Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: The politicians know they have made me seriously ill at the moment, thanks to their intentional & criminal negligence & all of which they are taking advantage of, because it obviously makes it extremely difficult for me to try and manage very serious legal issues because politicians did not stop illegally using draconian adoption legislation while I was living in my own home in Breizh, France (08.07.2022)
I know that draconian adoption legislation is the problem, because I know that without the use of draconian adoption legislation, I am free of the worst political persecution.
The politicians know they have made me seriously ill at the moment, thanks to their intentional & criminal negligence & all of which they are taking advantage of, because it obviously makes it extremely difficult for me to try and manage very serious legal issues because politicians did not stop illegally using draconian adoption legislation while I was living in my own home in Breizh, France.
The politicians and courts have created ‘ambiguity’ between state and federal politicians about their supposed responsibilities with regard to draconian adoption legislation which creates and extends to ambiguity about the role of state and federal police too.
My personal view is politicians really need stop using such illegal draconian adoption legislation that has absolutely no due process.
It is deeply offensive and insulting for politicians to claim the absurdity of their nonsensical draconian adoption legislation that has clearly never had anything to do with child protection means a grown adult needs to pay money to and have the permission of a court to even have an Australian passport in my own identity. It is completely unacceptable for my freedom of movement to also be at the whim of politicians using draconian adoption legislation.
It would be obvious to any reasonable adult that it is not possible for me to manage my serious physical health issues while politicians are continuing to use draconian adoption legislation to intentionally try and make me homeless.
My physical health is more important than politicians draconian adoption legislation.
It is undeniable that politicians illegally stopped me living in my own home in Breizh, France so they could also stop me having access to proper medical treatment in Australia. I know this is true, because I recently discovered politicians had since 20th November 2020 been lying with their claim I “own property in Australia” so they could illegally stop me having emergency or over 55 accommodation in Australia while intentionally making me homeless, because they cannot also explain why their are illegally stopping me living in my own home in Breizh, France.
It cannot be legal to make such a draconian court order against someone without that person always having access to legal representation, and the only reason there isn’t that legal representation there must be to impose and continue such a draconian court order, is because politicians do know these extraordinary court orders cannot in any circumstances continue to be used against adults.
The politicians know that proper shelter and healthcare are linked.
I don’t care that politicians have never cared about the problems created by their draconian adoption legislation. What matters is politicians taking responsibility.
The reality is there is no reasonable prospect of my getting proper medical treatment in Australia, and my physical health is suffering because politicians have intentionally made me homeless in Australia too.
I did not voluntarily return to this country, and politicians do not take any responsibility for the inevitable problems there are with their reckless draconian adoption legislation. It’s not good enough that they want to use draconian adoption legislation but without the person the court order is made against having any legal representation.
The British and Australian politicians & Murdoch et al did reasonably know they were illegally trying to ‘overtake’ my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 and they would reasonably know it is illegally to also maliciously try and prosecute me to try and cover up the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me:
The politicians are not however allowed to “possess” people.
The politicians and press who recently witter on with their sudden supposed opinions about the British PM Johnson, who has not actually resigned, have never personally been maliciously prosecuted by him because he was illegally trying to cover up my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 nor have they experienced anything like the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me. The British PM Johnson and the Russian government may now say they are not good friends, but I am sure they would agree they were good friends in 2010, which remains true with Vitol anyway. In any event, they are all united in the use of draconian adoption legislation, I am understandably completely opposed to.
I would never have been in the situation I was in the UK, except for the use of draconian adoption legislation, that politicians were able to exploit.
It would be illegal for politicians to try and hide the County Court Order from 28th May 1963 in my own Case 352 (which politicians do routinely do, because their draconian adoption legislation does not even make it mandatory for someone labelled adopted to be given a copy of the court order made against them)
So it must therefore be an actual… crime for British and Australian politicians to illegally try and cover up and overtake my inextricably linked High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008. After all, how many ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Orders do poliiicians claim I would need ?
The politicians know they cannot make extraordinary court orders that continue into adulthood against a cohort of people they label adopted as vulnerable children. There is nothing stopping people who as adults want to pay money and go to a court to ask for a court order against themselves, but the peace and harmony of the rule of law does preclude politicians interfering with anything other than legally reviewable care arrangements vulnerable children automatically age out of at adulthood.
It’s illegal to stop me living in my own home:
It really should not be such a big deal for me to live in my own home in Breizh, France, free from draconian adoption legislation. It is unreasonable to try and force someone to comply with draconian adoption legislation that has only harmed them.
If the politicians took responsibility for their draconian adoption legislation they would have had the good manner to make the effort to confirm in wiring by email to myself and the Victorian Police Commissioner that they cannot arrest or prosecute me inside or outside any court because I refuse to ‘comply’ with draconian adoption legislation which has only eve caused me prolonged harm.
I will now need an emergency court hearing because politicians don’t care what they do.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 