Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: I established universal… legal precedent I was not legally obliged to leave my own home in Breizh, France & return to Australia in July 2019 to… officially renounce draconian adoption legislation & receive compensation, because I had already ‘won’ without returning to UK when I proved beyond all reasonable doubt with a… criminal jury on 8th May 2013 that Johnson et al are guilty of illegally hiding … civil jury nullification on Mothers Day 2006 & my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 & premeditated political torture & attempted murder of me with 48+ unlawful arrests and false imprisonments etc (07.02.2022)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I was born in Carlton, Melbourne, in Victoria, Australia and I have two beautiful adult sons who were born and live in New Zealand and the UK. They are also Australian citizens by descent, because my ‘lived experience’ of draconian adoption legislation means they have never lived in Australia.
The State of Victoria unreasonably uses onerous draconian adoption legislation that is completely… unnecessary in all circumstances, that undeniably ‘put in place a sequence of events’ that has… already caused me prolonged life threatening physical and emotional harm.
My own parents automatically ‘aged out’ of now defunct legislation used against them that resulted in my being adopted, while politicians have always falsely claimed I do not automatically ‘age out’ of draconian adoption legislation.
The fact draconian adoption legislation is completely… unnecessary means it is legally unnecessary to even ‘argue’ if its… use is… disproportionate. The biggest ‘secrets and lies’ about adoption are from politicians because draconian adoption legislation is completely unnecessary in all circumstances in a civilised and democratic society.
A witness statement that cannot be refused by politicians et al, is the most fundamental and basic principle of the peace and harmony of the rule of law.
It is only legally possible to have legally reviewable ‘care arrangements’ until adulthood for vulnerable children separated from their own families, for any number of reasons that could happen to anyone. The fact draconian adoption legislation is a political… excuse rather than a legal option, means that when it is no longer possible for draconian adoption legislation to be used, that the only legal alternative of legally reviewable ‘care arrangements’ for vulnerable children until adulthood can genuinely help improve outcomes for all vulnerable children separated from their own families. The use of legally reviewable ‘care arrangements’ until adulthood for vulnerable children separated from their own families for any number of reasons that could happen to anyone, could help restore public trust in politicians.
It is clearly absolutely unlawful to arrest and imprison etc an adopted person to try and stop jury nullification of legislation.
The BBC & New Scotland Yard:
I established a universal… legal precedent through my ‘lived experience’ of draconian adoption legislation that means I was not legally obliged to leave my own home in Breizh, France & return to Australia in July 2019 to… officially renounce draconian adoption legislation & receive compensation, because…
The ‘black site’:
… I had already ‘won’ without returning to UK when I proved beyond all reasonable doubt with a… criminal jury on 8th May 2013 (which was confirmed on 20th May 2013) that Johnson et al are guilty of illegally hiding … civil jury nullification on Mothers Day 2006 & my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 & the premeditated political torture & attempted murder of me with 48+ unlawful arrests and false imprisonments etc.
I did not become and was never a criminal because I was in Parliament Square, Central London.
The most important lesson I learned in Parliament Square, Central London, was that most members of the public did not consider we were… criminals by being there, regardless of any combination of the revolving doors of political administrations and the news media scrum.
(The reason the political classes like grandstanding for the news media scrum is because the news media scrum receive the bulk of the tax payer dime, for what is called political ‘advertising’ by politicians throughout every year. The Labour government in the State of Victoria, and Liberal and National Coalition Federal government in Australia are currently the biggest two out of the three major ‘advertisers’ in Australia)
The email 20th May 2013:
I had in fact… already while supposedly on bail… returned to the UK (that I had also done in previous years) for the criminal jury trial that was adjourned without any reasons being given, or my agreement, because I had obviously already won, before the criminal jury trial was ‘re-scheduled’ for May 2013, solely so Johnson et al could try and find any further false pretext to try and unlawfully arrest me to at best try and remand me to prison. Neil was after all, unlawfully arrested with a bogus unsigned warrant (Johnson as boss of the top New Scotland Yard cop knew about) on 10th April 2013 when we left the High Court after Neil… accompanied me to a superfluous hearing a government lawyer (and not court staff, contacted me about the previous evening the government lawyer, first said I had to go to, that I was not legally obliged to go to) The government were only ridiculously continuing to try and find any… excuse for me to not have (my legal right of) a… civil jury in my unprecedented lawsuits that unusually constituted a ‘class action’ by a single person, although I am a witness in other cases too. The government subsequently claimed the bogus unsigned warrant used on Neil when he accompanied me to the High Court that the government continued to try and use around the country, even after he was released by a Magistrates court and in the knowledge the ‘case’ could not and did not ever go ahead, existed… before we returned to the UK. There was however no warrant flagged when Neil and I returned to the UK, and we had both our passports immediately taken off us, at Calais, on the false pretext we would be interviewed which did not happen before our passports were later handed back to us without further comment. (So in a legal sense we were illegally detained at Calais because our passports had been taken from us, including without providing any legal basis which had previously happened to me at Stansted)
In fact, Johnson had previously and very publicly maliciously prosecuted Brian while he was in Germany including while Brian was in hospital, in Bremen in Germany, which he had also previously tried to do when Brian was in two hospitals in the UK, and all while I was in the UK, and traveling back and forth. It is more likely than not that the reason my legal ‘victory’ at Southwark Crown Court in the UK on 8th May 2013 was not formally acknowledged until 20th May 2013, is because Johnson would have still been trying to maliciously prosecute me for ‘failing to appear’ even though I ‘won’ by a) email b) while supposedly on bail c) without returning to the UK (… again after the trial was previously adjourned without anyone giving reasons and without my agreement before it was ‘re-scheduled’ for May 2013) d) with a criminal jury.
The undeniable evidence is Johnson et al did and would always try to… maliciously prosecute someone who was a carer, or healthcare worker, or while a patient in a hospital in the UK or elsewhere.
The pretender Johnson had always undeniably lied to the public and then as the British Tory PM from July 2019, to the British Parliament, because he had to while a Tory MP lie (with the… agreement of the former Labour Mayor of London Livingstone et al) to even become Mayor of London, in 2008 and continue in 2012, and to also become British PM in July 2019.
I am an adopted person who was always legally entitled to… officially renounce draconian adoption legislation (like I did with the political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005) inside or outside any court of law.
A person is legally entitled to ‘any legal representation of their choosing’ that includes a McKenzie friend. The politicians always sought to illegally stop campaign members in Parliament Square, Central London, giving evidence for each other, while politicians just used courts as a further means of state oppression.
In fact, we should always have been able to instruct a McKenzie friend to appear in court for us, so we could just concentrate on our campaigning instead, because any court cases only resulted from ‘serious procedural irregularities’ by politicians et al.
I also advocate for independent juries and (the only chartist reform not incorporated into democracy of) annual elections for all politicians, including maximum terms of public office regardless of any combination of political roles, to help strengthen the peace and harmony of the rule of law and more inclusive and mature democracy. The soap opera of monarchy parroted predominantly by the news media scrum can only perpetuate the corruption of cronyism.
I personally discovered (putting to one side the politics of draconian adoption legislation) I preferred living in my own home in Breizh, France (that had nothing to do with anyone else’s politics) I was not legally obliged to leave my own home in Breizh, France and return to Australia in July 2019 to… officially renounce draconian adoption legislation and receive compensation.
My pioneering two part compensation includes:
a) a person of any race, religion, politics or none who has been adopted having the choice to voluntarily and unconditionally receive the equivalent of $3000 Australian dollars per month, tax free that cannot be ‘means tested’ in any way, along with universal free healthcare of our choosing regardless of where we live or choose to live that also serves as a real universal basic income because people who are adopted come from all walks of life from all around the world and cannot be expected to keep ‘starting over’ in any circumstances.
(that would in my own case be paid by the State of Victoria)
b) exemplary and aggravated damages in individual cases that in my own case should be $1.4 billion tax free dollars (again paid by the State of Victoria)
(I should be able to collect my compensation from the Supreme Court in Melbourne, in Victoria)
A kinder evolution is possible
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
__________________
Notes on ‘politics’:
The legal reality is the former British Labour PM Blair, and former top cop and now Lord Blair along with the former Mayor of London Livingstone (whose personal and business interests clearly do not support the peace and harmony of the rule of law or democracy) were legally obliged to at the very least resign on Mothers Day 2006.
The British and Australian politicians always sought to pass the buck between each other because I am adopted.
The facts include the British so called Labour Leader of the Opposition Starmer was always legally compromised in his role as the DPP, because of his own business interests in Doughty Chambers, and our cases. It was Starmer’s Doughty Chambers who originally made a seriously ‘incomplete’ case stated about the political ban on peaceful freedom of expression of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 on the ‘Ides of March’ 2006 they purported to ‘argue’ with courts over until June 2007. Doughty’s knew their ‘case stated’ had been swiftly overtaken by my own… civil jury lawsuit on Mothers Day 2006 about jury nullification of legislation.
The political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation was like draconian adoption legislation never… necessary in a democratic society, so it was legally unnecessary to even argue if its… use was… proportionate.
It was on 8th March 2007 that a judge at Southwark Crown Court had unexpectedly declared Parliament Square, Central London was my ‘home’ that I did not ask him to do or ever seek. This was because the truth was politicians did not want us to extend our small campaign to for example include outside Downing Street (where the government did not like members of the public speaking to us, or the ‘tourist’ photos of us there, where people could also see our unlawful arrests up close and hear what was said to us etc) in Whitehall or Trafalgar Square which was said at that time to be outside the area for ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005. Somehow ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 did not include politicians and the news media scrum et al in ‘Westminster Village’ who were also at that particular time spinning the con-artist Wallinger’s ‘State Britain’ rip off in the Tate Britain in Millbank, that turned out to be financed by the err… government. I did always personally properly state that Parliament Square, Central London should remain a public space in perpetuity (regardless of the free for all among various governments agencies and departments etc trying to lay claim/adverse possession and so on and so forth). I was while in Parliament Square, Central London in the area encompassing what is usually called ‘Westminster Village’ while not being of ‘Westminster Village’.
It is clear that after my decisive legal ‘victory’ … without a jury at Southwark Crown Court on 13th December 2007 (on the same day the Labour PM Brown was late signing the Lisbon Treaty about a referendum on the EU) that involved Lord Blair illegally editing CCTV and illegally destroying independent video footage that when Johnson then became Mayor of London in May 2008 (which actually required Labour’s… Livingstone to… agree to help try and cover up Mothers Day 2006 and my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 that Johnson et al illegally refused to hand over CCTV to me, from then on.
The government was also unhappy that two CPS lawyers had traced me through the legal system and had come forward as witnesses for me in a case when I had been… maliciously targeted outside Downing Street, when I was first tortured, while Labour’s Livingstone et al were doing a march in Whitehall in August 2006.
The politicians did not want either a civil or criminal… jury to ever see what they were violently orchestrating ‘behind closed doors’ out of public view, to illegally try and stop jury nullification of legislation.
It turned out the Charing Cross police station was disbanded from the top down after 13th December 2007 (albeit the more junior police involved in our cases, mostly just spread out between other stations in Westminster) while Johnson publicly took responsibility for sacking Lord Blair in 2008 (while the real agreement was the now Blair would after a suitable time be elevated to the unelected House of Lords for the obvious reasons). Lord Blair was not known for being keen for his victims to be able to make witness statements.
The now British PM Johnson did surround himself with an extraordinary number of ‘advisers’ while he was Mayor of London and held court at City Hall (while Southwark Crown Court where he should have been on trial was pretty much next door) A now Australian Liberal Senator McGrath who was his chief ‘political’ adviser was supposedly sacked by Johnson in 2008 too.
In fact, Johnson later started bringing back senior police officers into the fold, at New Scotland Yard etc, because they still had the motive to maliciously target me, while the Australian Federal and State Labour party of Rudd et al installed a Sir Ken Jones who was Head of ACPO in the UK as the DAC in Victoria where he was also offered Australian citizenship which was clearly conditional on ensuring my civil jury lawsuits never went ahead (while Australian politicians had by contrast illegally tried to deny I have Australian citizenship)
A jury would never find credible the outlandish claims often repeated by an Australian called Lynton Crosby (whose business interests have never been about the peace and harmony of the rule of law or democracy either) that he won the Mayoral elections in 2008 & 2012 for Johnson and the Tory general election in 2015. In fact Johnson completely relied on the agreement of… Labour’s Livingstone covering up my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008, over Mothers Day 2006 and the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me. The British Lib Dems lost all the seats they had gained in the hung parliament of 2010 in the UK in the 2015 election because they had lied about student fees too. (Blair was arguably elected because he used the weasel words about ‘reform’ of the unelected House of Lords) The politicians focused on putting the referendum on the EU on the political agenda in 2015, before the general elections in 2017 and 2019 only highlighted a convergence between all the political parties who use Brexit to distract from the anomalous unelected British House of Lords too that includes members from all the political parties. It is more likely than not, that the result of the British referendum on the EU in 2016 could be reversed more quickly than it has been possible to prove draconian adoption legislation is completely unnecessary, because draconian adoption legislation has been so entrenched and ‘normalized’ for so long, in so many countries.
There were 100 lawyers who resigned from the IPCC (now called IOPC) on the watch of the current Victorian Ombudsman, Glass while she was a Commissioner at the IPCC in the UK, with a person called Nick Hardwick, who claimed he didn’t keep any record of his meeting with the MET Police Authority (now MOPAC) et al… he publicly claimed he had at 8am on the 8th December 2006 (at the feast of their not so ‘immaculate concept’) about Brian and myself, that Brian and myself were not even invited to.
It took Brian and myself several years to get an actual ‘official’ CD recording of a hearing in the High Court in 2008 when Brian asked a Justice Collins (who opposed an ‘official’ recording being handed over) what would Europe (the ECHR) say about him denying legal representation to me, because his version of Article 11 ‘Freedom of Assembly’ was that it was illegal for (one of) two whole people (me) to campaign together. It had been somewhat ‘confusingly’ argued it was illegal for me to campaign with Brian, but it was not illegal for Brian to campaign with me. A Justice Collins passed the buck further along the Judicial line to a President of the Queens Bench Division, a Lord Justice May and his sidekick in December 2008. I was blunt at that hearing in December 2008 with my… own real ‘landmark’ Contempt of Court… ruling in the… High Court (that in any legal sense replaced the published supposedly ‘landmark’ High Court Contempt of Court case about Brian and myself from 2007, that originated in the Magistrates Court) about what it is legal for a member of the public to say in the… High Court.
I was further illegally denied legal representation in the High Court in the UK on 23rd June 2010 (in a… malicious prosecution brought by Johnson) by the same sidekick of Lord Justice May who was present when I made my… own ‘landmark’ ruling on Contempt of Court in the High Court in December 2008 (when I was not threatened with any alleged Contempt of Court) before he then tried to threaten me with Contempt of Court on 21st June 2010 when I was legally ‘blowing the whistle’ while under oath on the witness stand before the Judge left the court instead, because I was unmoved.
The Judge didn’t want to produce the actual recording from December 2008 of what I said in one sentence that was my own, and very real ‘landmark’ Contempt of Court… ruling.
(The 23rd June 2010 was also the same day the for example Australian Labour PM Rudd flipped to become Foreign Secretary)
It turned out a Paul Harris SC who works for Doughty (supposedly in Hong Kong) who I had never actually met or instructed before he was imposed on me, and purported to briefly represent me, had failed to disclose his very serious ‘conflict of interest’ (before he too illegally tried to stop me ‘blowing the whistle’ while on the witness stand in the High Court on June 21st 2010 before I ‘won’ the malicious prosecution brought against me by Johnson using the false pretext of ‘trespass’ in the Court of Appeal, before Johnson set about round two (that could not logically have had anything to do with me) and was while Brian was in Germany, including in hospital. However the legal reality is while Johnson was grandstanding about having ‘round two’ (while Brian was in Germany) I had in reality ‘won’ a different HQ11X00563 in January 2011 which was fronted by Westminster Council but involved Johnson et al too (long before 4th May 2012 when Johnson and Livingstone had done the rounds about another Mayoral election which I do not even personally remember because I was being subjected to so much state violence) I remember shortly afterwards, that one of Johnson’s now former wives from his harem, not only posed as a ‘human rights’ lawyer defending him (his latest partner was at that time posing as yet another ‘adviser’) when she gave her ten pence worth in the London Evening Standard on the 18th May 2012, about the political distraction of new legislation being very violently against me, at that time, by her own partner, Johnson. (I just responded that if the now another former partner of Johnson was a real human rights lawyer, she wouldn’t want to see people being arrested and lose their jobs because they peacefully opposed politicians) The former and current members of Johnson’s harem did know the distraction of the ‘new’ legislation (after ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005) only happened because Johnson was responsible for the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me to further his own political career. The former Australian Labour PM & FM Rudd also undeniably knew his partner only collected a $1.4 billion dollar brown envelope from the British Tories while… Rudd was himself in public office, because they both agreed to illegally cover up the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me, which was the worst kept ‘secret’ in ‘Westminster Village’.
I have nevertheless established an important universal legal precedent or two.
Donna Bugat 