Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: I am legally entitled to urgent court hearing incl. out of hours to clarify only reason politicians are intentionally continuing to cause me serious harm by illegally denying me Australian passport in my own identity, so I can live in my own home in Breizh, France with compensation etc etc is because they had no recognized defence in law to legally binding civil jury nullification of draconian adoption legislation on Mothers Day 2006 in UK, that is a continuing legal reality a judge in Australia cannot change because politicians cannot change the legal reality of the peace and harmony of the rule of law (27.05.2022)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The Australian politicians craven and cowardly cheering of the… violent thuggery of Johnson in the UK is not going to change they had and have no recognised defence in law to the legally binding civil jury nullification of draconian adoption legislation.
The whole time the ‘system’ of Westminster ‘politics’ literally used me as a punching bag because I am labelled ‘adopted’ did not change it is not actually legally possible to change… the peace and harmony of the rule of law to make the… political interference of draconian adoption legislation lawful.
I am a very ordinary person, and my using my own identity and having an Australian passport in my own identity, should not be down to the political ideology of someone else. It is completely… disproportionate for politicians to illegally refuse to provide me with an Australian passport in my own identity, for purely political reasons that have no foundation in the peace and harmony of the rule of law. It’s not legally possible to pass the buck or spin divide and rule between state and federal agencies, because it is the State of Victoria who are stopping me from getting an Australian passport in my own identity which is the situation wherever I am living. The State of Victoria have no legal grounds to use draconian adoption legislation to stand in the way of my having an Australian passport in my own identity. The… political bullying is clear because this is not something someone who is not labelled ‘adopted’ has to go through to have something so basic as an Australian passport.
The former Australian Labour PM Rudd had no legal authority to hide official reports written by Australian public officials in the UK about the violent thuggery of politics towards me, because it would interfere with his ability to continue illegally using his political position to profit from securing ongoing contracts from for example the British Tories & Labour he laundered through Ingeus of which he was nevertheless a beneficiary. The sole reason Rudd stood as Australian PM was to protect his poverty profiteering in the UK and elsewhere that was threatened by any change in politics in Westminster. The only reason he got the $1.4 billion dollar contract from the British Tories for Ingeus, was because he illegally covered up the violent thuggery used on me, that he was entirely complicit in. He has always got contracts from the Australian Liberal party too, so his only political ‘ideology’ has always been poverty profiteering.
The politicians like Victoria, Australia’s own Tim Smith ‘M.P’ and the Spectator (which is an apt title) trying to justify the violent thuggery of Johnson is deeply offensive.
The draconian adoption legislation is a legally unjustifiable… political interference and… political ideology that has no legitimate aim convincingly established in civil or criminal… law.
I was literally used as a punching bag by the violent thuggery of the ‘system’ of Westminster ‘politics’ for no other reason than the fact I am labelled ‘adopted’ proved on Mothers Day 2006 that politicians had no recognised defence in law to the legally binding civil jury nullification of draconian adoption legislation.
I could have been… anyone who was labelled ‘adopted’ but it was me and it happened to be me, and they said they would “make an example of me” (‘pour les autres’) in the knowledge… I cannot lie about or change the legal reality of the peace and harmony of the rule of law that most people like myself have no problem living within every single day.
I didn’t have any… choice to just walk away from the political label of ‘adopted’ forced on me. The politicians are really two faced about their political ideology of draconian adoption legislation, variously claiming people who are labelled ‘adopted’ who do not want to be, still need politicians permission to use our own identity, but people who agree to be labelled adopted might be and are sometimes ’allowed’ by politicians to use their own identity. The draconian adoption legislation is a political racket.
I don’t want there to be another human like me who is labelled ‘adopted’ who the violent thuggery of the ‘system’ of Westminster ‘politics’ which is based on forcibly imposing… inequality (ie: the monarchy and vast House of Lords) use as a punching bag to keep their… political ideology of draconian adoption legislation.
It was never okay for people to be promoted and to profit from using me as a punching bag in Westminster.
The only reason Johnson became Mayor of London and the British PM was because Westminster was scraping the barrel with his violent thuggery. The sum total of what Johnson will ever represent is violent thuggery. The only way Johnson became Mayor of London was by covering up violent thuggery in Westminster and the only way he became the British PM was by covering up violent thuggery in Westminster. It was really cowardly to use me as punching bag who was an easy target because of my being labelled ‘adopted’.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 