Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: The profound… victim blaming culture of draconian adoption legislation only… punishes me by perversely claiming I must first agree to being labelled ‘adopted’ by others to stand a chance of no longer being labelled ‘adopted’ by others because it is only others draconian adoption legislation that can decide if someone labelled ‘adopted’ by others should no longer be labelled ‘adopted’ by others (23.05.2022)
It wasn’t at all ‘civil’ to have me unlawfully arrested inside and outside the County Court in Melbourne, on 21st December 2021, because I refuse to be labelled adopted. There is no peace and harmony of the rule of law involved in people who are labelled ‘adopted’ by others, being sold as ‘products’ .
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I am not personally a follower of whatever happens to be the latest fashionable politics of the day.
It is perverse but true:
The profound… victim blaming culture of draconian adoption legislation… punishes me by perversely claiming I must first agree to being labelled ‘adopted’ by others to stand a chance of no longer being labelled ‘adopted’ by others because it is only ‘others’ draconian adoption legislation that can decide if someone labelled ‘adopted’ by others should no longer be labelled ‘adopted’ by others.
It is self evident, politicians are not going to find a credible health professional who is willing to tell a civil jury, that I should be punished because I refuse to be labelled ‘adopted’ by others, by being made homeless and forced to live rough on the streets with the fake ‘adopted’ identity etc etc etc etc.
The label of being ‘adopted’ comes with the most extraordinary, highly unusual, completely unreasonable and onerous imposition of a lifelong ‘court order’.
The profound… victim blaming culture of draconian adoption legislation punishes me for being labelled ‘adopted’ by others by claiming no family member could give me as some-one labelled ‘adopted’ any medical history, and b) that it is my fault !!!! when I am physically and emotionally harmed by draconian adoption legislation, because I refuse to be labelled ‘adopted’ and ‘comply’ with others draconian adoption legislation.
The true facts are there are no legal or medical grounds to label anyone ‘adopted’ but there are overwhelming legal and medical grounds to not use the label ‘adopted’ on either a vulnerable child, or against the will of someone as an adult too.
I am legally entitled to have my medical records in my own identity, rather than my fake ‘adopted’ identity, so that there actually is an accurate and contemporaneous record of the true facts adversely affecting my health.
The politicians ‘public housing’ fraud & corruption:
The corrupt staff at another phoney ‘NGO’ called Launch Housing in Collingwood refused on 20th May 2022 to a) take a signed witness statement or b) statutory declaration from me, or c) amend their falsified records, or d) provide a computer printout of their actual records including the so called ‘notes’ for me to take to a court, while in the true victim blaming culture of draconian adoption, trying to say it was somehow my fault !! that politicians were… without my knowledge from 20th November 2020 (according to Launch) circulating false information behind my back, that I owned property in Australia, because & after I made a formal complaint while being illegally detained in ‘hotel quarantine’ in August 2020 that politicians were illegally stopping me living in my own home in Breizh, France.
The brazen… willingness of staff at Launch Housing in Collingwood to be corrupt in May 2022 (at some level I knew they were being corrupt in 2019 because they were unwilling to properly record the pre-meditated political torture and attempted murder of me in the UK) has obviously adversely affected my health, because I have to deal with the real world consequences of their corruption.
It is very serious that politicians have been lying behind my back !! saying I “own property in Australia” (in my fake ‘adopted’ identity) to try and hide they are illegally forcing me to not only be homeless, but to live rough in Australia, because the actual property I do own is in Breizh, France. Their lies about property, still don’t explain why I don’t ‘own’ an Australian… passport in my own identity.
The politicians have at best illegally sought to… distract from compensation over their illegally using draconian adoption legislation, to stop me having a passport in my own identity and living in my own home in Breizh, France, in my own identity, that in not only making me homeless in Australia, also forces me to sleep rough too, which is intended to further adversely affect my health, while politicians falsely claim I “own property in Australia” !!
The politicians ’sidestep’ the legal reality, I am legally entitled to be able to use my own identity, to live in what is already my own home in Breizh, France, that I own, just like people who are not labelled ‘adopted’ can buy and live in property in other countries using their own identity.
My case, does highlight there is obviously a pattern of false information circulated by ‘others’ like when the British government/Parliament did of course illegally use my ‘adopted’ identity, to illegally publish and circulate false information on the BBC about me on Mothers Day 2006 using ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 that had many similarities with draconian adoption legislation and was forced off the statute books.
The politicians are trying to avoid paying the costs of my hotel accommodation and healthcare too !! because my health is obviously seriously adversely affected by not having the stability of my own home and access to any proper medical treatment while made homeless and forced to sleep rough too. It is self evident politicians are legally obliged to pay for healthcare and hotel accommodation, if they want to argue about draconian adoption legislation while they have forced me to live in Australia, because the politicians could have argued about draconian adoption legislation, while I was in my own home in Breizh, France. A civil jury would ask why it could not be legally resolved while I at least had the stability of living in my own home in Breizh, France, when even whatever medical records there are from then, make it clear I was seriously ill.
It is self evident, draconian adoption legislation could not and does not make vulnerable children feel or be safe. A person who is ‘labelled’ adopted by others has never really had any choice.
There are no reliable records generated by draconian adoption legislation, so the only way to remedy the circulation of false information by government agencies using the corruption that is draconian adoption legislation is by guaranteeing that all government generated information about someone who refuses to be labelled ‘adopted’ by others, must first be verified by the person who refuses to be labelled ‘adopted’ by others.
My High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ …Court Order from 16th April 2008 & CCTV of premeditated political torture & attempted murder of me over Mothers Day 2006 did nullify draconian adoption legislation, so I am legally entitled to live in my own home in Breizh France, with free Australian passport in my own identity & $1.4 billion dollars compensation, to support an International Civil Court with choice of juries that could be based in Jerusalem.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 