Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: State Premier Andrews is intentionally harming & punishing me without law, by illegally stopping me as an Australian citizen, from having an Australian passport in my own identity, so I can live in my own home in Breizh, France with compensation after he already didn’t care about actual premeditated political torture & attempted murder of me in the UK etc etc, all because I am an equal & adult when as an adoption refusenik, I say no to draconian adoption legislation (06.06.2022)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression, and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
It is absolutely unlawful to label someone else ‘adopted’ to subject that person to draconian adoption legislation.
It is clearly unlawful for the State Premier Andrews to illegally stop me from as an Australian citizen, having an Australian passport in my own identity, so I can live in my own home in Breizh, France with compensation after he has also covered up the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me in the UK, all because I am an equal and adult who says no to draconian adoption legislation.
It is self evident that Australian politicians like Premier Andrews who did not care about the actual premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me in the UK, because I am labelled ‘adopted’, do not now care about my health in Australia, where they do not want to admit to a civil jury they also lied from July 2019 onwards when I was forced to return to Australia, including when they claimed from 20th November 2020, that I “own property in Australia”. That lie directly led to my being unlawfully arrested on 21st December 2021 because politicians had known since Mothers Day 2006 in the UK, when I was in Parliament Square, Central London, between 2005 and 2013 that they had no recognized defence in law to a legally binding civil jury nullification of draconian adoption legislation.
It is not legal to punish me without law because I say as someone labelled ‘adopted’ that I am an adoption refusenik, who is an adult and an equal, and can say no to draconian adoption legislation and should neither expect nor in fact, be punished for doing so. I was an Australian citizen before I was labelled adopted, and I passed a driving test, that was not reliant on my adopted identity, to get a drivers licence, and so on and so forth. The Supreme Court in Australia could not publicly say that a politician could punish me, by stopping me as an Australian citizen who is an equal and adult, from having an Australian passport in my own identity, because I say no to draconian adoption legislation, including while politicians publicly claim at the same time that draconian adoption legislation does now ‘allow’ some people labelled ‘adopted’ to use their own identity as children. It is never the case that “nothing save adoption will do”. The reality is draconian adoption legislation has never had anything to do with child protection, because it is solely about the political exploitation of vulnerable children.
I support, like most people would, an International Civil Court with the choice of juries, that could be based in Jerusalem, and help oversee legally reviewable ‘care arrangements’ it is clear vulnerable minors automatically ‘age out of’ at adulthood. I was always legally entitled, even if any ‘out of home’ care arrangements had been legal in my case which they were not, to when I became an adult, make my own decisions, free from the likes of draconian adoption legislation.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 