Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: I reasonably believe I have Default Judgement against draconian adoption legislation politicians have never had any recognised defence in law to use before they… already illegally hid my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 & CCTV of premeditated political torture & attempted murder of me over Mothers Day 2006 nullification of legislation in UK, because they know I have always been legally entitled as an adult to make my own decision to have a replacement Australian passport in my own identity & to live in my own home in Breizh, France, without needing to return to Australia either to pay money to & have permission of any court which has instead led to continuing physical harm being caused to me with politicians intentionally making me homeless in Australia & using Victoria police to bully, harass & assault me (03.08.2022)
The Victorian politicians and public officials prefer to distract from and ignore what they are actually doing in the here and now, that… physically harms members of the public, who politicians have never cared about, with politicians endless supposed internal squabbling over factions and sponsors.
I genuinely stood for peaceful freedom of expression for everyone in Parliament Square, Central London and in so forcing ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation off the statute books because politicians had no recognised defence to jury nullification of that legislation, meant the legal reality was, I did the same with draconian adoption legislation because I am adopted. The EU could only have referred my case back to a civil jury.
It’s not a ‘good look’ that politicians… already tortured and attempted to murder me because I am adopted and draconian adoption legislation is ‘void ab initio’.
The politicians have manipulatively sought to distract from the fact they have never had any legal standing to legislate draconian adoption legislation in the first place by portraying themselves (and those they have used and played to adopt vulnerable children) as saviours, with false promises they knew they could not legally make, while illegally portraying innocent adopted people who are naturally entitled to our rights like anyone else as ungrateful etc etc.
It was never legally possible for politicians to legislate beyond legally reviewable care arrangements vulnerable children automatically age out of at adulthood. It is not legally possible for draconian adoption legislation to be imposed on or used against an adult.
The people like Murdoch’s journalist turned politician Gove in the UK, who claims to be adopted, or the Liberal Party in Victoria’s Dr Bach who also claims to be adopted and was recently parachuted in to cover up another Liberal MP Woolridge had not agreed compensation when they did the phoney ‘forced adoption’ spin with Labour & Gillard could clearly as adults if they had wanted paid money to and asked for the permission of courts to have whatever legal arrangement they are really seeking to have overseen by a court that could not be imposed on other adults with draconian adoption legislation. There are no legal grounds to impose draconian adoption legislation on some people demanding we put our lives on hold because some other adopted people want draconian adoption legislation to continue, because they have alternative options for them to instead pay money o and have the permission of courts for their own tailor made agreements.
It is seriously not okay that I am for example assaulted !! by Victoria Police so the likes of politicians like Gove and Bach can continue to spin draconian adoption legislation for their own…. political advantage because draconian adoption legislation is a… political not legal policy.
There are simply no legal grounds for draconian adoption legislation that could never be imposed on an adult.
The Fairfax news media continued to deliberately mislead the public in 2018 when they portrayed adopted people in Australia could discharge or revoke adoption court orders, because they knew the real purpose of legislation in Victoria in 1984 was that politicians were trying to avoid lawsuits, by illegally illegally trying to force adult adopted people to first agree draconian adoption legislation is legal if they want to discharge an order etc etc.
The Fairfax news media also knew (like Murdoch who knew I was adopted when I was in Parliament Square, Central London) that there is no due process in draconian adoption legislation and that adopted people like myself who a) lived outside Australia could never have been legally obliged to return to Australia to pay money to and have the permission of a court to end our adoption (I was for example as an adult married in New Zealand and divorced in the UK without needing to return to New Zealand) b) also had nationalities and citizenships changed too, which courts never even bothered to properly record because they never kept accurate and contemporaneous records anyway, and is not a simple case of a quiet word with a judge in chambers.
The reality is politicians stepped beyond the boundaries of legislative power and created all sorts of legal problems for many people who were adopted that along with the news media they typically try and gloss over. The Australian politicians have sought to distract from a multi billion dollar global industry in what they call adoption (that an adopted person is legally entitled to call trafficking) with their weasel words about ‘stolen generations’ and ‘forced adoptions’ that suggest ‘past practises’ do not continue. The Adoption Information Service in Melbourne in the Department of Justice are not the friends of adopted people. They continue to spin whatever soundbite suits politicians on any given day while in fact nothing has changed because they use the…same draconian adoption legislation. The Gillard government did not speak for all adopted people and did not have the authority to claim politicians could decide what counselling people might have access to, which has ignored that for counselling to actually be effective the trauma of draconian adoption legislation needs to have concluded and it has not.
I was forced to leave Australia as a teenager because I refused to go along with draconian adoption legislation, before I am now as an adult being pushed around and assaulted by Victorian Police at Southern Cross Station because I still refuse to comply with draconian adoption legislation.
The British have already over-egged the pudding on the trespass front to hide the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me that happened with the connivance of Australian politicians, because draconian adoption legislation is void ab initio. The big tough politicians were falling over each other to abuse me, but the British PM Johnson was squeamish when it came to handing over the CCTV of the premeditated torture and attempted murder of me. The British PM Johnson never had legal immunity over the premeditated torture and attempted murder of me that took place when he was Mayor of London and boss of top cops, and the so called Leader of the Opposition Starmer was the DPP. Murdoch’s less than accurate law reports in the Times ‘overlooked’ I actually ‘won’ HQ11X00563.
There are obviously no circumstances where it is legal for a politician to use public office to maliciously prosecute a member of the public, to try and cover up their premeditated political torture and attempted murder of that member of the public where they are hiding the CCTV:
I remember I was literally kidnapped from a court in the UK during live proceedings at South Western Magistrates (involving Murdoch too) on 19th July 2007 because a) the government wanted to stop me giving evidence, before the CPS later conceded Special Branch et al had put in place a sequence of events that only recklessly put my life at risk b) Westminster Magistrates had to hurriedly remove a bogus ‘Community Order’ a District Judge Snow had illegally imposed on both myself and Steve Jago, because we had never agreed to the Community Order being imposed and our agreement was needed for the ‘highly unusual’ Community Order (that illegally sought to stop our peacefully campaigning in Parliament Square) to be imposed that was being questioned by judges in other courts like Camberwell in London earlier that week because I had malicious prosecutions related to ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 moved out of Westminster because of bias and prejudice. Steve and I won the ‘decisive’ legal ‘victory’ over all sorts of malicious prosecutions, on 13th December 2007 at Southwark Crown Court.
The legal point is that just like our agreement that we did not give, was needed by a court to impose the bogus Community Orders related to ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005, it is not legal to arbitrarily impose such highly unusual adoption ‘court orders’ on an adopted person without ever having the agreement of an adopted person, that is never even sought. The entirety of draconian adoption legislation is in conflict with the peace and harmony of the rule of law.
There was no legal difference in the UK between Blair, Brown, Johnson, Cameron, May, Starmer, Livingstone and then Corbyn who never supported peaceful freedom of expression for everyone and all supported ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 being illegally used against Brian and myself. The likes of Corbyn and Galloway never spoke out against their very own Livingstone using ss 132-138 SOCPA 2008 against Brian and myself, while the unions including not just the likes of the Brexit backing RMT, but the Police Federation had been given an exemption from the legislation. The treachery of Westminster politicians towards members of the public generally is quite appalling, but at least now with the Tory and Labour parties both vying for the same limited Brexit vote while ignoring the rest of the at least half of the electorate who did not vote for whatever politicians wanted Brexit to mean, has resulted in there clearly being the space for an entirely new political party in the UK.
The Victorian Police Minister sent police to bully, harass and assault me in Southern Cross Station in July 2022 in the knowledge I should never have had to leave my own home in Breizh, France and return to Australia, only to be subjected to such foul abuse and discrimination because I am adopted. The Victorian police understood they were discriminating against me because they knew I could not just go to the passport office and get a passport like they could, because the politicians falsely claim I need to first pay money to and have the permission of a court to use my own identity and live in my own home in Breizh, France, which police knew could not possibly be true, because I pointed out I am and adult who is legally entitled to make my own adult decisions like anyone else, that I should have been able to do while living in my own home in Breizh, France. I do not believe the Victorian Police were honest about referring me for legal aid because they acted illegally towards me themselves and knew they should never have been near me. It was not okay for a police office to push me to either try and a) get me to retaliate so he had an excuse to maliciously arrest me, because I was clearly not committing a trespass, or to b) hope that he caused me to fall over, so I was injured or hospitalised which would obviously suit politicians.
The politicians have illegally failed to properly record the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me which has meant my continuing to be harassed, and having to repeat what has happened which should have originally been taken very seriously, but wasn’t because I am adopted and the problem is draconian adoption legislation which is void ab initio. The reality is it is very cowardly of Johnson to orchestrate the dirty deed and then try and hide what he is legally responsible for doing. I now know there was an agreement between the Labour and Tory politicians that was articulated when Murdoch recklessly published Cameron saying on 19th July 2009 on Sky News he wanted to illegally “remove” us without any caveats on how that was done, that was intended to give Johnson the green light, because of course people were falling all over each other to collect.
I told the Victorian police how politicians have illegally refused to hand over a computer printout for me to give to a court where they falsely claimed I “own property in Australia” because they were trying to hide their illegally stopping my living in my own home in Breizh, France, while intentionally making me homeless in Australia to cause me physical harm. I explained to the police I was in a lot of physical pain being caused by politicians illegally stopping me from living in my own home where I can lie down and rest so that I can try to get better, instead of the politicians currently still adversely affecting my health for no legal reason. T
he problem with being adopted is politicians and public officials… begin by creating fraudulent records there is no incentive for them to… stop doing.
I do personally advocate for politicians to provide proper shelter for homeless people who’s health is unnecessarily being harmed by political policies because the reality is I know myself I had nowhere to go when I was a teenager who properly refused to comply with draconian adoption legislation, so th people who posed as my parents and god parents were able to send me overseas o ge me out of the way because they knew I hadn’t don anything wrong. The politicians should open up a space in Southern Cross Station overnight for homeless people or open up the quarantine centre at Mickleham for homeless people to come and go from, because homeless people… can include adopted people of any age being abused by the state, because there are no legal grounds of draconian adoption legislation.
The reality is politicians cannot continue to impose draconian adoption legislation because it simply cannot be imposed by politicians on an adult who is legally entitled to make our own decisions without first paying money to or having the permission of a court who imposed a highly unusual court order without ever bothering to ask for or have our agreement anyway.
There are the individual facts in each and every case that politicians who have arbitrarily imposed what is a political rather than legal policy, lumped together as the job lot they call adoption, so huge sensitivity is needed so adopted people can actually make our own decisions in our own time in often impossible situations. There are often no easy answers for an adopted person who has also often been subject to so much hostility and conflict caused by the policy of politicians that there would otherwise not be, because politicians have used draconian adoption legislation to play people.
It is unlawful of politicians to subject me to further what is serious physical harm that is being caused by stopping me living in my own home in Breizh, France, because I clearly need lots of rest to try and recover from just the physical harm caused from stopping me living in my own home, along with the known fact of my having multiple auto-immune and related illnesses. The Victorian police knew I was in serious pain and I blame the Victorian Police Minster who is just another Johnson who just illegally used his political position to abuse me when he was Mayor of London and boss of the top cops there.
The legal reality is politicians draconian adoption legislation cannot just be arbitrarily imposed on anyone.
The politicians in Victoria (like Mr Pearson who has not produced the computer printout of politicians lies about my housing) are legally obliged to agree TODAY for them to pay for me to have accommodation of my choice in Melbourne, because it is illegal for politicians to make me homeless, while my travel documents are arranged, and to agree compensation with me so I can safely live using my own identity, in my own home in Breizh, France, free from draconian adoption legislation.
It is not okay or legal for ANY politicians in Victoria to publicly continue pretending they can impose draconian adoption legislation.
The Victorian Police Minister does not reasonably believe any Victorian Police officer could stand before a jury and claim I could be discriminated against by politicians using draconian adoption legislation to say I cannot make my own adult decisions.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 