Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Minister/s for Services Australia & Centrelink etc are legally obliged to immediately acknowledge FUNDAMENTAL legal right of person labelled adopted as a vulnerable child, to… automatically age out of draconian adoption legislation at adulthood because I am as an adult legally entitled to make my own decisions, without being forced to return to Australia and pay money to and have the approval of a court in Australia etc etc (11.08.2022)
Sent: 11 August 2022 06:38
To: dp&c@dpc.vic.gov.au <dp&c@dpc.vic.gov.au>; Gannon, Andrew <andrew.gannon@police.vic.gov.au>; ACT-Information-Access@afp.gov.au <ACT-Information-Access@afp.gov.au>; general@tpav.org.au <general@tpav.org.au>; Anthony Carbines <anthony.carbines@parliament.vic.gov.au>; minister.carbines@dffh.vic.gov.au <minister.carbines@dffh.vic.gov.au>; robin.scott@parliament.vic.gov.au <robin.scott@parliament.vic.gov.au>; daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au <daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au>; tim.smith@parliament.vic.gov.au <tim.smith@parliament.vic.gov.au>; spectator@ipgmedia.com.au <spectator@ipgmedia.com.au>; preston.housing@dhhs.vic.gov.au <preston.housing@dhhs.vic.gov.au>; Clare.Lawson@launchhousing.org.au <Clare.Lawson@launchhousing.org.au>; Consular Paris <consular.paris@dfat.gov.au>; principalregistry@supcourt.vic.gov.au <principalregistry@supcourt.vic.gov.au>; commercial.registry@countycourt.vic.gov.au <commercial.registry@countycourt.vic.gov.au>; sanja.biondic@justice.vic.gov.au <sanja.biondic@justice.vic.gov.au>; commonlaw.registry@countycourt.vic.gov.au <commonlaw.registry@countycourt.vic.gov.au>; HaveYourSay <haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk>; info@ccrc.gov.uk <info@ccrc.gov.uk>; sr-torture@ohchr.org <sr-torture@ohchr.org>; Adele Teh <adele.teh@humanrights.gov.au>; Partnerships Addressing Disadvantage (DTF) <pads@dtf.vic.gov.au>; childprotectionsubpoenaunit@health.vic.gov.au <childprotectionsubpoenaunit@health.vic.gov.au>; crogers@hcourt.gov.au <crogers@hcourt.gov.au>; lisa.neville@parliament.vic.gov.au <lisa.neville@parliament.vic.gov.au>; njc@courts.vic.gov.au <njc@courts.vic.gov.au>; admin@courtnetwork.com.au <admin@courtnetwork.com.au>; info@ibac.vic.gov.au <info@ibac.vic.gov.au>; media@ibac.vic.gov.au <media@ibac.vic.gov.au>; Supreme Court-Redcrest <redcrest@supcourt.vic.gov.au>; admin@adopteerightsaustralia.org.au <admin@adopteerightsaustralia.org.au>; senator.wong@aph.gov.au <senator.wong@aph.gov.au>; danny.pearson@parliament.vic.gov.au <danny.pearson@parliament.vic.gov.au>; enquiries@fls.org.au <enquiries@fls.org.au>; Amanda.Rishworth.MP@aph.gov.au <Amanda.Rishworth.MP@aph.gov.au>; Minister.Rishworth@DSS.gov.au <Minister.Rishworth@DSS.gov.au>; minister.shorten@dss.gov.au <minister.shorten@dss.gov.au>; bill.shorten.mp@aph.gov.au <bill.shorten.mp@aph.gov.au>; julie.collins.mp@aph.gov.au <julie.collins.mp@aph.gov.au>; Justine.Elliot.MP@aph.gov.au <Justine.Elliot.MP@aph.gov.au>
Cc: vicreg@fedcourt.gov.au <vicreg@fedcourt.gov.au>; FL General Enquiries <enquiries@fcfcoa.gov.au>; communications@hr4a.com.au <communications@hr4a.com.au>; info@rk.com.au <info@rk.com.au>; foleys@foleys.com.au <foleys@foleys.com.au>; admin@untoday.org <admin@untoday.org>; jchr@parliament.uk <jchr@parliament.uk>; Customer Help <customer.help@theguardian.com>; tips@7news.com.au <tips@7news.com.au>; casei@lancaster.ac.uk <casei@lancaster.ac.uk>; gth25@cam.ac.uk <gth25@cam.ac.uk>; gth25@cam.ac.uk <gth25@cam.ac.uk>; subpoena-service-smu@police.vic.gov.au <subpoena-service-smu@police.vic.gov.au>; VP WEBSITE-MGR <vpwebsite-mgr@police.vic.gov.au>; info@global-counsel.com <info@global-counsel.com>; dataprotection@hja.net <dataprotection@hja.net>; cblanden@vicbar.com.au <cblanden@vicbar.com.au>; Support <support@apm.net.au>; a.downer@kcl.ac.uk <a.downer@kcl.ac.uk>; ces74@cam.ac.uk <ces74@cam.ac.uk>; boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk <boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk>; poldep-citizens@europarl.europa.eu <poldep-citizens@europarl.europa.eu>; media@pmc.gov.au <media@pmc.gov.au>
The politicians cannot legally claim in any court, it is legally possible to use draconian adoption legislation against me as an adult.
It is commonsense that politicians cannot legislate to force people to call adult strangers parents including for life, while having the right to our own identity completely erased forever by politicians kafka-esque draconian adoption legislation. There are very serious legal issues about politicians trying to force someone labelled adopted to lie about our true identity. The record keeping by governments over adoption is just abysmal because politicians simply have no… respect for adopted people, so the politicians have never cared about the truth about the lives of adopted people being properly recorded by courts.
In particular it is absolutely unlawful for politicians to use draconian adoption legislation to try and… delay compensation that would not have been necessary if politicians had acknowledged people who were labelled adopted have always been legally entitled to automatically age out of draconian adoption legislation at adulthood. It is not legally possible for politicians to claim a single cohort of people politicians labelled adopted (an adopted person is legally entitled to call what has happened trafficking) could not automatically age out of the state imposed care arrangements at adulthood just like any other person in out of home care does.
It is clearly legally problematic for politicians to try and obscure the legislative sleight of hand of draconian adoption legislation by falsely claiming an adopted person can be forced to return to Australia and pay money to and have the permission of a court to be free from draconian adoption legislation. By way of analogy it is worth pointing out it was simpler and more straightforward for me to get married in New Zealand to a New Zealander (I was personally wary about collecting any more government pieces of paper because of adoption) and divorced in the UK without needing to return to New Zealand, while one son was born in the UK and one son was born in New Zealand, and both are also Australian citizens who have never lived in Australia specifically because of the very serious problems caused by draconian adoption legislation.
The fact politicians have always lied to adopted people because politicians have known people are legally entitled to automatically age out of care arrangements as adults means that people who have been labelled adopted by draconian adoption legislation do qualify for basic compensation generally with additional compensation in specific cases.
(It did beggar belief that I was recently asked by a private company employed by the government, to waste my time filling out a patronizing, paternalistic condescending box ticking form that asked me to identify ‘the pronouns’ I wished to be identified by !!)
There are very serious legal problems with the fact an adopted person is bounced between state and federal government departments trying to continue to impose draconian adoption legislation that people are led to believe is a state responsibility despite the federal, national and international legal consequences. Ministers for Services Australia & Centrelink have considerable declarable conflicts of interest regarding draconian adoption legislation, and indeed includes paying money to adults who adopt in circumstances where they are not known to the people who pose as parents, while at the same time discriminating against an adopted person by falsely claiming people do not automatically age out of draconian adoption legislation as adults.
*It’s not a good look that Services Australia & Centrelink did not refer me for… legal aid and yet Victoria Police told me they could and would refer me to legal aid, albeit I am skeptical about them saying that after my having been subjected to such prolonged physical and emotional harm by draconian adoption legislation. It is clear I need a… social worker to try and help me manage so many medical issues involving autoimmune and related illnesses that have worsened because politicians are illegally stopping me living in my own home in Breizh, France.
**There is no reasonable doubt the British PM Johnson orchestrated the premediated political torture and attempted murder of me while he was Mayor of London and boss of top cops, to try and hide I should have automatically aged out of draconian adoption legislation as an adult. I obviously clearly own the CCTV that was secured and exists of the premediated political torture and attempted murder of me**
It is not sustainable for politicians to legally maintain that adopted people do not… automatically age out of draconian adoption legislation at adulthood.
***There have never been any legal grounds stopping Australian politicians ensuring I was paid Centrelink or Disability Pension while I was living in my own home in Breizh, France, and before any wider compensation was agreed*** The Federal Ministers for Services Australia & Centrelink have declarable conflicts of interest with regard to the fact draconian adoption legislation originates in states yet adopted people are expected to somehow manage when it is state politicians illegally using draconian adoption legislation to stop an Australian passport being issued in my own identity which has all sorts of adverse legal consequences such as stopping me living my own home, or having freedom of movement.
It is self evident that politicians gave absolutely no consideration ever to properly recording not just information about the name of an adopted person, but the actual nationalities and citizenships of the person being adopted and those of adult strangers posing as parents. The decisions about what nationalities and citizenships someone labeled adopted wanted to use, could only be the choice of the person who was adopted, who do after all often have our own children and families too.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 