Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Re: My Mandatory Supreme Court Orders against 1. Victorian Premier (incl. $1.4 billion dollars compensation) 2. Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police (incl. $1 million dollars compensation) & 3. Adoption Information Service at Department of Justice (incl. $1 million dollars compensation) because I refuse to be labelled ‘adopted’ by others including politicians & public officials who have their own agendas that ignores the real world that includes I now… urgently need specialist health-care & hospital treatment, while living in my own home in Breizh, France (25.05.2022)
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: My Mandatory Supreme Court Order against Victorian Premier means he pays any court costs of the order & stops maliciously labeling me ‘adopted’ against my will, while he does not deny he was not too busy to find time to maliciously target & illegally detain me in hotel quarantine in August 2020, before illegally circulating fraudulent information behind my back from 20th November 2020 onwards that I “own property in Australia” that then resulted in the ‘stand over’ tactics of having me unlawfully arrested inside & outside County Court in Melbourne on 21st December 2021 because the Premier knows I don’t own property in Australia & invalid adoption ‘court order’ was illegally withheld from me while I lived overseas so it could not be challenged, so I am only being illegally… punished without law, by him stopping me living in my own home in Breizh, France with my own identity and an Australian passport in my own identity along with medical records and healthcare in my own identity solely because I refuse to be labelled ‘adopted’ by others, including by politicians who have their own agendas (25.05.2022)
It insults anyone’s intelligence, that politicians like for example the British PM Johnson or the Victorian Premier Andrews can label someone else adopted even if that person refuses to be labelled ‘adopted’ by others, including politicians who have their own agendas.
The Premier has by… illegally labeling me ‘adopted’ against my will, failed to understand and acknowledge that I am at the very least his equal and most certainly not his servant. He clearly knew what he was doing was illegal or he would not have been spreading false information behind my back while having me unlawfully arrested because he could not repeat his lies in court before a civil jury. His behaviour is a serious abuse of public trust and power.
The politicians have always been legally obliged to have insurance cover for draconian adoption legislation, although I would be curious to see it.
It really is quite incredible that politicians are so terribly precious about the labels people use to describe them ! yet think nothing about insulting the intelligence of law abiding civilians by pretending being labeled ‘adopted’ by others means we must surrender our personal agency !! I think not.
The Victorian politicians only used their latest ‘phoney inquiry’ to buy time before an election, so they could say just before an election they thought they might churn out some more fake ‘birth certificates’ sometime in the future to try and sweep the harm already and still being caused by adoption under the carpet while they negligently continue with a failed and fraudulent system that has never been fixed. The completely corrupt use of draconian adoption legislation has not changed in any true legal sense.
The Premier has no legal alternative but to accept I refuse to be labelled ‘adopted’ by others, including politicians like himself and provide me with $1.4 billion tax free dollars compensation etc he is perfectly capable of being able to pay this week, and could even get an advance from the former Australian Labour PM Rudd who ripped me off using Ingeus of which Rudd is a financial beneficiary, when he was paid by the British politicians to… hide I won HQ11X00563 etc.
I live in the real world, where I have to pay for… urgent healthcare and hospital treatment ( I don’t tend to go anywhere near healthcare unless I really need to) because of the prolonged harm caused by being labelled ‘adopted’ by… politicians, who have their own agendas.
I understandably find it deeply offensive that when I am seriously unwell, politicians keep trying to label me ‘adopted’ against my will !! when not having my own identity has already caused me sooooooooo much harm.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
N.B: The legal reality is there could only ever be a presumption that anyone labelled ‘adopted’ by others has not agreed, unless there is some conclusive proof from the person labelled ‘adopted’ saying otherwise, that would need to include confirmation of having been fully informed of all the government records and the deprivation of personal rights and autonomy through the use of draconian adoption legislation.
_________
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: My Mandatory Supreme Court Order against Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police means he pays any court costs of this order and police are prevented from arresting me inside or outside any court because I refuse to be labelled ‘adopted’ and police provide a written apology to me for my unlawful arrests on 21st December 2021 because Victorian State Premier has from 20th November 2020 onwards (because they knew the adoption ‘court order’ was illegally withheld from me when I lived overseas so it could not be challenged etc etc) been maliciously circulating fraudulent information behind my back, that I “own property in Australia” which politicians and public officials knew they could not repeat in court, that also means Victoria Police owe me substantial financial compensation of $1 million dollars they are perfectly capable of being able to pay this week (25.05.2022)
The Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police did not reasonably believe it was proportionate to arrest me because I refuse to be labelled adopted AND because the Premier of Victoria had been lying behind my back since 20th November 2020, so he didn’t want me going to court on 21st December 2021 or indeed any other time.
I do not personally believe Victoria Police have any insurance cover to arrest someone for refusing to be labelled ‘adopted’ by others or to be made subject to draconian adoption legislation.
It could never under any circumstances be… proportionate to arrest me because I refuse to be labelled ‘adopted’ by others, including politicians, police and courts.
It is obviously unlawful to arrest me because the Premier did not want to be found out lying about me behind my back, which is a pretty low thing for him to be doing anyway, that is also such a serious abuse of power.
I reasonably consider my personal health to be more important than whatever the political agenda of politicians might happen to be on any given day, that I do already know will never care about vulnerable children in out of home care.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
________
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: My Mandatory Supreme Court Order against the Adoption Information Service in the Department of Justice means they pay any court costs of this order and compensation of $1 million dollars along with supplying by email to me a complete copy of any records they claim to have regarding my being labelled ‘adopted’ because politicians & courts with their knowledge illegally withheld for example an adoption ‘court order’ from me while I lived overseas so it could not be challenged, which the AIS are dishonestly & illegally trying to… distract from by dishonestly claiming they have the right to provide or withhold my information about my adoption, and not send a complete record by email so it is clear what has been disclosed, because they are more generally & illegally sweeping under the carpet the known problems with draconian adoption legislation to keep recklessly churning out what they call ‘adoptions’ (25.05.2022)
The politicians, courts and so called Adoption Information Service in the Department of Justice have NEVER been open and … honest with people labelled ‘adopted’ by others about the information that exists and the legal obligations of basic disclosure, while worst of all trying to stop someone labelled ‘adopted’ having personal agency by illegally withholding adoption ‘court orders’ to for example stop them being challenged overseas.
The quality of information coming out of the Adoption Information Service is basically manipulative and dishonest victim blaming, intentionally trying to dump all the very serious legal problems that can be caused by draconian adoption legislation on to the person labelled ‘adopted’ by others, while at the same time trying to keep churning a corrupt system of adoption over by sweeping any harm caused to people labelled adopted under the carpet.
The grossly negligent people at AIS are still recklessly churning out ‘adoptions’ in the full knowledge of and regardless of the harm they know has already been caused to people labelled ‘adopted’ by others, that they know has not been remedied. The AIS are continuing with an already failed system of adoption by illegally trying to sweep any harm caused to people labelled ‘adopted’ by others, under the carpet.
It’s obvious that AIS are not acting professionally in an unbiased or independent way.
Their minds are completely closed to the possibility, let alone legal reality of someone refusing to be labelled ‘adopted’ by others or being made subject to draconian adoption legislation. It’s outside their narrow frame of reference of political language, that what they try and call adoption, is called child/human trafficking which is a closer legal definition for some people adversely affected.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 