Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: A… criminal jury has… already found (what a civil jury could only confirm) the only political… excuse for my not living in my own home in Breizh, France with compensation incl a free Australian passport in my own identity is because two-faced corrupt former Australian ‘$1.4 billion dollar’ PM & FM Rudd is still illegally laundering money from Coalition & Labour… political parties et al hiding groundhog day of Mothers Day 2006 incl my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 & the premeditated political torture & attempted murder of me etc etc (15.02.2022)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The only real (and what became an) outstanding $1.4 billion dollar ‘question’ is why do I not… already have a free Australian passport in my own identity because there are no legal reasons for politicians et al to restrict my peaceful freedom of expression and movement.
I do understandably personally reasonably believe, the truth is Johnson et al did not go ahead with the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me without first getting the nod from Rudd when he was Australian PM. Rudd had a personal motive to have me illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010. I happened to be an entirely ordinary law abiding private citizen, who did not have the slightest idea I was standing in the way of Rudd’s… ego.
____________
Notes:
The groundhog day over 26th March Mothers Day… 2006:
The two-faced corrupt former Australian PM & FM Rudd who has specifically never cared about… vulnerable children separated from their own families, who he has always and will always cynically… exploit to make money for himself broke the law when he corruptly breached the public trust placed in him as a politician.
(I remember the British government admitted in several consecutive court proceedings I won in 2007 over the groundhog day of Mothers Day 2006, they were illegally using Special Branch against us, at the same time some people who were posing as campaigners with us, then suddenly re-branded themselves as a different campaign, that nevertheless still… publicly sought to portray itself as a campaign ‘within’ our campaign, to try and continue)
There could never be any legal reason to use any state agency to try and illegally stop civil jury nullifications of legislation, and it was illegal for politicians to hide the identity of their not so unknown assailant who violently punched me in the head before he was hidden by the Palaces of Westminster et al.
My own prescient ‘landmark’ Contempt of Court… ruling I made in front of a President of the Queens Bench Division et al in December 2008 in the UK while they peered over their spectacles at me, before exiting stage left to try and spin a more ‘ambiguous’ version, nevertheless in practise overtook the more widely published case about Brian and myself from November 2007.
The 26th March… 2009 spin in the run up to G20 (that Rudd claimed in 2013 he helped found in 2008, and he attended in London in 2009) using an anarchist monarchist ’anthropologist’ who turned out to be an agent provocateur distracting from… adoption:
A so called ‘anthropologist’ called Professor Chris Knight whose ‘legend’ lacks any basic intellectual or educational rigour, let alone honesty, was actually… deployed by the police et al to draw people… away from Parliament Square, Central London to the City of London. This meant that apart from the… usual political attempts to try and stop people campaigning in Parliament Square, Central London, politicians could then travel at leisure down the road from Buckingham Palace, to go through the Treasury & Foreign Office entrance by Parliament Square, Central London, for their evening banquet. (The press were all gathered further along on the green on Millbank, which is past the other side of Parliament Square) So, it so happened I was one of three people standing there, when the motorcade of the for example US President at that time, happened to have his window wound down, on one of the ‘beasts’ when he was caught in a long queue entering the Treasury and Foreign Office entrance, while I happened to unexpectedly find myself standing there with a loudspeaker, literally only a few feet away. I spontaneously gave my torture speech where the words I was meant to say that I had never publicly spoken before, just came to me, and were said. (The real whole security operation including visible snipers on rooftops was actually in Westminster by Parliament Square, and not the City of London. It is notable that the G20 world leaders came to Parliament Square, Central London and we were not searched)
The belated British spin about spying at the G20 in 2009 is rather a distraction from the fact most people know governments often routinely spy on… law abiding private citizens. It would only be… surprising if British politicians… were not spying on law abiding private citizens:
(It was not so long afterwards on the 11th April 2009 that I said I refused to in any way be confused with or ‘associated’ with the so called campaign trying to be a campaign ‘within’ our campaign, after I was unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned before very seriously being further mugged at knife-point. The campaign that was then no longer ‘within’ our campaign, although they kept trying to join themselves with us, grew into what we publicly called the ‘police camp’ (of course the government stole our sign that publicly said that) who called themselves ‘Democracy Village’ between May 2010 – May 2012, that included ‘organizers’ like a Professor Chris Knight, who also later spun off into what was called ‘Occupy London’ at St Paul’s Cathedral. It is common practice for governments to try and ‘influence’ any campaign, but it was illegal when the purpose was only to try and stop jury nullification of legislation)
The politicians primary purpose with ‘Democracy Village’ was to try and avoid a showdown with Brian and myself in the European ECHR who could only remit our case to at the very least a civil jury over nullification of legislation. The publicly stated objective of what was really a particularly monarchist ‘Democracy Village’ was to (like government agencies try and)… occupy Parliament Square, Central London to try and… exclude peaceful freedom of expression by law abiding private citizens. I was never personally bothered if I campaigned in Parliament Square, or for example outside Downing Street in Whitehall or Trafalgar Square, and it was only the government who had tried to confine me to Parliament Square, when Southwark Crown Court (completely unexpectedly) declared on 8th March 2007 that Parliament Square was my… ‘home’ which was not how I ever looked at it. The monarchy did in effect try and claim ‘adverse possession’ in 2008 (we did not know about until 2010) of an unspecified part of the public space of Parliament Square, Central London, politicians had purported through the GLA Act of 1999 they could just give away to the monarchy (who it turned out also claimed part of the Palaces of Westminster in 2008 too) I just always properly stated that Parliament Square, Central London should remain a public space in perpetuity.
It is a matter of court record that the malicious prosecution brought by the now British PM Johnson while Mayor of London that began on 26th May 2010 (which was separated by the government from our unlawful arrests on 25th May 2010) was only originally initiated against Brian and myself. It was only when I stated I would challenge it that (it was later admitted in court) Johnson then had a ‘private’ meeting with the ‘organizers’ of (his) ‘Democracy Village’ to decide who they would put forward against us who the court would then also try to illegally ‘join’ to us in court proceedings. Brian and I were the only two people originally publicly named who had no ‘choice’ unlike the ‘Democracy Village’ who were nothing to do with us, but were always hell bent on covering up the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me.
It is a matter of public record that I publicly stated on the witness stand while on oath on 21st June 2010 in the High Court that (for example) a Professor Chris Knight (who I specifically named) was an agent provocateur (who was involved in my unlawful arrest at the State Opening on 25th May 2010 during an illegal search, because I was literally holding a bundle of… perjured government witness statements pointing out the political lies and excuses including over December 2008 etc)
The BBC illegally edited and spliced different audio (there are two copies of video by the police and ourselves that put together show what I really said and in… the proper context):
I was… literally holding up a bundle of demonstrably … perjured witness statements on 25th May 2010 which is obviously not something politicians et al were too keen to broadcast:
The government had very unusually completely closed off all around Parliament Square including… to pedestrians, so there would not be any independent… members of the public, which there would usually be, to witness what happened. I said the politicians so called ‘Democracy Village’ were more like… zombies, because they simply did not behave at all like ordinary members of the public (because their actual… job was to try and pretend what was happening was not happening which was quite… surreal in… real time)
The only two people the government did not let publicly comment were Brian and myself who were illegally detained for 36 hours so Johnson could leg it to the High Court… before we were released (because politicians knew from what we did say, we would at the very least go there because the government were also illegally refusing to hand over the CCTV of the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me)
The so called ’Democracy Village’ were truly… vile creatures, completely devoid of any human attributes like consciences (and of course the definition of under-covers is political ‘street theatre’ which was what Knight claimed he was doing)
It was witnessed that when I then left the High Court on 21st June 2010 a Daily Mail journalist followed me and tried to doorstop me in the lift (when I was very clearly extremely traumatized) and I refused to speak with them because I said they were involved in my unlawful arrests which the journalist who had been in court admitted was true, before the Daily Mail later only publicly admitted… outside of any court proceedings, they were part of ‘Democracy Village’.
One of the main reasons the Judge then closed the court to the press and public before I was also illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010 on the same day Rudd switched political roles in Australia for his own personal commercial reasons, was (not so much the Judge’s own ‘conflict of interest’ over December 2008 that had repeatedly become a serious legal issue on May 25th 2010 too) but even more importantly because it was a matter of court record, I had given… evidence that was true on the witness stand under oath in the High Court that was also never challenged or disputed, in court including by ‘Democracy Village’.
The politics in… Australia in June 2010, were a sideshow compared to what was going on in Parliament Square, Central London in the UK:
The only thing politicians and the news media scrum could then do is allude to the issue of agent provocateurs more generally in various round about ways outside court proceedings without directly asking… me, including to comment because I… had actually given evidence under oath on the witness stand that was not disputed… in court. The politicians and news media scrum could not… change or deny what I had said under oath on the witness stand in the High Court on the… court record.
** I do understandably personally reasonably believe, the truth is Johnson et al did not go ahead with the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me without first getting the nod from Rudd when he was Australian PM. Rudd had a personal motive to have me illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010.
(It is entirely natural that of course I would not want to or ever voluntarily return to Australia because I want to get on with my own life free from draconian adoption legislation. I didn’t choose my own… home in Breizh, France for any… political reasons)
I ‘won’ round one in the Court of Appeal in 2010 before the now British PM Johnson went while Mayor of London, for round two to try and… distract from I also really won the satellite litigation of HQ11X00563 in… January 2011 (long before Johnson’s grandstanding in April 2011) and not as they claimed in May 2012 etc.
It was only ever all about trying to avoid a legal showdown with a civil or criminal jury over jury nullification of legislation.
The reality I saw, was a Professor Chris Knight was one of the people who only ever turned up to Parliament Square for… pre-arranged ‘interviews’ with the corporate news media scrum posing as a ‘spokesman’ for what we called the ‘police camp’ who called themselves ‘Democracy Village’. Knight, and a person he called Mike Raddie who never appeared in court (but did grandstand on Russian TV) were both involved in my unlawful arrest at the State Opening on 25th May 2010 but they never actually stayed/camped over in Parliament Square, Central London with their ‘Democracy Village’.
I later personally witnessed while in Parliament Square, Central London during the student protests against the Lib Dems later in 2010 over the political lies about student fees (not long after Johnson brought ‘round two’ against Brian and myself) that the Professor Chris Knight was let through police lines by police, with a loudspeaker, where I heard him publicly call for people (presumably other agent provocateurs) to smash the windows in the Treasury building next to Parliament Square, Central London.
I had of course… already given evidence under oath in the High Court that Knight was an agent provocateur.
In early 2011, Channel Four then incredibly asked me to participate in a supposed ‘documentary’ labelled ‘the alternative/unofficial royal wedding’ I absolutely refused to participate in or be associated with (I had also by then in practical terms won HQ11X00563) because I specifically pointed out to Channel 4 I was not going to be ‘associated’ with… Professor Chris Knight, who was one of two other people they had asked to participate who I had… already given evidence in the High Court I was… not going to change that he was an… agent provocateur, who was then tasked with publicly spinning ‘pre-crime’ arrests that could only mean him grandstanding to try and hide… me being set up for… another unlawful arrest under the cover of a royal wedding, like at the State Opening on May 25th 2010.
A Duke of… York & Agincourt etc:
It was so out of order to be asked by Channel 4 to… participate in a so called ‘documentary’ with someone (Professor Knight) who had… already been very publicly involved in an… unlawful arrest of me !! The Channel Four staff did admit I wasn’t even the only person who did not want to in any way be associated with Knight, including because he was an… agent provocateur.
(I later refused to have anything to do with the Russian government media when they contacted me in 2016. Russia is obviously also part of the ECHR, because it is a matter of… court record I had… already publicly given evidence on a witness stand under oath in a court of law, which was never disputed in any court, that Professor Chris Knight was an agent provocateur. This was while Moscow were openly on very good terms with Westminster at that time, and had also promoted Professor Knight et al as a real campaigner with ‘Democracy Village’. The anarchists in ’Democracy Village’ were complete… monarchists, and while a Professor Chris Knight was spinning the Channel Four ‘alternative/unofficial royal wedding’, the rest of the so called ‘Democracy Village’ were literally using their freedom of expression to publicly promote… a royal wedding while I was in Parliament Square, Central London. The overall impression of the so called ‘Democracy Village’ if you consistently actually saw what they did, rather than what they and the news media scrum said they did, was they were… monarchists)
The question Rudd could never answer either:
There’s obviously quite a few… outright lies Rudd told while hiding behind public office with an entourage of lawyers:
There are those who prefer to grandstand for a primarily corporate and male dominated news media scrum because it is obviously much easier than having an accurate and contemporaneous court record of being caught out lying under oath on a witness stand in a court of law and particularly with a civil or criminal jury.
Rudd is so corrupt:
There is no excuse for the use of… agent provocateurs to try and stop civil jury nullification of legislation, that resulted in my winning with a criminal jury anyway in May 2013.
Donna Bugat 