Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: The politicians illegally stopped me living in my own home in Breizh, France in July 2019, to intentionally try & stop me having access to proper medical treatment I am unable to get in Australia because politicians have since 20th November 2020, lied about my living arrangements to also intentionally try & make me homeless, to also further adversely affect my physical health, because they cannot explain away my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 over jury nullification of legally unjustifiable draconian adoption legislation, on Mothers Day 2006 in the UK (06.07.2022)
I reasonably believe that what politicians and robber media barons call adoption is actually a… crime, because they show such reckless disregard for any harm caused by what they call adoption, just like they did with ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 we forced off the statute books.
The legal records prove the two Blairs PM & top cop, along with the BBC knowingly lied because their personal ambitions got in the way of the truth:
The nullification of draconian adoption legislation including by a civil jury was always going to happen because there is ‘no recognized defence in law’ for draconian adoption legislation.
The Murdoch Law Reports in the Times, that… hides everyone was trying to illegally overtake my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order, is not a great improvement:
It is impossible to deny that Johnson’s entire career while a journalist, Mayor of London, Foreign Secretary & PM who did undeniably maliciously target me, for purely political reasons, was based on illegally covering up my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 he could not simply explain away. Johnson has had the benefit of an unusually high number of ‘special advisers’.
** The politicians only illegally stopped me living in my own home in Breizh, France so they could also intentionally make me… homeless in Australia (which is why politicians have since, 20th November 2020 lied and falsely claimed I “own property in Australia” to try and justify stopping me having any either… emergency or over 55 social housing) while also illegally restricting my access to proper medical treatment which the Australian politicians could not have sustained, while I was living in my own home in Breizh, France. **
** IT IS CLEAR I WAS NEVER GOING TO HAVE ACCESS TO PROPER MEDICAL TREATMENT IN AUSTRALIA WHILE POLITICIANS HAVE ACTUALLY BEEN LYING (BEHIND MY BACK SINCE 20TH NOVEMBER 2020) ABOUT MY LIVING ARRANGEMENTS !! (which I did not know about until 20th May 2022) BECAUSE THEY ARE… INTENTIONALLY MAKING ME HOMELESS TO FURTHER ADVERSELY AFFECT MY PHYSICAL HEALTH **
*** The politicians are deliberately ignoring the very serious issues about my access to proper medical treatment ***
The breach in the public trust by politicians is very serious.
It is self evident that I was unlawfully arrested inside and outside a County Court in Melbourne on 21st December 2021 because I legally refuse to comply with draconian adoption legislation that has always caused me life threatening physical and emotional harm.
It is the politicians who have always illegally hid the existence of what is my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006 because they cannot simply explain that away.
**** I am legally entitled to be living in my own home in Breizh, France with access to proper medical treatment, free from political interference ****
I already have what is legally a Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008, so I am not the one who has to fill in any forms in Victoria, Australia or elsewhere, to legally justify my refusal to comply with draconian adoption legislation that has only ever caused me prolonged physical and emotional harm.
The latest British and Australian PM’s could not change the legal reality of my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 that confirmed the jury nullification of legally unjustifiable draconian adoption legislation on Mothers Day 2006 regardless of the malicious prosecutions of me that were intended to cover that up, along with the premeditated torture and attempted murder of me.
The successive Australian Labour and Liberal PM’s Rudd, Gillard and Abbott have all lied about draconian adoption legislation as does the latest State Premier and Leader of Opposition in Victoria, along with Murdoch et al.
Most people know self serving politicians put their own personal ambition and that of their political party and then those who vote for them, before the best interests of all law abiding private citizens, and in particular vulnerable children.
It is not legal for politicians to claim that draconian adoption legislation means that unlike people who are not labeled adopted, I need to have the permission of a court to have an Australian passport in my own identity.
It is politicians who have no choice but to acknowledge that I am as someone labeled ‘adopted’ by others, legally entitled to refuse to comply with draconian adoption legislation, including because I do not by refusing to comply with draconian adoption legislation, commit any known or published civil or criminal offence.
There are no circumstances that make draconian adoption legislation lawful.
The people who were genuinely misled by politicians when they adopted children would not blame adopted people for not being grateful, or want an adopted person arrested for refusing to comply with adoption legislation, while those that do, are only those who have been cruelly exploiting vulnerable children anyway.
The politicians messianic ‘saviour’ mentality about adoption, is like slavery was, dishonestly premised on supposedly ’helping’ people who the state finds it useful to consider in one way or another to be ‘inferior’. In the case of what politicians call ‘adoption’ highly unusual lifelong adoption ‘court orders’ are illegally used because they are not in any way connected to child protection. The politicians draconian adoption legislation is an… interference that is not legally justifiable in any circumstances. The use of draconian adoption legislation produces highly unusual court orders that are not based on the individual facts of any family law case, but rather a political policy of deliberate state interference, that involves the commodification and commercialization of vulnerable children. The reality that adoption court orders which are intended to be forever, do go far beyond any possible scope politicians or courts could have with regard to child protection does mean the court orders do themselves represent the commodification and… commercialisation of vulnerable children (which are openly promoted by for example the United States and Russia) for… political ends because it is not possible to legitimately… buy such extraordinary court orders.
The legal reality, that the only legal alternative to draconian adoption legislation is legally reviewable care arrangements vulnerable minors automatically age out of at adulthood will also protect vulnerable children from being procured by government departments who will try and exploit them, like the highest echelons of the British and Australian intelligence services, who posed as my parents and godparents. I was… sent away from Australia as a teenager precisely because I refused to comply with draconian adoption legislation.
I prefer learning about my own real family history that includes my Italian Mediterranean heritage that was completely hidden from me. The other family members who have lived in Australia include some who were either English and from Tower Hamlets, Southwark and Holborn in London, or from Devon and Cornwall with one great, great, great grandparent born in Charleston, South Carolina in the United States during the War of Independence, or they were from County Clare and Galway in Ireland and emigrated during the potato famine etc.
The politicians and robber media barons are wasting everyone’s time continuing to try and promote the inequality of monarchy, when it is clear most people would support an International Civil Court with the choice of juries that could be based in Jerusalem and oversee legally reviewable court orders vulnerable children automatically age out of at adulthood.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 