Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: The politicians (ie: State Premier Andrews & his Mr Robin Scott MP for Preston & fmr Ministerial Asst State ‘Treasurer’ & alleged ‘branch-stacker’) police & courts are intentionally breaching their ‘duty of care’ because they do not dispute my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 etc over Mothers Day 2006 in the UK serves as a Default Judgement, over the fact there is no recognized defence in law to the legally binding civil jury nullification of draconian adoption legislation (01.06.2022)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The politicians breached their ‘duty of care’ in many ways including by intending to use draconian adoption legislation as a means to deny access to people labelled ‘adopted’ by others, who politicians intentionally exploited as children, even the right to a civil jury that would include nullification of draconian adoption legislation. The political language of ‘adoption’ is not a legal description someone who refuses to be labelled ‘adopted’ by others is legally obliged to use.
The Australian politicians know that it was proved in the British courts that the BBC illegally leaked my adopted name on Mothers Day 2006 with false information to try and cause me serious harm, because they were involved in illegally trying to stop the legally binding civil jury nullification of draconian adoption legislation, along with ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005. It is unconscionable that politicians intended that people politicians first exploit as vulnerable minors by labelling them ‘adopted’ should never have… access to at the very least civil jury nullification of the legislation that politicians use.
It’s ‘difficult’ to know why the two Blairs did not immediately resign after publishing what was proved in the courts to be a lie:
The legal reality is politicians, police and courts are intentionally breaching their duty of care because they do know that draconian adoption legislation is of itself a breach of politicians and public officials duty of care, because draconian adoption legislation is legally unjustifiable in any and all circumstances. In my own case politicians have illegally used draconian adoption legislation to hide the identity of people who violently assault me.
The political exploitation of vulnerable children with the legislative sleight of hand of draconian adoption legislation that falsely claims politicians and courts can impose what are highly unusual, exceptional and wholly unreasonable lifelong ‘adoption’ court orders are absolutely unlawful because they are intended to… permanently transfer the personal autonomy and agency of someone labelled ‘adopted’ by others to politicians and courts.
This is a self evidently a completely… political rather than legal statement of “nothing else save adoption will do” in 2019 from a politicized member of the British Judiciary called HH Justice Simmonds (who was solely focused on what… politicians want):
The true political purpose of draconian adoption legislation is to exploit vulnerable children to try and permanently take away our rights as adults too, to make our own decisions just like people who are not labelled ‘adopted’ do. It’s really about politicians illegally seizing… control over/ and unlawfully interfering in a law abiding private citizen’s life. The fact there are any number of reasons that could mean anyone is unable to live with their own family, does not change that draconian adoption legislation is legally unjustifiable in all circumstances.
The fact politicians, police and courts did (unlawfully)… arrest me because I refuse to be labelled ‘adopted’ or accept draconian adoption legislation being imposed on me, only confirms that draconian adoption legislation is wholly political. No-one who cares about the physical and emotional health and well-being of anyone else would have them arrested !! for refusing a political label !!!! like ‘adopted’. The politicians and courts have never fully informed anyone labelled ‘adopted’ by others that they will be …. arrested if they refuse to be labelled ‘adopted’ by others. !!
The politicians and courts cannot legally use draconian adoption legislation to label someone ‘adopted’ to claim politicians and courts can then…. interfere in our adult lives too:
The legal reality is the opposite of what a politicized judiciary like HH Justice Simmonds claimed in Plymouth in the UK in 2019 when he made the political, rather than legal statement that “nothing else save (lifelong ) adoption (order) will do” because politicians and courts know they only have the legal authority to make legally reviewable ‘care arrangements’ vulnerable children automatically ‘age out of’ at adulthood. It is unconscionable for politicians and courts to use an… adversarial legal system to label someone else ‘adopted’ for what is only political, rather than legal reasons. An obvious particular problem with the political… sentence !! that an HH Justice Simmonds was arbitrarily imposing on two vulnerable children is that apart from it was so obviously really about supplying a couple of children to suit the wish-list/demands of people who in that case labelled themselves a “same sex couple” is the legal reality, the politicians and courts lacked the legal authority to meet the demands of the adult adopters to make a court order that could continue into the adulthood of the children. (The politicians are ridiculously trying to re-brand ‘birth’ certificates these days including by trying to force people to let the… government list as many government approved groups of ‘parents’ (ie: biological and adopters etc) as the… government wants on a person’s own supposed ‘birth’ certificate. The politics doesn’t really change the reality that somewhere along the way a male and female conceive a child, by some means or another, even if they were in a relationship with others, that these days that can include all sorts of commercial surrogacy ‘arrangements’ that rely on cut and paste versions of draconian adoption legislation, regardless of whatever politically convenient label people may then want to give themselves on a ‘birth’ certificate etc etc)
The Australian politicians and courts know the reason I have a Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 in the UK over Mothers Day 2006 which is the same as a Default Judgement against draconian adoption legislation, is because I had already proved in courts that my adopted identity was illegally leaked with false information on Mothers Day 2006 because there is no recognised defence in law to legally binding civil jury nullification of draconian adoption legislation.
I went and spoke to a public housing office about over 55 public housing shortly after I was illegally stopped from living in my own home in Breizh, France and forced to return to Australia in… July 2019.
The public housing office claimed I could not put in the paperwork with them, because they did not deal with the actual paperwork themselves, but had contracted out the business of ‘arranging’ the paperwork with for example Launch Housing in Collingwood.
The Launch Housing in Collingwood eventually arranged a brief meeting, where I provided the necessary documentary evidence of my owning property in Breizh, France, so they were fully aware of that etc etc and:
a) the fact I was illegally being stopped from living in my own home in Breizh, France that is a property I do own.
b) the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me by the British government that Australian politicians have always been complicit in.
The reality is staff at Launch Housing in Collingwood only act politically rather professionally, so they are completely disrespectful and full on ‘victim blaming’ someone who refuses to be labeled ‘adopted’ (they are obviously seriously biased because they would be fine if I wanted to ‘identify’ as anything the… government was selling) I have sometimes complained to friends who are LGBT + they have more rights than I do !! because they are politically free to ‘identify’ as whatever they like, but of course politicians do routinely for political advantage or expediency misrepresent the LGBT + community too.
I reasonably believe the State Premier passed my ‘housing’ issue to the Preston MP because Labour politicians consider that to be a safe Labour… voting area, and the politicians also knew I was owed compensation from… the Treasury (because I have no connection to Preston)
At some point Launch Housing in Collingwood tried to distract from the what were clearly very serious legal issues already in front of them, by saying if I wanted public housing on a ground level, I would need to provide some additional medical information, which was at best an illegal ‘fishing expedition’.
The unavoidable overall impression more generally is, that public housing is ‘arranged’ according to how willing a member of the public is to… vote for a particular political party !! rather than the availability of any particular public housing in an area someone is living in.
The politicians in my own case are only bothered about politics, not the person.
It is known I made a formal complaint when I was illegally detained in hotel quarantine in August 2020 that I was actually illegally being stopped from living in my own home in Breizh, France while being illegally denied public housing in Victoria.
It is self evident the true reason I have illegally been denied pubic housing in Victoria while being illegally stopped from living in my own home in Breizh, France, is because the same State government cannot explain why they are using the unlawful state interference of draconian adoption legislation to illegally stop my having an Australian passport in my own identity and living in my own home in Breizh, France with compensation.
I was unaware until 20th May 2022 that the State Premier of Victoria had passed along my housing paperwork to his Ministerial Asst Treasurer, a Mr Robin Scott who sits in the ‘safe’ state and federal Labour seat in Preston where the facts are:
a) a Mr Robin Scott in his role as State MP for Preston and a Ministerial Asst State Treasurer is legally responsible for a fraudulent letter dated 17th January 2020 (that Launch Housing Collingwood gave me a copy of on 20th May 2022) that illegally covered up any mention of my being illegally stopped from living in my own home in Breizh France while illegally refusing to provide me with over 55 public housing
The politicians (and courts) all knew that the ‘adoption’ court order had always been illegally withheld from me while I was living overseas (to try and stop the jury nullification of legislation)
The only reason draconian adoption legislation has persisted for so long is because of the absence of an International Civil Court with the choice of juries that could be based in Jerusalem, that most people would agree to, that could oversee legally reviewable care arrangements vulnerable children automatically ‘age out of’ at adulthood. It is unconscionable that adult politicians exploit vulnerable children with draconian adoption legislation.
b) that after I made the formal complaint in August 2020 that I was being illegally detained in hotel quarantine in Melbourne, because I was being illegally stopped from living in my own home in Breizh, France, while also being illegally refused over 55 public housing in Australia a Mr Robin Scott who had by that time resigned as a Ministerial Asst Treasurer in the Victorian State government (purportedly over ‘branch-stacking’ that politicians claim is not illegal, while lying about a member of the public labeled ‘adopted’ most certainly is !!!!) FRAUDULENTLY claimed in public records he is legally responsible for their being falsified, on 20th November 2020 that were included without my knowledge or without question by Launch Housing in Collingwood the claim that I “own property in Australia” which Mr Robin Scott, the MP for Preston and the State Premier both know to be untrue.
The political lies that Labour politicians had circulated… behind my back, on 20th November 2020 then clearly led to my also being unlawfully arrested on 21st December 2021 inside and outside the County Court in Melbourne, because I obviously refuse to be labelled ‘adopted’ by what is very clearly institutionally corrupt draconian adoption legislation where the starting point is politicians lying about the identity of someone else, to suit themselves politically.
I thought the Launch Housing in Collingwood must be mistaken but they were adamant that was what their copy of their records about me that they said had been updated by Preston Public Housing on 20th November 2020 claimed I “owned property in Australia”.
I think it was… illegal for Launch Housing Collingwood to on 20th May 2022:
a) refuse to provide me with a computer printout of that information for me to give to the courts on 20th May 2022 because the information does after all claim to be about me.
b) I also think it was illegal for Launch Housing Collingwood to, once I had told them the information was false to i) refuse to amend their ‘notes’ on the computer ii) speak directly with the Preston Public Housing Office while I was there, to identify where the information came from and to confirm they had amended their records
(When I said to Launch Housing in Collingwood that I had formally complained about being illegally detained in hotel quarantine while I was illegally detained in got quarantine, they asked me who detained me in hotel quarantine and I explained it was the SAME DHHS involved in illegally refusing me public housing while I am being illegally stopped from living in my own home in Breizh, France for goodness sakes)
The Launch Housing Collingwood have themselves caused me serious ongoing harm because of course they have unnecessarily prolonged my being homeless and stopped me from living in my… own home in Breizh, France too.
The State Premier Andrews and the State MP for Preston Scott obviously could not stand in the County or Supreme Court in Melbourne and claim I “own property in Australia”.
(The latest Australian Federal Labour government is essentially the same job lot of career politicians who worked with Rudd & Gillard)
It is seriously illegal for draconian adoption legislation to be used to stop me living in my own home as an adult !!
Even the politicians lying behind my back with the false claim that I “own property in Australia’ still would not explain why I do not have an… Australian passport in my own identity.
It is clearly wholly disproportionate for State politicians to use draconian adoption legislation to stop me having an Australian passport in my own identity. It should not be any of their business.
It is undeniably self evident, the Victorian State Premier and his MP for Preston clearly lied behind my back that I ‘own property in Australia’ to distract from the fact I am legally entitled to have an Australian passport in my own identity, which I should never have been forced to return to Australia to argue with !! state politicians over.
The politicians just use ‘victim blaming’ against someone they labelled ‘adopted’ who refuses to be labelled ‘adopted’ by their draconian adoption legislation.
(The Victorian Labour party obviously know the former Australian Labour PM Rudd ripped me off in HQ11X00563 that he was given $1.4 billion dollars by the British Tories including Johnson and Westminster Council to cover up. A Aiken orchestrated the ‘reputation management’ for Rudd & Johnson et al. The latest Federal Australian government essentially only consists of the same old career politicians in Labour who worked with Rudd & Gillard at that time)
I have been collecting the receipts for my accommodation the State of Victoria are legally obliged to pay me for, that I will need to be paid now so I can continue paying for my accommodation.
There is a serious issue because politicians are illegally in the here and now making me homeless by illegally using draconian adoption legislation to refuse to provide me with an Australian passport in my own identity, so I can also live in my own home in Breizh, France, and have medical records in my own identity and so on and so forth.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 