Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Re: FAO Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police & Legal Department knows politicians are… illegally punishing me & refusing to provide me with a free Australian passport in my own identity, because politicians know any admission they have no legal authority to label someone else ‘adopted’ etc means they are also… automatically ‘absolutely liable’ to pay compensation, incl. for me to live in my own home in Breizh, France (because I have always refused to ‘agree’ to being labelled ‘adopted’ by someone else & have draconian adoption ‘court order’ & legislation that is unlawful in all circumstances, which is what County Court was trying to cover up with my unlawful arrests inside & outside County Court on 21st December 2021) (16.05.2022)
FAO Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police
Re: Legal & Prosecutions Specialist Branch/Prosecutions Division | Legal Services Department | Victoria Police
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
** The reason politicians are illegally refusing to provide me with a free Australian passport in my own identity, is because an admission they had no legal authority to label someone else adopted etc, means they…. automatically have ‘absolute liability’ to pay compensation because politicians and their courts know I have always refused to agree to being… labelled ‘adopted’ by someone else along with draconian adoption ‘court orders’ and legislation **
The politicians have repeatedly and recklessly persisted with draconian adoption legislation, not because they ever even believed it was legal, but because they have not wanted to pay compensation.
It is very serious that politicians and the judiciary are illegally punishing people they labelled ‘adopted’, for no other reason than to illegally try to avoid paying… compensation. The politicians and courts are literally trying to use financial and emotional… blackmail which is seriously illegal !! to try and avoid paying… compensation. It is self evident someone who was labelled ‘adopted’ would NOT need to pay money to or have the permission of a court or to justify to any court or indeed anyone else officially renouncing everything to do with draconian adoption legislation.
There is a reason most people would support an International Civil Court with the choice of civil juries, that could be based in Jerusalem, because that can genuinely help restore the equality of opportunity of the peace and harmony of the rule of law.
The… legal realities of DNA are hardly new on the adoption landscape, so the only political and judicial ‘tweaks’ are to illegally try and avoid compensation more generally:
There is a messianic presumption by too many politicians, and sycophantic members of the judiciary who have gone along with so many political and legislative abuses and unlawful state interferences including ‘Whites Only’ Australia with complete and utter disregard for their own knowledge of the… peace and harmony of the rule of law, that includes the choice of civil juries and jury nullification of unlawful legislation. It is not the case that politicians and members of the judiciary who they appoint, can simply have a cozy legislative relationship, because civil juries and jury nullification are very important checks and balances. A civil jury could not reasonably conclude it was legally possible to label someone else a) ‘adopted’ to b) impose the very serious state interference of such draconian life long ‘court orders’ (any court order, let alone one it is falsely claimed can be lifelong without even so much as the agreement of the person labelled ‘adopted’ by someone else, is a very serious matter) and c) legislation so that people who are labelled adopted by someone else cannot make the same decisions children and adults who are not labelled ‘adopted’ do.
The fact draconian adoption legislation is absolutely unlawful and can be nullified by civil jury is slightly more than ‘quirk of adoption legislation that is absolutely unlawful:
The politicians and members of the judiciary do not have any ‘recognised defence in law’ to ignoring the peace and harmony of the rule of law which highlights the permissible limits and boundaries of the state of which the judiciary is a part.
(I don’t remember a single politician or member of the judiciary in the UK being remotely pleased about my forcing the political ban on peaceful freedom of speech from law abiding private citizens in ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005, off the statute books, which was slightly more than a legislative ’tweak’. So I do not personally reasonably believe it is remotely credible that a Justice Mossop from the Supreme Court in the ACT, only relatively recently caught up with the realities of DNA !! Seriously ?? or that any member of the judiciary genuinely believes they have any legal authority to label someone else ‘adopted’ etc etc. The politicians never wanted to take legal responsibility for their legislative excess of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 either)
The politicians and judiciary have been illegally interfering in the lives of people they… label ‘adopted’ despite being labelled ‘adopted’ by someone else being legally unjustifiable in any circumstances. The politicians just wanted to get their foot in the door interfering in ‘care arrangements’ for vulnerable children with legislative excesses that have never had anything to do with ‘child protection’ and the ‘best interests’ of any child, but everything do with politicians using vulnerable children for their own political ends. That is particularly clear when you know that the word adoption was originally used by adults in Germany for the entirely different adult arrangements of ‘inheritances’ that were not related to ‘child protection’ or the ‘best interests’ of any vulnerable children.
What is a known about… adoption (that is different to another case involving the same Justice Mossop below) is that the nevertheless same Alexander Downer did know when he was Foreign Minister that he was illegally trying to deny I am an Australian… citizen, when I was in Parliament Square, Central London, because he knew I was forced to leave Australia as a teenager because I refused to agree with being labelled ‘adopted’, while politicians have only been punishing me, because they were just illegally trying to avoid compensation:
I always refused to join the intelligence services (the people who posed as my parents and godparents were from the highest echelons of the British and Australian intelligence services) because I wanted my… own identity !! so I was never going to sign any ‘official secrets act’ (there were already enough secrets about draconian adoption legislation) because unscrupulous politicians would just use that to try and hide the illegality of draconian adoption legislation too)
The reason politicians and the judiciary are punishing me and falsely claiming people who have been labelled adopted do not have the… personal freedom to entirely naturally refuse to agree to being labelled ‘adopted’ by someone else etc which of course we do, and politicians and the judiciary know is a freedom that is consistent with the peace and harmony of the rule of law is because the admission the politicians and judiciary have no legal authority to label someone else ‘adopted’ attracts strict liability for compensation.
The people who posed as my parents from the intelligence services (the unsolicited email below was legally sent to me) had told me the last time we ever spoke, the British government would never ‘allow’ me to campaign in Parliament Square, Central London (my being labelled ‘adopted’ was a ‘complication) and that I was being ‘monitored’ although it was admitted I wasn’t doing anything illegal:
It is so unconscionable to have been made to suffer so much, simply because a… succession of politicians don’t want to… admit they have acted illegally and so there is absolute liability to pay compensation.
I am legally entitled in the here & now, to an Australian passport in my own identity which I asked to have ready for me to collect today (16th May 2022) and the compensation so I can live in my own home in Breizh, France and get on with my own life.
(The best that can be said is the Australian politicians have no excuses to not now start setting a good example by making proper restitution)
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 