Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: I was not legally obliged to leave my own… home in Breizh, France to… officially renounce draconian adoption legislation & receive compensation; it is a legal impossibility for British PM Johnson or anyone else to ever change… result, I proved while supposedly on bail & without returning to UK, with a… criminal jury in May 2013 he was guilty beyond all reasonable doubt of premeditated political torture & attempted murder of me to cover up… civil jury Mothers Day 2006 & my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 etc (31.01.2022)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I didn’t choose to be adopted as a small child in Carlton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, but I did choose as a law abiding private citizen and mother who is a responsible adult to defend peaceful freedom of expression for everyone, in Parliament Square, Central London in the UK.
The Australian politicians knew that even while I was in Parliament Square, Central London, I was legally entitled to a fee exemption in the UK, in inextricably linked adoption and habeas corpus cases, just like in the Supreme Court in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. I should have had legal representation too, regardless of the additional political facade of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation.
The politicians with their publicly funded entourage of lawyers knew on Mothers Day 2006 (when I had a civil jury lawsuit) that jury nullification of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 would inevitably result in jury nullification of draconian adoption legislation too. So they illegally leaked my adopted name with other false information to try and distract with the ubiqitious news media scrum instead.
The fact there were some people who went along with politicians ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation, just like some adopted people go along with draconian adoption legislation for all sorts of reasons, and despite not everyone being treated equally or legislation not affecting everyone, didn’t and doesn’t legally change both were and are not necessary, proportionate or legal in a democratic society.
There was no legal difference between the Tory Johnson as Mayor of London, and Labour’s Livingstone et al using ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 etc.
There have never been any legal grounds to ‘trespass’ on my person:
The now British PM Johnson has always exploited the fact courts and governments do not keep accurate and contemporaneous legal records of any prolonged and life threatening physical and emotional harm caused to an adopted person as a child or adult by draconian adoption legislation. It is only legally possible to have legally reviewable ‘care arrangements’ until adulthood for vulnerable children separated from their own families for any number of reasons that could happen to anyone. The draconian adoption legislation cannot ever legally change the legal reality an adult who is adopted is legally entitled just like anyone else, to make our own decisions without needing to… justify that to anyone else including to the… satisfaction of politicians et al.
The legal reality is no-one will ever be able to change this… result:
The now British PM Johnson publicly claimed responsibility in 2008, while Mayor of London for sacking the top cop and now Lord Blair. In fact, the real agreement was Johnson would illegally continue to refuse to take personal, legal or political responsibility for his own unlawful actions, while the now Lord Blair would after a ‘suitable’ time, be elevated to the unelected House of Lords.
The British PM Johnson knew some 48 unlawful arrests and false imprisonments etc of me later, that either a civil or criminal jury would know I was specifically maliciously targeted, because I obviously did not suddenly become a criminal in Parliament Square, Central London.
I had already proved beyond reasonable doubt in Southwark Crown Court on 13th December 2007, without a jury, that Lord Blair had illegally edited CCTV that nevertheless shows me being attacked because politicians wanted to stop jury nullifications of legislation with compensation. Lord Blair et al were also found to have illegally destroyed independent video footage. The fact is Johnson as Mayor of London then also covered up my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 and further CCTV of his premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me.
The British PM Johnson knew while Mayor of London that the combination of the CCTV Lord Blair had illegally edited along with illegally destroying independent video footage, that had already been found to be illegal, that no amount of editing of the further CCTV footage of the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me could possibly hide from either a civil or criminal jury, I was a) politically targeted, in what escalated to b) the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me.
A jury would also know that in fact, Johnson and Lord Blair were (for example) working together.
I proved after I had supposedly been on bail and without returning to the UK, on 8th May 2013 (which was formally confirmed on 20th May 2013) with a criminal jury at Southwark Crown Court that Johnson was guilty beyond all reasonable doubt of the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me.
The legal reality is no-one can ever change the… result of a criminal jury on 8th May 2013 that was formally recognised on 20th May 2013 that continues after Johnson is no longer a PM, or politician. The fact Johnson only renounced his American citizenship to become British PM which meant he could also continue stalking me, means he is at the very least, legally obliged to resign from all politics and go to live in America.
I proved beyond all reasonable doubt and with a criminal jury the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me by Johnson also means Johnson had no legal grounds to… continue to refuse to hand over to… me the CCTV of the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me:
The reality is Johnson did continually maliciously targeted me, escalating to the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me to illegally stop jury nullification of legislation (the legislation by that time included the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 that was enacted to hide I also in reality won HQ11X00663 in January 2011 (before 4th May 2012) while Johnson and Westminster Council were using malicious lawsuits, to illegally try and avoid civil and criminal… juries. In fact when I filed legal papers in the High Court in the UK in April 2013 that Johnson et al had ‘no recognised defence in law’ for the endless ‘trespass’ on my person, Johnson was trying to at the same time continue to distract by falsely claiming I could not have a jury, in civil lawsuits, at the… same time I won with a… criminal jury too. The reality is Johnson knew even a civil jury would conclude that Johnson had committed criminal offences.
It is undeniable the State of Victoria had knowingly employed Sir Ken Jones, the former Head of ACPO in the UK as a DAC in Victoria and offered him Australian citizenship, all of which required … illegally covering up what happened to me.
I conclusively proved after Johnson had publicly lied by denying his multiplicity of malicious prosecutions against me were… political, that ’a politician’ would maliciously target an adopted person to cause prolonged and life threatening physical and emotional harm solely to further his own ‘political career’.
The legal reality was Johnson was legally obliged to at the very least resign completely from politics on 20th May 2013 because he no longer has the ability to claim he is innocent until proven guilty on either the balance of probabilities with a civil jury or beyond all reasonable doubt with a criminal jury.
The British PM Johnson spun a whole political spectacle about a referendum on the EU while I was living in my own home in Breizh, France, based on identity, while he was undeniably personally and politically… continuing to illegally try and ‘remove’ me, to further his own political career, in the full knowledge neither he nor anyone else, could ever legally change the… result of the criminal jury from 8th May 2013 that was formally recognised on 20th May 2013.
It is of course possible to change the result of the British referendum on the EU.
I am as an adopted person legally entitled to officially renounce draconian adoption legislation inside or outside any court of law:
It is self evident I was unlawfully arrested inside and outside a court in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia on 21st December 2021 because the… result of the criminal jury on 20th May 2013 can never be changed.
It is clearly not true that there is peaceful freedom of expression in Melbourne:
The communication from the AEC is so vague it does not meet the legal threshold of a witness statement. The public would probably be better served by the chartists annual elections for all politicians. It is a legal impossibility to change the… result of 20th May 2013.
The legal reality is my witness statement is not an optional extra that politicians have ever had any… choice to exclude because it does not suit their political self interest. The fact is it is… irrelevant that any politicians never cared what Johnson did or does because they are not an independent civil or criminal jury in a court of law, and they can never change the… result of 20th May 2013.
I am an adopted person and my witness statement is made on the public record in Australia, regardless of Johnson grandstanding as PM in the UK hiding the result no-one can change. I have already proved I did not need to leave my own home in Breizh, France and return to Australia in July 2019. It would be unworkable and ridiculous to claim I would ever need to… justify to the… satisfaction of the likes of Johnson officially using my own identity, or… officially renouncing draconian adoption legislation.
My pioneering two part compensation includes:
a) a person of any race, religion, politics or none who has been adopted having the choice to voluntarily and unconditionally receive the equivalent of $3000 Australian dollars per month, tax free that cannot be ‘means tested’ in any way, along with universal free healthcare of our choosing regardless of where we live or choose to live that also serves as a real universal basic income because people who are adopted come from all walks of life from all around the world and cannot be expected to keep ‘starting over’ in any circumstances.
(that would in my own case be paid by the State of Victoria)
b) exemplary and aggravated damages in individual cases that in my own case should be $1.4 billion tax free dollars (again paid by the State of Victoria)
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 