Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Re: My Mandatory Supreme Court Order against Preston ‘Social Housing’/DHHS & Launch Housing Collingwood means they are legally obliged to provide written… proof by email to myself & Supreme Court they have amended what they do not deny are their fraudulent records about me (ie: 20th November 2020) to confirm that I do not own property in Australia along with providing me with agreed compensation & paying any court costs, related to this order, because the only reason I was illegally denied ‘social housing’ in Australia, is because politicians have been hiding their intended purpose in illegally stopping me living in my own home in Breizh, France, with my own identity, is to… punish me etc, because I refuse to be labelled ‘adopted’ (24.05.2022)
The Preston Social Housing/DHHS and Launch Housing Collingwood do not deny they are illegally keeping fraudulent records about me.
Therefore my Mandatory Supreme Court Order against Preston ‘Social Housing’/DHHS & Launch Housing Collingwood means they are legally obliged to provide written… proof by email to myself & Supreme Court they have amended what they do not deny are their fraudulent records about me (ie: 20th November 2020) to confirm that I do not own property in Australia along with providing me with agreed compensation, and paying for any court costs related to this order, because the only reason I was illegally denied ‘social housing’ in Australia, is because politicians have been hiding their intended purpose in illegally stopping me living in my own home in Breizh, France, is to… punish me, because I refuse to be labelled ‘adopted’.
The intended purpose of illegally stopping me living in my own home in Breizh, France is to… punish me for refusing to be labelled ‘adopted’.
The whole purpose of illegally stopping me using my own identity, whether it is living in my own home in Breizh, France, with my own identity, or having an Australian passport in my own identity, or having my medical records in my own identity, or a drivers licence in my own identity, is only to… punish me because I refuse to be labelled ‘adopted’ by others.
It is self evident that it is illegal to enact legislation like draconian adoption legislation that claims someone labelled adopted by others cannot be released from draconian adoption legislation unless first agreeing to not sue for any…. harm caused by the legislation.
The only possible legal outcome for someone labelled ‘adopted’ is that someone labelled adopted only has to… notify politicians or a court, verbally or by email, or through nominated legal support, without needing to appear in person in court, of the refusal to be labelled ‘adopted’ that cannot be denied by politicians, police or courts.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 