Donna Bugat -v- Anthony Albanese (ALP) & James McGrath (LNP) at Court of Disputed Returns in High Court, Australia : I am clearly not doing anything ‘wrong’ asserting my absolute right as an Australian citizen to immediately have an Australian (incl. now diplomatic) passport in my own identity regardless of wherever I live that means the end of draconian adoption legislation incl. unlawful interference by politicians falsely claiming I need their ‘permission’ & the manipulative political excuses of Albanese & McGrath who (along with Johnson & Rudd) have only become & remained politicians by illegally ignoring… basic disclosure over Mothers Day 2006, my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 & the CCTV of the premeditated political torture & attempted murder of me (08.06.2022)
I have always considered my own life to be quite separate from that of the adult strangers who posed as my parents when I was a small child. I had always known I was not being raised by my own family although the state illegally lied to me about the true facts and circumstances of that on the basis more generally that their claiming possession of vulnerable children served their own political purposes.
I knew I was living with adult strangers doing a job where none of us ever really pretended to be a family, so I had no false expectations of it being a family. It was always clear that the people from the highest echelons of the British and Australian intelligence services who posed as the parents and godparents of myself, and my adopted brother, had their own families and then their family including other members of the intelligence services, all of which I never sought, or wanted to be a part of. Their lives were obviously completely different to mine because they had made their decision as adults to be paid employees of all the secrets and lies of intelligence services. The British minister and Murdoch journalist Gove was a complete and utter idiot when he tried to compare being adopted as a vulnerable child to being like a spy because clearly nothing could be further from the truth. The people who posed as my parents said they accepted my decision to refuse to join the intelligence services, eventually saying it was the correct decision. My priority was entirely naturally having my own identity, which… politicians have illegally made into a political struggle about what they call adoption ‘court orders’. The people who posed as my parents had no reason to care about my having an Australian passport in my own identity, and there was never any identifiable legal reason for any adoption ‘court order’ continuing into adulthood including not only without my agreement or permission, but expressly without my agreement.
There is no legal reason why I would recognise draconian adoption legislation as legitimate because it serves no legally justifiable purpose.
Most people understand politicians do not have any legal right to try and stop an Australian citizen having an Australian passport in my own identity.
When I discuss that reality with ordinary people they completely understand that, so it raises the question about what is the real purpose of such discriminatory and draconian adoption legislation because most people also understand that whether politicians like it or not when someone is an adult we are all equals, and politicians cannot… permanently impose what they call an adoption ‘court order’.
The politicians and their publicists don’t tell people about what the ‘highly unusual’ permanent adoption ‘court orders’ mean. I cannot legally be punished for refusing to go along with draconian adoption legislation that has always been about political power not child protection.
The only reason politicians are illegally trying to stop me asserting my absolute right to as an Australian citizen have an Australian passport in my own identity, is because that means the end of draconian adoption legislation (and adoption ‘court orders’) which is more than anything I could ever hope to do as a politician.
It is politicians who have the legal responsibility to return to the courts and make reasonable legally reviewable court orders vulnerable children automatically age out of at adulthood, instead of parotting “nothing else but (what politicians call) adoption will do”.
I am clearly doing nothing wrong in asserting my absolute right as an Australian citizen to immediately have an Australian (incl. now diplomatic) passport in my own identity regardless of wherever I live, that means the end of draconian adoption legislation and politicians falsely claiming I need their ‘permission’.
The undeniable facts are Albanese & McGrath who (along with Johnson & Rudd) have only become & remained politicians by illegally ignoring… basic disclosure over Mothers Day 2006, my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 & the CCTV of the premeditated political torture & attempted murder of me.
I completely, utterly and absolutely refuse to support politicians who covered up violent attacks on me including by a male assailant they illegally refused to identify.
It is self evident that being an Australian citizen is not contingent on being a constituent of any politician, and indeed Australian citizens will not aways be a constituent of any politician because we live overseas, which does not change the fact that all politicians have a legal duty first and foremost to the peace and harmony of the rule of law.
The Court of Disputed Returns only have the legal authority to remit the case back to a Supreme Court jury to agree financial compensation if that is disputed because Albanese and McGrath obviously do not have any recognised defence in law to put before a civil jury, about their ignoring basic disclosure so they could become and remain politicians by intentionally harming an entirely innocent civilian who is an Australian citizen. It is well known the commercial adoptions in the United States, Russia and Ukraine are about people who want white children. It should be remembered that the former Australian FM Downer who illegally tried to use draconian adoption legislation to try and deny I am an Australian citizen, and the British and former American ‘financier’ Browder do not and have never supported adopted people… anywhere actually having any rights. I remember a truly pig ignorant monarchist in Westminster called Ms Karen Lewis who actually wrote in a witness statement no-one ever wanted to see the light of day before any civil jury, that she wanted me arrested because I criticised the monarchy, saying that if I didn’t like the monarchy I should “go back to wherever she came from” which was so pig ignorant because it ‘overlooked’ a) the fact I was legally entitled to challenge ‘highly unusual’ legislation by the ummm… monarchy and mayoralty actually being used against us in Parliament Square, Central London, and b) I was because of draconian adoption legislation, never actually voluntarily in the UK, and c) the fact the monarchy use a not so Australian ‘Constitution’ that is only about keeping their foot in the door in Australia !!
The… possession of adopted people is the real problem:
I don’t personally have any interest in either a London Mayoralty or the inequality of monarchy who are both essentially superfluous, because I personally champion, like most people would, having an International Civil Court with the choice of juries that could be based in Jerusalem.
I obviously (a civil jury would agree) qualify for a diplomatic passport because I have better things to do with my time than have it wasted by politicians who used draconian adoption legislation to endlessly keep trying to change my nationalities and citizenships to suit their… politics !!
It’s not okay being bullied by politicians taking advantage of my having to use a walking stick to try and get around while I am illegally being stopped from living in my own home in Breizh, France when they obviously know I would benefit from having the stability of living in my own home. It is unforgivable politicians have been lying behind my back, claiming I “own property in Australia” with the fact they lied about that further confirming they know they are acting illegally.
Of course, what is not disputed is that I did not voluntarily return to Australia in July 2019, and no adopted person should ever need to have anything to do with any adversarial courts over draconian adoption legislation, because there is nothing ‘wrong’ about rejecting draconian adoption legislation.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 