Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Re: FAO Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police knows I am not legally responsible for State of Victoria forcing me to leave Australia as a teenager without even providing me with any incl. official record of onerous lifelong adoption ‘court order’ so I could challenge validity in foreign courts, means it is nullified along with draconian adoption legislation, so I am legally entitled to … immediately collect a free Australian passport in my own identity & $1.4 billion dollars compensation on Monday 16th May 2022, so I can live in my own… home in Breizh, France, supporting an International Civil Court with choice of civil juries that could be based in Jerusalem (14.05.2022)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The legal reality is I could never have had any legal or contractual obligations from a seriously onerous… lifelong adoption ‘court order’ imposed on me by draconian adoption legislation, because… someone else labelled me ‘adopted’.
The only identifiable intended purpose of onerous… lifelong adoption ‘court orders’ is the punishment without law of someone who has committed no civil or criminal wrong by being labelled ‘adopted’ by… someone else.
A person who is labelled ‘adopted’ as a vulnerable child, does not have any shared ‘lived experience’ with any family members who are not labelled ‘adopted’ or people who pose as parents who are not labelled ‘adopted’ or people who for unknown reasons inexplicably choose as adults to label themselves ‘adopted’.
The Chief Commissioner of Police in Victoria knows… I am not legally responsible for the fact the State of Victoria forced me to leave Australia as a teenager, without even so much as providing me with an official copy of their lifelong adoption ‘court order’ so I could challenge it in a foreign court.
I hadn’t done anything wrong.
I had no-one to help me.
There are no words.
I was always very serious in Parliament Square, Central London about forcing the ban on peaceful freedom of expression from law abiding private citizens in ss 132-138 of the Serious Organised Crime & Police Act 2005 off the statute books in the UK, because I was… already subject to and knew about the prolonged ongoing harm caused by an onerous lifelong adoption ‘court order’ that was seriously… compounded by ss 132-138 of the Serious Organised Crime & Police Act 2005. I conclusively proved at Southwark Crown Court (with a criminal jury) in May 2013 what would be self evident to most people, that it was illegal for British politicians (with the connivance of Australian politicians) to enact ss 143 of the Police Reform & Social Responsibility Act 2011 to try and claim my human body !! could of itself be ‘construed’ as a criminal ‘structure’ in Parliament Square, Central London.
The French government and EU knew my real name is Donna Bugat when I lived in my own… home in Breizh, France, because I said so.
I obviously did not voluntarily return to Australia in July 2019.
The Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police knows when I was forced to leave Australia as a teenager (because I was not grateful about being labelled ‘adopted’) without even being provided with a copy of my onerous adoption ‘court order’ (Case 352, 28 May 1963) so I could challenge it’s validity. along with draconian adoption legislation, in foreign courts, the supposed ‘court order’ was essentially nullified along with draconian adoption legislation.
The courts have always been legally obliged to provide every single person who is officially labelled ‘adopted’ with our own official court record of the onerous lifelong adoption ‘court orders’ and indeed the courts would have, if they had ever thought what they were rubber-stamping was in any way, legal. It is… usual for courts to provide the person who is the subject of any ‘court order’ with an official copy of that ‘court order’ and the relevant legislation used.
There were no legal grounds to force me to leave Australia as a teenager without even so much giving me as a copy that was an official record of the onerous lifelong adoption ‘court order’ imposed on me by draconian adoption legislation.
The politicians and courts did not care about not only names but nationalities and citizenships of someone labelled ‘adopted’ being switched and did not in fact make any legal arrangements with other countries in respect of nationalities and citizenships switched by what is called adoption. The global multi billion dollar adoption… industry is a wholly… political free for all based on the adult demand for and supply of vulnerable children, that has never had and will never have any logical connection to child protection or the best interests of a vulnerable child labelled ‘adopted’ for life. This is undeniable because the legal reality is it is only legally possible to have legally reviewable ‘care arrangements’ vulnerable children automatically ‘age out of’ at adulthood.
No reasonable and rational responsible adult could seriously believe it is… legal to arbitrarily impose an onerous… lifelong ‘court order’ (any ‘court order’ is a very serious legal matter) on someone simply because someone else labels a person ‘adopted’ which means what ? because the word or label ’adopted’ does not provide legal grounds to impose an onerous lifelong ‘court order’.
Even, the wholly politicised language of ‘adopted’ has been imposed on me by someone else, because my own explanation of my ‘lived experience’ is of being abducted as a child, and repeatedly trafficked.This includes the fact that when I was a child who was ten years old, I asked adults to let me go home to my own family, (I had been discussing this for some time with friends) but there was no court hearing or legal grounds provided for my not being able to go home to my own family. In any event even if there had been legal grounds to stop me living with my own family as a child, it would still not have been possible to stop me independently living my own life without any ‘court order’ when I was an adult. My own parents had automatically ‘aged out of’ legislation used against them, that didn’t involve any ‘court orders’ that resulted in the undue haste of my being labelled ‘adopted’ that it was only falsely claimed were ‘care arrangements’ I could not automatically ‘age out of’ at adulthood, because the… lifelong adoption ‘court orders’ are in fact, clearly unlawful, in any and all circumstances. It’s simply not legally possible for a court to arbitrarily impose something so serious as a… lifelong ‘court order’ that is not even legally reviewable, on someone who has not committed any civil or criminal wrong.
I was legally entitled to… automatically be free of any legal oversight involving a court and a ’court order’ when I became an adult.
It is seriously illegal for politicians, police and courts to claim they can use a lifelong adoption ‘court order’ to unlawfully arrest me !! AND to… intentionally make me homeless.
The State of Victoria falsely claim I am legally and contractually bound by an onerous lifelong adoption ‘court order’ and draconian adoption legislation that stops me living in my own home in Breizh, France, with my own identity and moving on with my own life, while at the same time saying I don’t ‘qualify’ for state housing in Australia because I have my own home in Breizh, France !! The entirely political weasel words are… intentionally making someone labelled ‘adopted’ homeless, using a lifelong adoption ‘court order’ and draconian adoption legislation.
The legal reality is it is the State of Victoria who had the legal responsibility, to defend what they claim is a valid adoption ‘court order’ and draconian adoption legislation, by naming themselves as defendants in legal proceedings in foreign courts, while I was still living in my own… home in Breizh, France. The politicians in Australia have no legal authority to having failed to do that while I was living in my own… home in Breizh, France, try it on, by having me unlawfully arrested inside and outside a County Court in Melbourne, while refusing to issue me a free Australian passport in my own identity in Australia, that in so doing also illegally restricts my freedom of movement while they hide behind an invalid lifelong adoption ‘court order’ along with draconian adoption legislation. It is self evident the arrest of me inside and outside the County Court in Melbourne on 21st December 2021 (when I was not even voluntarily in the country and was only at that court, because that is where… politicians who are misleading people labeled ‘adopted’ tell people labelled ‘adopted’ to go, despite knowing that any supposed adoption/habeas corpus ‘proceedings’ that are solely ‘Australian’ are supposed to be… free in the Supreme Court) were unlawful and at best constitute ENTRAPMENT !! which the Chief Commissioner of Victorian Police who is legally responsible for my unlawful arrests must have reasonably known. The… casual use of something so serious as… arrests highlights the complete and utter disrespect the courts have for someone labelled ‘adopted’ along with the fact the courts do use the label ‘adopted’ specifically to stop someone labelled ‘adopted’ having our own voice, because the only reason I was at the court was because I want to go… home and get on with my own life with my own identity free from the state interference, intimidation and harassment etc of what the state calls ‘adoption’.
The County Court in Melbourne who originally did the dirty deed of the lifelong adoption ‘court order’ did reasonably know the court had always been acting illegally in not providing everyone labelled ‘adopted’ with an official record of the onerous lifelong ‘court order’. It explains why the County Court kept making excuses that there are only a few people in the court who are ‘allowed’ to… access the official adoption court records about the actual ‘court orders’ while never making an appointment for a time the alleged person/s would be at the court, because the County Court were really trying to hide the court had always failed in their legal duty to provide the official copy of the adoption ‘court order’ to the person labelled ‘adopted’.
So I am legally entitled to be… immediately provided with a free Australian passport in my own identity to live in my own home in Breizh, France with $1.4 billion tax free dollars compensation (the opportunistic former Australian Labour PM & FM Rudd did after all only get contracts for Ingeus, in France too, by ripping me off in HQ11X00563 etc) while I also support an International Civil Court with the choice of civil juries that could be based in Jerusalem.
Most people would support an International Civil Court with the choice of civil juries, that could be based in Jerusalem.
I am legally entitled to be able to collect the free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat on Monday 16th May 2022, along with the compensation of $1.4 billion tax free dollars.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 