refer me for legal representation which I said I did not believe he would do and of course never happened. I openly pointed out I was legally entitled just like the police officers, to an Australian passport in my own identity without needing to first pay money to and having the permission of a court that they did not have to do.
The very serious abuse of draconian adoption legislation is and has been ‘normalised’.
Nevertheless, the cancer overtly manifested itself after I was admitted to the A&E of a hospital on the 20th August 2022, and the diagnosis of cancer was made on 23rd August 2022. I made and had signed, an Advance Care Directive a few days later.
I was then while the necessary referral was being made hospitalized again by the cancer in a different hospital on 30th August 2022. I never even made it as far as to what was supposed to be the first ‘official’ appointment with a medical team on 12th September 2022 because shortly after being discharged from hospital in early September 2022 while being prepared for meeting a medical team and undergoing an operation, I was re-admitted to hospital again through the emergency department.
On 10th September 2022, I caught a step-on tram from almost outside my accommodation and briefly went two stops along to some shops nearby to pick up a couple of things, when I suffered what became a catastrophic bleed caused by the cancer. It took me about 45 minutes before I was physically able to get on a step-on tram and travel the two stops back to accommodation. I managed to get off the tram but then started vomiting too, so I had to sit at a tram stop for about fifteen minutes before trying to walk again which I was finding difficult because of the anaemia and haemoglobin going south because of blood loss caused by the cancer. I managed to get back to the accommodation across the road, but none of the array of medications I was by then accumulating from doctors, helped stop the cancer bleeding out. So I rang the hospital who told me to immediately call an ambulance and to come to the hospital.
I realized shortly after calling the ambulance that my situation was suddenly deteriorating more quickly than I had realised or could manage so I would not have the time to wait for an ambulance, because I was not only having difficulty breathing or standing, but I suddenly felt I was starting to slip out of consciousness. So I asked the accommodation to urgently get a taxi because I didn’t have time to wait for an ambulance and so I was helped to the taxi and the taxi driver got hospital staff to help me out of the taxi because I could not even walk by the time we got there, although the hospital was nearby.
The medical professionals told me that I had done everything I could possibly have done to try and get to medical treatment, because what happened obviously traumatized me and was extremely distressing.
I remember when I was being treated firstly in the A&E department of the hospital just willing the clock to move forward past the 10th of September, because that is the same date my little sister I was raised separately from died, all of which was obviously very distressing. It was around midnight when I was moved from the A&E department back on to the ward I had been released from a few days previously. I vaguely remember a Registrar asking me to sign to have blood transfusions, which I then had over the next two days, but quite a lot is just a distant blur. A medical team came to see me and basically said they could not wait to do any further tests etc so they were scheduling an urgent major operation that took place a few days later on the 14th September 2022. The medical team removed what turned out to be a 9cm cancerous tumour, along with quite a few significant internal organs and some lymph nodes during the operation, before they reached the limits of what they were able to do within their operating time frame. There was a perplexing unforeseen complication, which would still pose a problem for any further cancer treatment.
All in all, there was a lot going on, from being diagnosed with cancer and being in and out of hospital before then having a major operation, all within a month, so I am now just doing my best to recover for now, from what I can. Most people would understand my mind hasn’t really caught up with/processed what has physically happened to me in the past month because so much was going on and happening so quickly.
Who caused me completely unnecessary…. distress on 7th September 2022 ?
I missed out on celebrating and enjoying becoming an adult and making my own adult decisions because of politicians selfish Peter Pan Never-neverland of draconian adoption legislation.
It’s fair to say that the events of the past month have personally taught me that the prolonged stress and distress caused by draconian adoption legislation really is just so…. unreasonable. People have enough to cope with in our every day lives without what is the… bullying from draconian adoption legislation.
The politicians should not take…. advantage of my being seriously ill to try and further delay my asserting my absolute legal right to put my signed witness statement on the court record in Case 352 because it will nullify the injustice of draconian adoption legislation.
One of the hardest things has been not being in the familiar surroundings of my own home in Breizh, France which was just not possible in my own circumstances. It has made me realize that politicians need to consider that where people who have been adopted in for example Victoria, Australia and then live overseas, politicians must be legally obliged to provide either compensation if people want to return to Australia to live with our real identities in a home of our own in Australia, or provide an exemption from assets like a house overseas being included in our having public housing in Australia because it is politicians who have unreasonably created so much… uncertainty with the draconian adoption legislation that includes politicians threatening and stopping me living in my own homes overseas. In my own case it is now not just the politicians and draconian adoption legislation that could stop me permanently living in my own home in Breizh, France, but now the fact of cancer and medical treatment too.
The politicians have made my own home in Breizh, France, effectively worthless to me if I cannot safely live there with my own identity.
I personally very much appreciated that all the doctors and nurses in hospital were happy to call me Donna which surprisingly to me, made EVERYTHING so much easier for me, because it gave me some long overdue…. respite from the daily unreasonable grind of stress and distress caused by draconian adoption legislation that I do personally feel and could only feel in all the true circumstances caused the cancer.
At the moment I am doing my best to recover from a major operation, and would obviously very much benefit from politicians recognising such a simple fact that I can peacefully assert my absolute right to have my signed witness statement about draconian adoption legislation on the court record in case 352.
I have more than enough to do trying to recover from cancer and a major operation etc while trying to move on with my own life which includes my own identity.
To be honest I would like to see an International Civil Court in Jerusalem, that could oversee court orders about care arrangements vulnerable children must automatically age out of at adulthood.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 