Donna Bugat

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Chief Commissioner of Victorian Police legally obliged to immediately acknowledge by email I have as someone labelled ‘adopted’ legally officially renounced draconian adoption legislation (I could not legally be arrested, prosecuted, convicted or sentenced for doing by any court incl. with a civil jury I have never waived my right to) so I can peacefully live in my own… home !! in Breizh, France, with a free Australian passport in my own identity, along with $1.4 billion dollars tax free compensation etc (05.05.2022)

Re: Legal & Prosecutions Specialist Branch

Prosecutions Division | Legal Services Department | Victoria Police

1.
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.

2.
It is a matter of public record I forced British politicians political ban on law abiding private citizens peaceful freedom of expression in the maliciously libellous etc ss 132-138 of the ‘Serious Organized Crime & Police Act’ 2005 off the statute books in the UK, despite opposition from all the revolving doors of politicians & the news media scrum along with the monarchy in Westminster.

I am legally entitled to peacefully live in my own home in Breizh, France with my own identity, free from draconian adoption legislation.

The Chief Commissioner of Police in Victoria who is legally responsible for the unlawful arrests of me on 21st December 2021, inside and outside courts in Melbourne, Australia because I have officially renounced draconian adoption legislation, is illegally stopping me living in my own home, in Breizh, France. It is entirely political, because the Chief Commissioner of Victorian Police did not have any legal grounds to arrest me because I have officially renounced draconian adoption legislation. It cannot be a crime for me to renounce a seriously bogus adoption ‘court order’ (case 352, May 1963) and draconian adoption legislation so I can freely live my own life like people who are not labelled ‘adopted’ by draconian adoption legislation. I have been illegally stopped from living in my own home in Breizh, France since July 2019 for entirely… political reasons.

It is illegal for the Chief Commissioner of Police in Victoria to stop me living in my own home outside Australia, and worse, in the full knowledge I have no home in Australia !! It is seriously perverse for politicians and police to intentionally make someone labelled ‘adopted’… homeless !!!! using draconian adoption legislation.

The State of Victoria, including the police, are legally liable for all the costs of, including compensation, resulting from their stopping me living in my own home, free from draconian adoption legislation.

My renouncing, draconian adoption legislation that has never caused me anything but problems, cannot legally be used to stop me living with my own identity, in my own home.

The arbitrary world of draconian adoption legislation is like a hidden and unaccountable far from legal system.

It is self evident draconian adoption legislation was nullified (and subject to civil jury nullification) on Mothers Day 2006 in the UK. That is after all, why I have a High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008, in the UK covered up by Tory, Labour & Lib Dem (Johnson, Livingstone & Paddick) London Mayoral Candidates (the Mayor of London is boss of the top cop) in May 2008 & 2012 etc before the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me. The now British PM (former Mayor of London) and Leader of the Opposition (former DPP) have always illegally refused to hand over the CCTV to me, after the government had… already been found by a court to have illegally destroyed independent video footage from the same date, several years earlier of a similar incident. Australian politicians employed Sir Ken Jones fmr Head of ACPO in the UK, as DAC in Victoria with a promise of Australian citizenship while illegally using draconian adoption legislation etc to try and deny I am an Australian citizen.The former British Lib Dem MP Mr Huhne who sat himself next to me at Channel Four on 7th February 2007 (when Brian won the most politically inspiring person of the year) had the same ‘PR’ rep he later married, who acted for the Met’s former Lord Paddick in the London Mayor elections too, while everyone was falling all over each other to illegally hide my being on the witness stand on 21st June 2010, before trying to cover up my ‘winning’ HQ11X00563 too etc etc. It is undeniable that the former Australian Labor PM Rudd only secured a $1.4 billion contract from the British Tories and Lib Dems in 2011 for Ingeus that he personally financially benefited from, by covering up that I won HQ11X00563 in January 2011 over Mothers Day 2006 etc. It transpired the PRSR Act 2011 legislation the British government then passed against me that was illegally used on 16th January 2012, was to illegally try and cover up my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 etc in the upcoming London Mayoral elections in May 2012 that still involved the same ‘candidates’. Blair et al had only abused public office to wage the Iraq war, while legislating as much inequality as possible in the UK.

A fundamental problem is/was the completely politicised draconian adoption legislation being used against me excluded me from participating not only with my own identity, but without the bogus adoption ‘court order’. The draconian adoption legislation is only about the accumulation of unlawful state power and has never had anything to do with the best interests of someone labelled ‘adopted’. The draconian adoption legislation is about punishment without law. The draconian adoption legislation does not as a starting point care about the health of someone labelled adopted because politicians have always claimed they can with-hold medical information from someone labelled ‘adopted’.

I was exiled from the UK in April 2013 and obviously did not voluntarily return to Australia in 2019 because my own… home !! is in Breizh, France. I did when asked provide a signed statutory declaration in Australia about my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 and the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me, and the fact I won for example HQ11X00563 which has all just been covered up. The ‘policy’ of Australian politicians is to cover up the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me as an Australian citizen, because I am labelled ‘adopted’. It is the adoption ‘court order’ and draconian adoption legislation being illegally used against me, stopping me from living in my own home, with my own identity.

I personally support the equality of opportunity for everyone of the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy that includes civil juries and jury nullification of unlawful legislation, instead of politicians and the news media scrums soap opera about monarchy that only promotes imposing perpetual inequality. The only identifiable purpose of the not so Australian Constitution is for the monarchy to keep a foot in the door. It is after all misleading to claim there needs to be a referendum on having a monarchy because if the monarchy had good manners they would for example have officially renounced the institution of monarchy long ago.

Most people would support an International Civil Court with the choice of civil juries, for civilian populations, that would have always meant it was possible to have legally reviewable care arrangements vulnerable children automatically age out of at adulthood.

3.
The Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police did not reasonably believe I could lawfully be arrested inside or outside any court in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia on 21st December 2021 because I did as someone labelled ‘adopted’ officially renounce draconian adoption legislation.

I am in no way legally obliged to recognise draconian adoption legislation and I could not legally be arrested by Victoria Police for officially renouncing draconian adoption legislation.

The most politicians or courts could have legally done is legally challenge my officially renouncing draconian adoption legislation, before a civil jury that I have never waived my legal right to, but they never did.

There is nothing but complete disrespect from politicians et al towards anyone labelled adopted by their draconian adoption legislation who opposes that.

The Victorian Police had no legal grounds to arrest me inside or outside any court because I have officially renounced draconian adoption legislation. Its clearly unlawful for politicians, courts and police to unlawfully arrest me to try and pretend I have not legally officially renounced draconian adoption legislation.

The Victorian Police wer actually legally obliged to at most witness that I have officially renounced draconian adoption legislation which I am legally entitled to do.

The legal reality is there is no legal justification for draconian adoption legislation in any circumstances because it is self evident it is not legally possible to say someone who is labelled adopted does not have the same right to make our own decisions that children and adults who are not labelled adopted do.

It could never be said that draconian adoption legislation has any respect whatsoever for someone labelled adopted.

The sole intention of the breach of public trust that is draconian adoption legislation has always been the accumulation of state power, not the best interests of children or any child protection.

There is no way I should ever have been put in the position in the first place of being told I had to go to the court that did the dirty deed of the onerous ‘court order’ against me to argue over that, because there is no way the lifelong ‘court order’ imposing ‘adoption’ could possibly have ever been valid. I was not even voluntarily in Australia and I did not voluntarily go to the court, and the circumstances of my own case means politicians have breached non refoulement.

I know this to be true because in my own case, my own parents automatically ‘aged out of’ now defunct legislation used against them that resulted in the unseemly haste of my ‘adoption’, yet my case was never a) legally reviewed and b) nor did I ‘automatically age out’ of draconian adoption legislation as an adult. So I was forced to leave Australia as a teenager because I was not grateful about being labelled adopted because I was treated so differently from even the people who posed as my parents etc. My little sister I was raised separately from, who had the same parents ’suddenly’ died shortly after I found her and shortly before she was due to come and live with me in the UK.

There are obviously problems not just with politicians et al switching my identity, nationalities and citizenships, but with the false premise it is legally possible to impose something so… onerous as a lifelong adoption ’court order’ which is a very serious legal issue.

The Australian politicians illegally actually withheld the supposed ‘court order’ about my alleged ‘adoption’ that I only saw what is alleged to be a copy in July 2019. Indeed the court that had me unlawfully arrested in December 2021 had never served the ‘court order’ on me, as even an adult !!

There has been no reasonable prospect for a long time, I could get access to any proper medical treatment for my multiple auto-immune and related illnesses while there is still the fraudulent ‘court order’ and the related draconian adoption legislation.

The Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police is not legally entitled to effectively aid and abet the British PM Johnson by using draconian adoption legislation against me.

It is clearly illegal to restrict my freedom of movement by refusing to issue me with an Australian passport in my own identity simply because I have officially renounced draconian adoption legislation, I am not legally obliged to recognise.

It should also be the government who pay for all the documents issued in my adopted name to be issued in my real name.

The politicians have continually legislated what are really manipulative excuses about adoption they have never bothered to inform people labelled adopted about because there is nothing about any of the draconian adoption legislation that could ever be lawful in the global free for all of the adoption industry that includes the Hague Adoption Convention. There is no agreement over draconian adoption legislation in the European Union.

A kinder evolution is possible.

This statement is true.

Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)