Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: I have… officially (& quite… specifically) renounced draconian ‘terms & conditions’ of adoption legislation, so Australian Ambassador in Paris (who knows about my case & that my own… home is in Breizh, France which is a ‘third country’) is legally obliged to issue a free Australian passport for me in my own identity & deliver it to Supreme Court in Melbourne, Australia for me to collect along with pioneering compensation from State of Victoria (26.01.2022)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I was born in Carlton, Melbourne, Australia.
I have as an adopted person… officially (and quite… specifically) renounced the draconian ‘terms and conditions’ of adoption legislation that are arbitrary, onerous, unreasonable, unworkable, and completely unnecessary and wholly disproportionate.
The peace and harmony of the rule of law is based on the most basic and fundamental principle of a… witness statement that cannot legally be refused, which is the same for everyone.
My… officially renouncing the draconian ‘terms and conditions’ of adoption legislation is not… contingent on any politician or their ‘career’, and politicians should never have used adoption legislation to further their own ‘careers’.
It is self evident, that the legal reality is Australian politicians (who cynically spin the vulgar political ‘one stop’ adoption ‘shop’… everywhere) could not by contrast, stop a law abiding private citizen who is adopted from… traveling overseas for the… specific purpose of… officially renouncing the draconian ‘terms and conditions’ of adoption legislation, while in another country. In fact people who are adopted do often legally live in a ‘third country’ for all sorts of reasons, that have nothing to do with adoption, just like people who are not adopted do.
My case (that on the face of it involves Australia and the UK so France is a ‘third country’) provides the legal basis for any person of any race, religion, politics or none who has been adopted, to voluntarily have pioneering compensation (incl. basic, and/ or aggravated and exemplary) that is essentially a genuinely universal income with free healthcare, regardless of where we live or choose to live, because adopted people do not need to and cannot continually ‘keep starting over’ to suit what are at most political whims. The idea that the draconian ‘terms and conditions’ of adoption legislation were ever about providing a stable… home is a complete myth.
I simply do not need to as an adopted person… justify renouncing the draconian ‘terms and conditions’ of adoption legislation to anyone else, including to the… satisfaction of complete strangers who are politicians, police and courts, because it is the peace and harmony of the rule of law that is the same for everyone. That was also the legal reality with the… political ban on peaceful freedom on expression in ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 etc while I was in Parliament Square, Central London.
It would be absolutely ridiculous to suggest that an adopted person effectively needs the ‘approval’ of a politician (because the legislation was invented by politicians to suit politicians) to… officially use our own identity.
The British and Australian politicians knew they could not legally arrest me in my own…home in Breizh, in a ‘third country’ France for… officially renouncing the draconian ‘terms and conditions’ of adoption legislation, or force me return to Australia (or the UK) and worse to unlawfully arrest me !! both inside and outside a court house in Melbourne (which is entrapment which is unlawful too) for… officially renouncing the draconian ‘terms and conditions’ of adoption legislation.
I did not sign this wide ranging ‘waiver’ for politicians, public officials et al (written on 14th September 2018)… after my adopted name was illegally leaked in the UK, for the trial by news media scrum:
The ‘adoption court orders’ that were made, could not possibly be legally valid. The politicians legislated for… courts to never even… inform people they are adopted, and it was intended for… court orders to be permanently… sealed by the courts, from access by the adopted person who is central to the case and most affected (which was the situation when I was forced to leave Australia as a teenager) so an adopted person is not even… served by a court, with basic court documents, despite the fact legislation claims courts can arbitrarily deprive any adopted person of their identity in part or whole, along with any nationality or citizenship so draconian adoption legislation can be used as the pretext to exile or extradite an entirely law abiding private citizen anywhere without any legal representation or due process. This all means that courts have never actually kept any, let alone agreed, accurate or contemporaneous court records including of any prolonged life threatening physical and emotional harm caused to an adopted person by draconian adoption legislation. The most an adopted person might belatedly get, from a DOJ or so called ‘Adoption Services’ (and not a court because an adopted person is never… served with anything from a court as either a child or adult) based on whatever the political whim of any day may be, is … photocopies of a jumble of alleged ‘records’ that do not even meet the threshold of basic disclosure etc. The… political spin that an adopted person would therefore need to fill out any… court forms (other than the legal ‘right of reply’ of a witness statement to… officially renounce the draconian ‘terms and conditions’ of adoption legislation is clearly perverse and ridiculous at most ‘stand over’ tactics. The completely arbitrary’ terms and conditions’ of politicians draconian adoption legislation are extremely reckless and arbitrarily punish an adopted person without law. The fact some people who have been adopted may not mind does not change the peace and harmony of the rule of law is for everyone, and that there are other means for people who have been adopted and do not mind, to make their own legal arrangements as adults, without draconian adoption legislation being imposed on those who reject it.
The 20th May 2013 etc:
(The politicians knew I had already proved I did not need to return to the UK while supposedly on bail in 2013 when I won a… criminal jury case, because politicians were only ever trying to illegally stop me having a… civil jury and jury nullification of legislation with compensation. That is why I already have what can only be a Universal High Court ’Habeas Corpus’… Court Order from the UK on 16th April 2008 (over Mothers Day 2006 etc) before the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me. The Australian politicians knew it was unlawful to force me to leave my own home in Briezh, France (while I was unwell because of what they were doing to me) and return to Australia in July 2019 that resulted in what they know is my unlawful arrests both inside and outside the County Court in Melbourne on 21st December 2021 because I … officially renounced the draconian ’terms and conditions’ of adoption legislation. In fact, politicians, police and courts ’’forgot’ to advise adopted people that there are no ‘court fees’ in the Supreme Court in Melbourne, for inextricably linked adoption and habeas corpus cases, because it is not unlawful for an adopted person to officially renounce the draconian ‘terms and conditions’ of adoption legislation, including with a jury and compensation. The politicians, police and court staff in the County Court in Melbourne knew it was unlawful to arrest me inside and outside any court, that could only result in a jury nullification in the Supreme Court in Melbourne with compensation. It is no different, including from what was going on in the UK. The fact I have… officially renounced the draconian ‘terms and conditions’ of adoption legislation does not change inside or outside any court and could only be referred by any other court, in Melbourne, to the Supreme Court in Melbourne, with a jury, where I cannot be charged any court fees. The politicians have just been… wasting the time of adopted people, including with buck passing between state and federal politicians and their supposed competencies in Australia despite the political parties being no different, because it is undeniable that politicians were only ever trying to illegally avoid… juries and compensation)
The fee exemption:
The legal reality is the Australian Ambassador in Paris is legally obliged to serve all Australian citizens regardless of state or federal… politicians et al, and the fact is I have… officially (and quite… specifically) renounced the draconian ‘terms and conditions’ of adoption legislation, and my own… home is in Breizh, France. So the Australian Ambassador in Paris is legally obliged to issue me with a free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat, that is delivered to the Supreme Court in Melbourne, Australia for me to collect, with my compensation from the State of Victoria. I don’t personally know of any… legal grounds that mean Australian citizens cannot more generally get an Australian passport from any Australian embassy, anyway.
(There were… successive Australian PM’s while I was in Parliament Square, Central London and in my own home in Briezh, France (Rudd, Gillard and Abbott) who continually politicized and compartmentalized adoption with… political language about ‘stolen generations’, ‘forced adoptions’ and a ‘one stop’ adoption ‘shop’ for their own ulterior motives. It is not a co-incidence I was illegally denied legal representation in the UK on 23rd June 2010 while Rudd switched from PM to FM in Australia to protect his insider trading with in Ingeus who are in business with British Tory and Labour political parties too. It turns out there were also hung parliaments in both the UK and then Australia that year)
If politicians were ever genuine about restoring public trust in politics etc, they would have already paid compensation, and responsibly focused on legally reviewable ‘care arrangements’ until adulthood for… all vulnerable children separated from their own families for any number of reasons, that could happen to anyone:
The Australian politicians do reasonably know they cannot legally stop an adopted person who is an Australian citizen renouncing the terms and conditions of adoption legislation, outside of Australia, without needing to be in, or to return to Australia, let alone to be arrested for renouncing the draconian ‘terms and conditions’ of adoption legislation in Australia.
This was so illegal:
There is only a ridiculous spectacle of politicians also repeatedly appointing… themselves as Ambassadors in for example the United Kingdom and United States (which is only another reason to advocate for the only chartist reform not implemented, of annual elections for all politicians who should only be able to stand for public office for a maximum number of years, regardless of whether that includes as a combination of councillor, state or federal MP, or State Premiers and a PM who should be directly elected by the public)
The reality any politicians can have access to information about adopted people despite a history of adoption court records perversely being permanently sealed from access by adopted people, has meant adopted people have never genuinely had any … privacy.
It is complete lie there is peaceful freedom of expression in a public space:
(In fact, politicians in Australia rely on the ridiculous spectacle of Australians and former Australians who are… not adopted, who are actors and part of the whole news media scrum, and also claim to be monarchists, who live in the United States (all for… financial reasons) to be… paid promoters in Australia complaining there is not enough adoption in Australia. These paid promoters of adoption who are… not adopted, publicly parade people who are adopted as the ‘latest must have accessory’ that actually breaches the privacy of… all adopted people, which they are only paid to do (along with being handed the usual baubles and bangles for their phoney ‘philanthropy’) to illegally try and stop… compensation for… adopted people.
The historical revisionism of an anything but impartial and completely… politicized child protection department of… ‘legal aid’ in NSW in Australia try and… circumvent legal realities like… compensation by publishing happy little novellas about the ’sunny uplands’ of a ‘utopia’ called adoption, where it is claimed that people are loved ‘if’ they are ‘lucky’ enough to be adopted. This is of course extremely misleading, and then some, because everyone should love… themselves regardless of… any challenging situations arbitrarily imposed on them… by others. In their mythical world of adoption which along with the closely related cult of scientology who also promote adoption (but at least you don’t get arrested etc for… officially renouncing scientology) is sold as ‘self improvement’ (while adoption is more like a very serious version of a forced ‘marriage of convenience’ of a minor to adult strangers by the state)
All people of any race, religion, politics or none are legally entitled to the equivalent of $3000 Australian dollars per month, basic compensation that is unconditional and cannot be means tested, along with completely free universal healthcare of our choosing, regardless of where we live, or choose to live. People are obviously also entitled in individual cases to additional aggravated and exemplary damages. In my own case that would be $1.4 billion dollars from the State of Victoria (that is the… vast sum of money, the shameless Rudd profited by with his ‘insider trading’ in politics with Johnson when he caused me life threatening physical and emotional harm that was intended to … permanently deprive me of any ability to… officially renounce the draconian ‘terms and conditions’ of adoption legislation, while Johnson et al (like Blair) sought to advance his own… political ‘career/s’. The simple reality is the fact I was… legally entitled to at the very least a …civil jury, stood in the way of Johnson et al’s… political career/s.)
I do reasonably expect to be able to get on with my own life.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 