Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: My Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006 etc that provided jury nullification of Spanish Inquisition of draconian adoption legislation (that constitutes… unlawful arrest… false imprisonment &… trespass on person that… violates social boundaries politicians have no medical exemption to circumvent) provides legal basis for people of any race, religion, politics or none who have been adopted to freely choose to ’officially’ use our own identity & voluntarily receive pioneering unconditional free universal healthcare & financial compensation regardless of where we live & choose to live (09.01.2022)
1. My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
2. The facts are the not so ‘immaculate concept’ of completely unnecessary and wholly disproportionate adoption legislation does constitute an… unlawful arrest… false imprisonment, and… trespass on an adopted person in… violation of all social boundaries that all happens without due process or legal representation.
The politicians, and the Supreme Court in Melbourne, Victoria Australia (where I have spoken in person with court staff twice) are legally obliged to immediately explain (and provide legal grounds) if they do not think my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’… Court Order I do… already have (that has always involved Australian politicians too) is not just as equally valid in the Supreme Court in Melbourne, Australia too.
3. An adopted person is not legally obliged to… justify, to anyone else, including to the… satisfaction of complete strangers who are politicians, police or courts, renouncing adoption and draconian and authoritarian adoption legislation.
4. The legal reality is an adopted person does not commit any civil or criminal wrong simply by… renouncing the Spanish Inquisition of adoption and draconian and authoritarian adoption legislation, that cannot be refused by politicians, police and courts, who never had any… discretion or medical exemption to cynically…. reverse the ‘onus of proof’ to enact, impose, and enforce adoption legislation, including through the use of unconscionable… duress and regardless of any prolonged life threatening physical and emotional harm caused to any adopted person.
The cynical reversal of the ‘onus of proof’ for political gain, is a seriously unprofessional and a particularly nasty thing to do.
5. The… principle of justice means an adopted person only needed to ‘notify’ a public official, at most, with a written signed and dated witness statement, that the adopted person… renounces adoption and adoption legislation, that cannot legally be refused by any politician, police or courts, regardless of any bureaucratic forms they may want to use.
The unproven ‘mainstream’ (Sir Francis) Galton ‘theory’ of ‘nature versus nurture’, ‘eugenics’ and ‘adoption studies’ are only red herrings used to distract from the unlawful use of state force.
A Pope is cynically treating adopted people who… renounce adoption and draconian adoption legislation as… criminals and… heretics:
It is possible Cathars advocated some celibacy to try and deflect unwanted sleaze coming from the Catholic clergy, who in turn probably promoted a facade of celibacy originating around the same time (that hasn’t ‘aged well’ with such widespread abuse of… minors) simply to try and compete with Cathars. There’s no real reason why a Pope can’t promote clergy having their own families, instead of continuing to spin adoption.
The Pope typically obviously just doesn’t want people who have been adopted to have compensation
6. It is well known politicians et al do not like law abiding private citizens having a) a jury at the best of times, and b) most certainly not to help… nullify legislation and c) in particular to help nullify… adoption legislation and agree compensation, all of which I did comprehensively, and well and truly prove I was always legally entitled to.
The politicians knew the facts and circumstances of my ‘highly unusual’ High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order… guarantees a jury.
The politicians, police and County Court in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, did know there are… fee exemptions for adoption, and habeas corpus cases in the Supreme Court in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (they did not inform adopted people about that I only found out about myself by happenstance after I went to the Supreme Court) and that I already have one High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order, that I do not need to… justify (& so why should I need another one ?) I do not personally understand how any court, including the Supreme Court could not accept I already have a High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from the UK.
The politicians have already had every reasonable opportunity to legally acknowledge any pre-action protocol and agree a peaceful out of court settlement that a judge cannot ignore, or determine instead themselves, and nor could an adopted person incur any financial costs against them from politicians. I have clearly taken all reasonable steps in extremely distressing circumstances.
(I would be curious to see a copy of politicians insurance cover related to arresting adopted people who renounce adoption and adoption legislation)
The… principle of justice means an adopted person only needed to ‘notify’ a public official, at most, with a written signed and dated witness statement, that the adopted person… renounces adoption and adoption legislation that cannot be refused.
7. It is more likely than not that no politicians would want to be the first to acknowledge the nullification of adoption legislation because politicians might think it could result in adopted people claiming political asylum there which… is not a reason to continue adoption (because law abiding private citizens who are adopted and renounce adoption and draconian and authoritarian adoption legislation are in practise excluded from claiming political asylum based on the false pretext of a dispute over the identity of the adopted person that doesn’t happen in divorce cases of people who are not adopted) That could be peacefully addressed by an adopted person choosing to claim an additional residency in the disputed Golan Heights even if that is not a primary residency. The fact people who are adopted come from all walks of life from all around the world can be a political benefit, that promotes peace like we did in Parliament Square, Central London.
8. My ‘case’ includes a long history of politicians knowing I have been entitled to a… jury and nullification of adoption legislation accompanied by substantial compensation. The only reasons politicians forced me to return from my own home in Breizh, France to Australia in July 2019 (after I was forced to leave Australia as a teenager and exiled from the UK as an adult) was because they knew I had a) established the legal basis for jury nullification of adoption legislation and b) that it is for an adopted person to… choose (including as part of compensation if necessary) what combination of residencies, nationalities and citizenships we use, that we were born with, acquired through adoption or our own marriage/s etc (any overlap is often not easily defined) including to live in a ‘third country’ like France in the EU (or indeed any country in the EU) because of course when people are divorced (including people who are not adopted) the issue of individual residencies, nationalities and citizenships do not change, and indeed are not legally relevant. The politicians would never have got a medical exemption to do anything they have done to me, including to stop me living in my own home in Breizh, France, or getting access to proper medical treatment for multiple autoimmune and related illnesses.
9. The draconian and authoritarian adoption legislation (which cynically reverses the ‘onus of proof’ like ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 etc did) is incompatible with the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy because it only continues to exist by… reversing the onus of proof to punish without law, entirely law abiding private citizens who are adopted and… renounce adoption and draconian adoption legislation.
Background:
10. My own ‘case’ (352) began when my parents who had committed no civil or criminal wrong by having me, were nevertheless forced to give me up by different legislation, they quickly ‘aged out of’ without needing to justify themselves to anyone else, while adoption legislation was with unseemly haste used… against me, and despite my parents asking for me back, when it was also originally claimed adopted people could not ‘age out’ from adoption at any age. Even when that purported to change for public consumption (despite the fact politicians never even ever made it mandatory for courts to inform people they are adopted) it is still claimed it is only possible to not be adopted if an adopted person can… justify that to the… satisfaction of the state. This all meant that I was also isolated from and raised separately to my little sister from the same parents who ’suddenly’ dies not so long after I found her, and not so long before she was due to come and live with me in the UK. I was sent away as a teenager from Australia, because I am adopted.
11. I am an Italian Australian, born in Carlton, Melbourne, Australia, (who was adopted in the State of Victoria by a British citizen born in England, and an Australian citizen born in Queensland who both married in Hong Kong) and I have lived overseas since I was a teenager, because I am adopted. My own two beautiful adults sons who are Australian citizens by descent (but have never lived in Australia for the obvious reasons) were born and live in the UK and New Zealand. (I was married to my ex-husband a New Zealander in New Zealand and divorced in England in the UK) and my own home is in Breizh, France, where I lived between July 2013-July 2019.
12. The British and Australian politicians always knew about my ‘highly unusual’ and what could only be my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 (over Mothers Day 2006 etc when I was unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned so my adopted identity could be illegally leaked with false information, to try and spin the ubiquitous ‘trial by news media’ scrum instead of my ‘right of reply’ with a jury and nullification of legislation) because my Habeas Corpus Court Order in 2008 (when I was illegally imprisoned without legal representation or trial on the basis of a an alleged… non imprisonable offence made by a… politician who worked for Vitol Oil) only still confirmed my legal right to an independent… jury. In fact I would also have been legally entitled to a… jury if I had broken out of prison too (you get a jury if you break out of prison in the UK) which I was perfectly entitled to do, and would have done if a reasonable opportunity had arisen.
13. A former British Minister, a Sir Alan Duncan, who works for Vitol Oil who have their offices in Victoria in Westminster in London (and are what is known as ‘a state within a state’ with an annual turnover of £270 billion based on political ‘insider trading’ and are in a joint venture with Aviva Energy including Abu Dhabi, in Victoria, Australia which has had over $100 million government subsidies in the past year) is never going to and could never explain to a… jury, why he illegally tried to cover up Mothers Day 2006 in April 2008 etc, which is quite different from having Newscorp Scotland Yard Murdoch publish his ‘diaries’ to keep trying to… whitewash his reputation. Murdoch and Duncan have a historical link through Marc Rich, and Duncan originally leveraged the Dame Shirley Porter ‘homes for votes’ scandal to buy a second home in Westminster on the cheap and give himself a safe Tory seat. Vitol was only fined a token sum by the United States in 2007 for profiting from sanctions in Iraq, because the sanctions themselves constituted collective punishment.
14. It was self evident that an always completely self serving grub who was a former British Minister for Vitol Sir Alan Duncan (who no doubt typically only resigned to be elevated to the House of Lords) does in common with Westminster more generally have complete and utter contempt for any… independently minded law abiding private citizens who are women and mothers who are adopted.
15. My High Court High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order did prove to be something of a blight on Duncan’s personal political ambitions, if not his wallet, because he personally collected a £160,000 bribe at the time, from Vitol, but was caught out lying about me in a paid ‘hit piece’ several months later in August 2008 in a Lord Rothermere’s Daily Mail who described me as Australian, while Australian politicians tried to claim I am British.
The undeniable facts are Sir Alan Duncan, did not ever defend peaceful freedom of expression for law abiding private citizens… in Parliament Square, Central London so he has never actually… supported law abiding private citizens. He had to lie and hide my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order just to stay a politician, which is hardly approaching professional.
The real ‘inside story’ in Westminster is obviously really about Parliament Square, Central London.
16. The latest British PM Johnson (who was the Mayor of London and boss of top cops, and a Telegraph journalist at the time) legged it to the High Court (with the agreement of the latest so called Leader of the Opposition Starmer (who was DPP) when I was unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned… before a ‘State Opening’ in 2010 to bring another politically motivated false and malicious prosecution against me before I was released to distract from politicians… knew it was independently recorded by ourselves (and separately from the widely disseminated spin circulated of context by the continuing ‘trial by news media’ scrum) that I had properly complained politicians et al “don’t have a court order” because of course they knew… I do. So I eventually also ‘won’ their series of satellite litigation that was originally based on a ‘highly unusual’ alleged trespass… by me, when the actual… trespass is and was against my person (and property) in HQ11X00563 on 4th May 2012 because no one would let me anywhere near a witness stand, let alone to freely speak, because I am not the one who is legally obliged to… justify anything, including politicians continuing refusal to hand over to me the CCTV of the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me.
17. I later ‘won’ a further politically motivated malicious prosecution brought against me by both the current PM Johnson and so called Leader of the Opposition Starmer (while they were Mayor of London and DPP etc and still continuing to hide my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 -and- the CCTV of the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me) at Southwark Crown Court with a criminal…. jury in May 2013 without even needing to return to the UK, while supposedly on ‘bail’.
These are but examples of why an adopted person really does not need to… justify renouncing adoption and adoption legislation to the satisfaction of any politicians.
18. There is an obvious legal problem when it is ‘politically inconvenient’ for politicians for there to be accurate and contemporaneous records kept of adoption.
19. There is no reasonable doubt, I did comprehensively, and well and truly, establish that I am a law abiding private citizen and it is and always was about politicians illegally stopping my legal right to (at the very least) a civil… jury, that was being ignored (because I was unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned… 48 times solely to illegally stop my having at the very least civil jury to help jury nullification of adoption legislation.
20. I was only forced to stop living in my own home in Breizh, France and return to Australia in July 2019 because politicians persist with the myth that an adopted person needs to justify themselves to the satisfaction of politicians, police and courts.
21. It is clear I was illegally imprisoned in hotel quarantine in Melbourne, Australia in August 2020, umm… next door to Vitol Oil’s Viva Energy because there was no legal oversight.
Another predatory Vitol ‘subsidiary’:
22. It is clear, the only reason I was perversely unlawfully arrested inside… the County Court in Melbourne on 21st December 2021 on an alleged ‘trespass’ (which would constitute clear… entrapment and only result in a counterclaim from me anyway) was solely to use ‘stand over’ tactics to distract from the fact of the real… trespass against my person using the unlawful arrest and false imprisonment of… adoption that… violates all social boundaries. I did point out to police how shameful it was to arrest a law abiding private citizen who is legally… renouncing adoption and adoption legislation and that it is a… jury who is independent and that the police know about jury …nullification. The police did not take me to a police station, let alone let me give a signed and dated witness statement, including with a lawyer present, about how we were already… inside a court, and the police did not take me to another court, that could not change the fact I am legally entitled to renounce adoption and adoption legislation in… any court. I was also illegally searched along with my property I had with me, despite the fact the police unlawfully arrested me… inside a court where they knew I had already gone through all the security so police were literally just treating a law abiding private citizen who is adopted as a criminal. The police further unlawfully arrested me when I was completely honest and said I would go across to the Supreme Court and complain what was going on the County Court, and so they imprisoned me in a police van and drove me outside of what they call the CBD where the Supreme Court is, and gave me an unlawful direction that does not name me or any legislation it relies on to unlawfully ban me from the CBD and thereby the rest of that day from the Supreme Court in what were the most appalling ’stand over’ tactics. I did reasonably well considering I understandably have PTSD, and police used ‘stand over’ tactics that included unlawful assault, surrounding me, and yelling in my face, at me, albeit they did cause a significant flare up of my autoimmune and related illnesses, with their illegally… enforcing adoption legislation using nothing but state violence and intimidation.
23. I obviously did not even voluntarily go to the County Court in Melbourne (where I had after all reasonably asked for a hearing for a permanent injunction against adoption legislation when I went to the County Court in July 2021, despite the fact they knew and politicians knew and… did not tell adopted people, there are fee exemptions in the Supreme Court which I only discovered by happenstance after I went to the Supreme Court) because I did not even voluntarily return to Australia because I should have been able to… renounce adoption and adoption legislation while still living in my own home in Breizh, France, and regardless of adoption legislation there too, because the free for all of the Hague Adoption Convention includes… 99+ countries.
24. In fact the behaviour of the police and the County Court (who are paid by the public to be… respectful, and no more or less) only confirmed to me why I am… renouncing adoption and draconian adoption legislation that denies law abiding private citizens who are adopted the same legal rights people who are not adopted have, that include the legal right to self determination that also includes claiming political asylum.
I am certain this blatant discrimination wasn’t legal:
No adopted person should ever be… arrested because they renounce adoption and adoption legislation.
No reasonable and rational or responsible person would ever want to be even be adopted if it meant being… arrested etc if you… renounce adoption and adoption legislation.
25. Politicians know it’s not like any or all adopted people would want to return to the court that did the dirty deed, of imposing adoption, which could not be unbiased anyway, and worse while politicians are failing in their legal ’duty of care’ to provide the correct and unbiased information when there haven’t even been accurate and contemporaneous records kept of adoption.
26. The reality is an adopted person does not need to first have the ‘approval’ of politicians, police and courts to ‘officially’ use our own identity and renounce adoption and draconian and authoritarian adoption legislation.
I am personally claiming:
a) the equivalent of $3000 Australian dollars tax free and non means tested per month regardless of where I live or choose to live along with unlimited free universal healthcare of my choosing paid for by the State of Victoria (that should be available to anyone who has been adopted, regardless of our race, religion, politics or none, and regardless of where we live or choose to live)
(there has never been an easily accessible legal process for adopted people and I should never have needed to leave my own home in Breizh, France to return to Australia to argue the cynical reversal of the ‘onus of proof’ whenever that might happen to be convenient to… politicians)
b) an additional sum of $1.4 billion dollars tax free compensation (exemplary and aggravated etc damages) from the State of Victoria for the long standing and foreseeable injustice in my own case
The State of Victoria would never have got a medical exemption to stop me living in my own home in Breizh, France, where I should have been able to renounce adoption and adoption legislation without being punished without law.
c) I choose what residencies, nationalities or citizenships to use that I was born with, acquired through adoption or marriage and divorce etc that means I could choose to live in a ’third’ country like in Breizh, France in the EU.
(There are Bugat’s living in so many enclaves in for example the French, Spanish, and Italian, Catalan, Occitan, Aranese, Ariege regions on both sides of the borders through the Pyrenees, and mountain regions elsewhere including Italy etc)
Alternatively, the State of Victoria who did not consider the consequences of the particular (dual) nationalities they knowingly imposed on me, or the manner in which that was done (and despite claiming citizenship is a federal competency) will have to pay for me to have a free Australian diplomatic passport, because it is not legal to punish me without law.
I would consider registering an additional residency in the disputed Golan Heights if that helped address what will continue to be serious legal issues regarding ‘non-refoulement’ in my own case etc.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 