Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: I was not legally obliged to leave my own… home in Breizh, France & return to Australia, to… officially renounce draconian adoption legislation & receive compensation (politicians et al know my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 2008 over Mothers Day 2006 etc guaranteed my legal right to provide a witness statement & have a… civil jury which is why I was not legally obliged while supposedly on bail, to return to UK in 2013 when I won… criminal jury case about politicians premeditated political torture & attempted murder etc of me) (19.01.2022)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I was born in Carlton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
I am not legally obliged to… justify to anyone else, including to the… satisfaction of complete strangers who are politicians, police and courts, my… officially renouncing draconian adoption legislation inside or outside any court of law.
The most fundamental legal principle of the peace and harmony of the rule of law, is a… witness statement, that cannot legally be refused. An adopted person who officially renounces draconian adoption legislation should in the absence of legal representation, have had at the very least, a ‘McKenzie friend’ with a legal right of audience, including in a court of law. The legal reality is politicians cannot claim a witness statement from an adopted person is an optional extra, politicians can simply dispense with whenever it happens to suit them. Nor should any adopted person ever need to collect multiple habeas corpus… court orders across numerous legal jurisdictions, including courts and countries.
The politicians never… intended for an adopted person to ever be able to officially renounce adoption or draconian adoption legislation which is why they never legislated for it to be mandatory for a court to even inform a person they are adopted, which would also involve courts actually… serving court records on the adopted person, which doesn’t happen. The draconian adoption legislation, that also includes politicians arbitrarily switching identities, residencies, nationalities and citizenships of adopted people without even informing the adopted person, means courts have not kept and maintained any accurate and contemporaneous court records about adoptions, regardless of any prolonged and life threatening physical and emotional harm caused to any adopted person by draconian adoption legislation. The draconian adoption legislation which does not genuinely provide an adopted person with any real… choices, created an anomalous and legally unsustainable situation of illegally preventing an adopted person from having the basic legal right that is the fundamental principle of the peace and harmony of the rule of law, to provide a witness statement in a court of law, that cannot legally be refused, including to officially renounce draconian adoption legislation, that in the absence of an adopted person being able to… freely do, politicians can use to further their own political careers, instead.
The British and Australian politicians only ever used my adopted identity to try and pass the buck between themselves over draconian adoption legislation. It has always been problematic that any politician can access personal information to know a person is adopted, so there has never really been any genuine privacy for people who are adopted.
The American born British PM Johnson who has (for example) had the unfair… political advantage of being able to illegally use anomalous and legally unsustainable draconian adoption legislation against me, has always undeniably illegally sought to… permanently… deprive me of my legal right to officially renounce draconian adoption legislation inside or outside any court of law. What is the self-entitled mediocrity and vulgar opportunism of someone like Johnson who obviously had… choices, I have never had, is that all he ever chose to do as a journalist and MP, Mayor of London, Foreign Minister, privy counsellor and PM was to abuse public office to punish me without law, to keep himself… out of prison. It was far easier for Johnson to eventually renounce his American citizenship than it is for me as an adopted person to renounce draconian adoption legislation. My legal… right to… officially renounce draconian adoption legislation is not in any way connected to or contingent on the ‘political career’ of the British PM Johnson, yet Johnson’s… political career that relied on draconian adoption legislation to punish me without law, has literally consisted of remaining a politician to stay out of jail himself.
I obviously do not as an adopted person… politically profit from… officially renouncing draconian adoption legislation, inside or outside any court of law, but Johnson who has always had an entourage of publicly funded political and legal ‘advisers’ did and does… politically profit including personally and financially from maliciously using anomalous and legally unsustainable draconian adoption legislation against me too. This has included while Johnson is and has been a journalist, MP, Mayor of London, Foreign Secretary, Privy Counsellor and PM.
It should never have become such a big… political deal for a law abiding private citizen who is an adopted person to… officially renounce draconian adoption legislation inside or outside any court of law. What should have mattered to politicians was providing legally reviewable ‘care arrangements’ until adulthood for all vulnerable children separated from their own families which could happen to anyone for any number of reasons, to improve outcomes for all.
It is entirely reasonable that I would want to peacefully move on with… my own life without unreasonable political ‘interference’ that has always included draconian adoption legislation being ‘normalised’ by a revolving doors of politics and the mostly male dominated news media scrum. The Westminster ‘system’ does not generally support independently minded law abiding private citizens, and particularly those who are women and mothers, who also happen to be adopted.
(I would personally always choose an independent jury, and advocate for the chartist reform of annual elections for politicians, so politics has an AGM like companies except that in democratic politics, the public are the biggest ‘shareholders’ before the soap opera of monarchy and a news media scrum. It is strongly arguable that an annual electoral democratic process for politicians with a maximum term of public office of possibly ten years regardless of the combination of any roles of politicians, as councillors, State or Federal MP’s or a PM, in for example Australia is more likely than not to result in more independent candidates who are interested in serving the public good with constructive reform for everyone in a more mature democracy, instead of politicians who are more interested in the pecking order of political parties and insider horse-trading between political parties/caste systems)
A jury would not consider it was merely ‘a co-incidence’ that I was illegally detained in hotel quarantine in Melbourne, Australia in August 2020 next door to Vitol Oil’s ‘Viva Energy’ (it was after all another privy counsellor, a Sir Alan Duncan who has always worked for Vitol, who could never explain to any jury why he would have wanted me illegally imprisoned without legal representation or trial on a non imprisonable alleged offence in 2008 to try and illegally stop jury nullification of draconian adoption legislation and the free speech ban in ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 over Mothers Day 2006 etc while I was in Parliament Square, Central London where I was unlawfully arrested etc… 48 times. It obviously wasn’t like I suddenly became a criminal, because I was in Parliament Square, Central London.)
(The facade of federal and state legislation in 1968 and 1986 in Australia did not legally settle the entire question of the anomalous British privy council that includes around 700 elected and unelected current and former mostly British politicians, along with members of the judiciary, and the monarchy that also means unelected and arguably superfluous governor generals and state governors in Australia are still imposed by Westminster. Johnson was still a dual national American and British citizen when he was Mayor of London, and then while also a Mayor of London, an MP again, before then becoming a Foreign Minister, which was when he originally became a privy counsellor, which was actually around the time he claims he renounced American citizenship, before later becoming PM. There are numerous unelected Lords of which there are around 800 + members are also publicly funded Ministers in governments, and thereby privy counsellors too. So the British House of Commons which has around 600+ members is something of a democratic facade in Westminster, given there are around 700 unelected privy counsellors including the monarchy and 800+ unelected Lords for a population of around 80 million people in the UK, although the still far from Commonwealth is much larger)
It is self evident I was unlawfully arrested in the County Courthouse in Melbourne, Australia on December 21st 2021 before then being unlawfully arrested again outside the County Courthouse on the same day, when I was also given an unlawful ‘direction’ that does not even name me or any legislation it relies on. This is because it is absolutely unlawful to stop me… officially renouncing draconian adoption legislation inside or outside any court of law, including with… a witness statement from me. That truth of my… officially renouncing draconian adoption legislation does not change, regardless of whatever court of law any politicians or police take me to. In fact it turns out that politicians, the police and County Court, had also ’forgotten’ to inform adopted people that there are fee exemptions for adoption and habeas corpus cases (which are mostly legally speaking pretty much the same) in the Supreme Court across the road. It is clearly… entrapment (which is absolutely unlawful) and disrespectful to… arrest an adopted person for… officially renouncing draconian adoption legislation, inside or outside any court of law !!
The ‘stand over’ tactics of the unlawful arrests of me both inside the County Courthouse in Melbourne, Australia (who rubber-stamped the original dirty deed of my adoption) and then outside on 21st December 2021 (when it could never even be said I voluntarily returned to Australia, let alone that court) does… conclusively prove there have never been any genuine… choices for an adopted person as either a child or adult (including because of course other legislation by politicians does claim children in Australia are legally responsible when they are ten years old)
The legal reality is an adopted person could not possibly lose any residencies, nationalities and citizenships because an adopted person chooses to no longer be adopted or there is no longer any draconian adoption legislation. People who are not adopted, who divorce (and draconian adoption legislation is a very serious version of a forced ‘marriage of convenience’ by the state of a minor to adult strangers) do not lose any nationalities or citizenships etc. It is clearly for a person who has been adopted and is no longer adopted, to choose what combination of nationalities and citizenships we might like to use (and where there is often claimed to be all sorts of overlap) that we were born with, or it is claimed we acquired through adoption, or in our own right as adults including while married, divorced or living in a ‘third’ country etc like I was when I was living in my own… home in France. There didn’t need to be a… political reason for me to simply like living in Breizh, France which is also in Europe and on the Mediterranean (putting to one side adoption legislation there too)
_________
The email (for example) dated 20th May 2013 (Johnson obviously knows about) about the seriously malicious prosecution brought by Johnson (as Mayor of London and boss of top cops) and Starmer (as DPP) that I won with a… criminal jury without needing to return to the UK :
The revolving doors of politics and the news media scrum obviously kept very quiet about the outcome of that… criminal jury case, because it didn’t fit their narrative.
____-
What is unreasonable, is for politicians to expect an adopted person to continually keep ‘starting over’ to suit politicians always changing draconian adoption legislation that is completely unnecessary and wholly disproportionate.
It is not legally possible for governments to impose ‘care arrangements’ during childhood that are forced to continue into adulthood, that could not possibly be proportionate or necessary, including without the agreement of the adopted person who is central to any case, and the person most affected. The legal reality is it is only possible to have legally reviewable ‘care arrangements’ until adulthood when we are legally entitled to make our… own decisions. I am Italian Australian, and it is completely perverse that my own parents who committed no civil or criminal wrong by having me, were nevertheless forced to give me up by different legislation that no longer exists in that form, they ‘aged out’ of including automatically but could not get me back, because I did not ever ‘age out’ of, including automatically, from draconian adoption legislation. So I was raised by a British citizen born in England in the UK, and an Australian citizen born in Queensland, Australia who married in Hong Kong, and lived in Australia, including before I was sent away from Australia as a teenager because I am adopted. That also means I was raised separately from my little sister with the same parents, who ‘suddenly’ died not so long after I found her, and not so long before she was going to come and live with me in the UK. I have two beautiful adult sons, who were born and live in the UK and New Zealand who are Australian citizens ‘by descent’ (because they have never lived in Australia for the obvious reasons) while I was also married in New Zealand to a New Zealander and divorced in the UK. The inter-generational trauma, also caused across multiple borders and countries, by draconian adoption legislation, is very real.
I have personally taken any and all reasonable steps regarding any conceivable pre-action protocol that is not disputed. It cannot legally be that draconian adoption legislation takes precedence over the right of people who have been adopted to make our own choices and decisions as adults, that highlights there is in fact and law, no genuine need for draconian adoption legislation for children either.
My pioneering two part compensation includes:
a) a person of any race, religion, politics or none who has been adopted having the choice to voluntarily and unconditionally receive the equivalent of $3000 Australian dollars per month, tax free that cannot be ‘means tested’ in any way, along with universal free healthcare of our choosing regardless of where we live or choose to live that also serves as a real universal basic income because people who are adopted come from all walks of life from all around the world and cannot be expected to keep ‘starting over’ in any circumstances.
(that would in my own case be paid by the State of Victoria)
b) exemplary and aggravated damages in individual cases that in my own case should be $1.4 billion tax free dollars (again paid by the State of Victoria)
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 