Donna Bugat -v-State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Re: St Vincent’s Hospital Specialist Clinic 23rd May 2022 UR1213XX6 (I will need prior written confirmation from hospital sent to me, the County Court, Department of Justice & Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police, agreeing I am free to use my own identity & for all my medical records to be changed to my own identity, to help me make my own informed choices regarding my own medical treatment without any interference from political & draconian lifelong adoption ‘court order’ made on 28th May 1963 using adoption legislation) (20.05.2022)
I understandably do not personally reasonably believe I need to justify or have the permission of anyone else to use my own identity just because politicians and public officials labelled me ‘adopted’ with a draconian… lifelong ‘court order’ and adoption legislation that is seriously discriminatory and wholly disproportionate.
It must be my own choice and I must have the personal agency to use my own identity without my needing to justify that or have the permission of anyone else, to help me actually make my own informed choices about my health and medical treatment just like anyone else who is not labelled ‘adopted’. There could never have been any legal or medical justification for politicians arbitrarily legislating to permanently stop someone labelled ‘adopted’ from ever even being given any medical information from our own family members, including our siblings and our parents.
I have found it is a lot less stressful and much more straightforward and easier for me in every way, when I can use my own identity. Everything to do with being forcibly labelled ‘adopted’ and being made to use a false identity against my will, is at the very least stressful and far too confusing, unhelpful, and distressing, specifically with regard to my being able to make properly informed decisions about my own medical treatment. It was a doctor in New Zealand many years ago who originally recognised what turned out to be a serious health issue, and asked some relevant questions I would not have considered because so much stress is attached to being forced to be labelled ‘adopted’ to suit the… political policies of others, rather than what is in the best interests of my own health.
There are currently five different health specialists and accompanying referrals etc etc in Melbourne, Australia, but two of the main problems are:
a) I am not and have never been free to even properly discuss and address my health and make my own informed choices, because of the political interference of being labelled ‘adopted’ and the lifelong adoption ‘court order’ that obviously does not serve any legitimate aim
b) I can’t afford two of the five specialists because I am in Australia, so that also compromises my health and any overall health plan.
I do currently have significant problems with for example the pain in my back etc etc and so my health would obviously have benefitted from a health plan involving all the specialists but excluding any interference from the draconian lifelong adoption ‘court order’. The fact I have been subjected to so much serious state violence over the years does not and has not helped, but it is obviously so unprofessional that any politician could even claim a… lifelong ‘court order’ could be imposed on any law abiding private citizen. Any ‘court order’ is a very serious issue, but the use of lifelong ‘court orders’ on law abiding private citizens just for being labelled ‘adopted’ is highly unusual.
I know the unreasonable state interference of the political lifelong adoption ‘court order’ made on 28th May 1963 !! for goodness sakes, is having a seriously adverse affect on my health generally because it is so arbitrary and discriminatory.
My choice to use my own identity is a choice I must be able to make without any state interference including my being threatened, intimidated, bullied, assaulted or arrested, and stopped from living in my own home etc etc.
(The politicians in the State of Victoria obviously would have openly declared themselves as defendants in courts… overseas, if they genuinely believed a life-long adoption ’court order’ labelling me ‘adopted’ in Australia, was valid and could be imposed on me against my will, and including while I am an adult !! and while I was living in my own home !! in Breizh, France)
I realize I would not be comfortable talking about my health with or having medical treatment from any health professional who agreed the draconian adoption ‘court order’ could be imposed on me against my will, and regardless of how much prolonged harm it causes me. It was really too much for me having incredibly disrespectful police (who were mostly young) in Victoria yelling at me, and generally manhandling me while being… judgemental and giving me their ten cents worth that obviously did not involve any consideration of my health at all, when they unlawfully arrested me twice on 21st December 2021 because they claim I need to…. justify refusing to be labelled ‘adopted’ to politicians, police and courts !! I pointed out I felt Victoria police would have some difficulty persuading… a civil jury, it was possible to treat people who are labelled ‘adopted’ differently from people who are not labelled ‘adopted’ because the police were clearly not going around arresting people who were using their own identity who were not labelled ‘adopted’. It was just soooooo disproportionate, and unfortunately caused a significant flare up of illnesses, because of course it was physically and emotionally stressful. I don’t have any stability in my life, because the State of Victoria are stopping me living in my own home in Breizh, France with the… stability my own identity and my own home give me.
(The Department of Justice have been unable to even send me by email a complete set of what they claim are the adoption and court records they hold about me, while they do not even have the respect to even acknowledge or recognise the adoption records about me, actually belong to me, that they cannot pick and choose what to give or withhold etc.
The County Court meanwhile has not signed an affidavit either confirming that historically, the courts never actually provided… at any time, the adoption ‘court orders’ to the person labelled ‘adopted’ which in general legal terms is highly unusual. It is after all considered standard legal practise for a court to provide the person a ‘court order’ is about, with a copy of that ‘court order’ including so there is the opportunity for it to be challenged in a timely manner.
The fact courts and the Department of Justice have not properly explained who had what information when because it is unclear what adoption records were used in court hearings and to make adoption ‘court orders’ , there is a reasonable suspicion the politicians knew such unusual ‘court orders’ were invalid.
I am, as the person labelled ‘adopted’ treated as merely a product that was sold.
The politicians tried to cover up, I was when I was born automatically an Australian citizen with my own identity… before I was later labelled ‘adopted’)
In fact, my own decision about using my own identity seems to me to be a rather good example of my asserting my personal agency which I would reasonably expect any state to respect and encourage.
So, I will need prior written confirmation from the hospital sent to me, the County Court, Department of Justice & Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police, agreeing I am free to use my own identity & for all my medical records to be changed to my own identity, to help me make my own informed choices regarding my own medical treatment without any interference from the political & draconian lifelong adoption ‘court order’ made on 28th May 1963.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 