Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police & Australian passport office in Docklands & Australian embassy in Paris know I am legally entitled to be able to immediately collect a free Australian ’replacement’ passport (I asked the government to make sure was ready yesterday) in my own identity & not ‘adopted’ identity that… politicians are only using to illegally try to delay & avoid the legal reality that means they are… automatically ‘absolutely liable’ to pay compensation including so I can have the stability of having my… own identity & living in my … own home in Breizh, France, free to make some new good memories 🙂 (17.05.2022)
FAO Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police & Legal Department & Australian passport office in Docklands & Australian Consulate in Paris.
I do obviously have the absolute legal right to have an Australian passport in my own identity, and not the adopted identity illegally imposed on me, without my needing to first pay any… court !! any money to justify myself and have their permission etc etc.
I don’t personally care whether my free ‘replacement’ Australian passport is issued by the Australian passport office in Docklands, or the Australian embassy in Paris who should have done it years ago.
The politicians are legally liable with no excuses, for the full costs of immediate replacement documents, in my own identity, like passports, property title deeds, drivers licences etc:
The politicians and courts have only illegally tried to spin their permission… distraction, which never made any actual sense, because they knew that otherwise it is clear they are… automatically ‘absolutely liable’ to pay compensation.
In fact, politicians have always illegally tried to rob me of my Australian citizenship !! and an Australian passport because I have always refuse to be labelled ‘adopted’ by someone else (ie: courts) etc.
The Australian passport issued in London in adopted identity:
My own ‘lived experience’ proves the only true reason politicians and courts have been illegally trying to claim people labelled ‘adopted’ do not have an absolute legal right to use our own identity and refuse to be labeled ‘adopted’ by someone else and made subject to the very serious state interference of a draconian lifelong adoption ‘court order’ (all court orders are very serious matters) and the accompanying legislation is to illegally try and… delay and… avoid the true legal reality that politicians are… automatically ‘absolutely liable’ to pay compensation, including so I can live in my own home in Breizh, France.
The politicians et al have the number of the Australian passport issued to me in London in 2013 (receipt attached) in the adopted identity illegally imposed on me, so it is a straightforward matter to provide a free replacement Australian passport for me in my own identity of Donna Bugat that is available for me to immediately collect.
The politicians are legally liable for the replacement costs of all documents, including property title deeds, drivers licences and so on:
Th global multi-billion dollar political… industry of what others call ‘adoption’ consists of nothing more than seriously corrupt practices, because politicians and courts always knew it is only legally possible to have legally reviewable ‘care arrangements’ vulnerable children ‘automatically age out’ of at adulthood. The best that can be said is that the succession of Australian politicians who have been involved in promoting the corrupt practise of what they call ‘adoption’ now have no excuses to avoid making proper restitution.
It was only possible to send me away from Australia as a teenager because of the existence of the draconian adoption ‘court order’ and accompanying legislation, and then it was only possible for the former Australian FM Downer to falsely try and claim I was not an Australian citizen because of the existence of the draconian adoption ‘court order’ and accompanying legislation, when I forced a related political ban on peaceful freedom of expression by law abiding private citizens in ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 off the statute books in the UK while I was in Parliament Square, Central London.
The DOJ have repeatedly failed since July 2019 for unknown reasons to send me by email (so there is no confusion about who had what information/records & when) all the documents they claim to have had/sent.
In fact, the first time I saw anything that purported to be an adoption ‘court order’ (Case 352, 28 May 1963) was when I was forced to return to Australia in July 2019 which I obviously did not voluntarily do, because my own home is in Breizh, France.
The County Court then claimed they only have a few people who are allowed to access the adoption ‘court orders’ but never arranged an appointment with anyone who was ‘allowed’ to access adoption ‘court records’ until they had me unlawfully arrested on 21st December 2021 because of course all the political lies had gone full circle. The courts had always illegally failed to provide people labelled ‘adopted’ with a copy of the adopted ‘court order’ that the person who is labelled ‘adopted’ should always have been able to get directly from a court at any time, just like in any other legal case (I unfortunately became quite familiar with that side of things when I forced ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 off the statute books in the UK) and of course I was illegally sent away from Australia as a teenager when I refused to be labelled ‘adopted’ without a copy of the ‘court order’ because the politicians and courts did know the draconian adoption ‘court orders’ are completely invalid and did not want someone labelled ‘adopted’ to be able to just travel overseas and challenge the validity of the draconian adoption ‘court order’ in foreign courts too, let alone with a civil jury who would nullify the unlawful legislation. That explains why British and Australian politicians were falling all over each other to illegally try and stop me having a civil jury in the UK, where I nevertheless have a High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 etc & HQ11X00563.
What is really in my own best interests is to live in my own home in Breizh, France with my own identity which will help provide much needed stability so I can try and improve my health, and make some new good memories.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 