Donna Bugat

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: My unlawful arrest etc by eight police officers… inside the County Court, Melbourne, Australia on 21st December 2021 for my ‘crime’ of legally trying to ‘resign’ from the… fraud of adoption & my ‘right of reply’ with Supreme Court injunction against Victoria police et al trying to illegally enforce adoption (21.12.2021)

Exhibit A: the front of an alleged ‘direction’ that does not actually name me:

1. I obviously did not voluntarily go to the County Court in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, because I am not voluntarily adopted or voluntarily in Australia.
   
2. I explained to County Court staff (who reasonably know) I:

a) was literally legally ‘resigning’ from the… fraud of adoption, which is the simplest way to explain/describe what I am in practice doing (that politicians and courts had no ‘discretion’ to impose in the first place. I am not in any way… legally obliged to go along with adoption legislation)

b) had properly supplied the court with my court order yesterday confirming the nullification of adoption legislation along with outlining compensation, that I had pointed out was in any legal sense an “out of court settlement” they did reasonably know politicians do not contest and have had every reasonable opportunity to contest with an independent jury (that I had further pointed out the court had no ‘discretion’ to contest themselves !! because that is not the role of a court who was instead only entitled to issue my own court order with the… court stamp. The court staff have not and did not identify “a form” that gives them any ‘discretion’ with regard to my own court order (that could only or would only be a form they would need to and are perfectly capable of filling in… themselves because I am not trying to say the court has any ‘discretion)

c) included confirmation adopted people acquire any additional citizenships in our own right, just like people who are not adopted do.

‘Exhibit A’ (reverse side) of an alleged ‘direction’ (that does not actually name me)

3. The court know very well that the over-riding purpose of a court is supposed to be about the substance of facts and evidence and a statement of truth, related to justice, not whether or not someone has filled in the changing goalposts of an obstacle course of administrative forms. It is the properly… notifying of what cannot be… refused that cannot be reversed into… applying for what can then be refused with the obstacle course of 101 manipulative… excuses.
   
4. I have clearly followed the due process of the peace and harmony of the rule of law, rather than what the County Court who are obviously not independent, are doing with the abuse of process that is the draconian fraud of adoption.
   
5. I am clearly correct because of what happened next, when the court staff who are not independent, which is precisely why there are independent… juries, did not act legally and respectfully towards a law abiding private citizen, let alone by even bothering to have the courtesy of inviting me into a private office, or with the supposed ‘SRL department’ they claim to have, and just because I am adopted.
   
6. The court staff faced with the peace and harmony of the rule of law from me,
   further seriously abused their public office to illegally not only call private security (of course a British based company started by Westminster) but the police to falsely and maliciously accuse me of being a criminal !! for no other reason than because I was trying to legally resign the… fraud of adoption. Their easiest ‘option’ was to falsely accuse me of being a criminal, to… distract from politicians and their own court and staff actually taking… responsibility for what they have done, with the fraud of adoption, instead of wasting… my time for the past two and a half years since July 2019.
   
7. So the County Court is legally obliged to secure and provide me with a copy of the CCTV between 11am and 12.30 pm on 21st December 2021 and the body worn cameras of the eight police officers.
   
8. I was then unlawfully arrested ummm… inside a court (I didn’t personally want to be in, in a country I don’t want to be in, because of how politicians and public officials just use adoption to abuse me) on the pretext police wanted to take me to a court when we were… already in a court. It is a somewhat surreal ‘concept’ to arrest someone inside a court to take them to court.
   
9. I am particularly ‘perplexed’ since we were already all in a court on 21st December 2021 where I had previously gone in July 2021, specifically to have a hearing for a permanent injunction against adoption legislation, which the court failed in their legal duty to provide in July 2021, they could just as easily have done there and then on the 21st December 2021 too, with the police present, so my permanent injunction could include stopping the police illegally enforcing adoption too, because that is after all, in practise what the police were illegally doing.

10. Two police officers unlawfully arrested me without properly cautioning me, or taking a witness statement which they had every opportunity to do, which is also an assault on me, because they had not legal grounds to physically grab me anyway. The police publicly gave a false impression I am a criminal which is how they spoke to me and about me, that was not remotely proportionate, legal, accountable or necessary in a democratic society, let alone so court staff and politicians can continue to try and avoid… responsibility for what they are doing with the… fraud of adoption. It wasn’t until.. after I had been unlawfully arrested and we were outside the court that police officers then bothered to say the blah did blah of I “was not obliged to say anything”. The police claimed I had committed ‘trespass’ in a private place regurgitating some politicians legislation. I pointed out I reasonably believe the court is a public place funded by the public that politicians had never paid for (and was owned by whom ?? that was churning out the fraud of adoption. I would obviously just bring a counterclaim over any alleged ‘trespass’ in a public place where I had gone on entirely lawful business.

11. I explained… when I could get a word in among the gaggle of what became eight police officers and a number of private security, ‘standing over’ me and all talking at me, at different times, as though I am not a human being, that the British monarchy and British Parliament had already wheeled out the old chestnut of ‘trespass’ in published ‘landmark’ cases with my name in Parliament Square, Central London, when we proved the similar abuse of process of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 was a legislative excess used to unlawfully arrest me 48 times for lawfully being in a public space, had to be… repealed, and nullified (that did after all involved the same Sir Ken Jones who was Head of ACPO in the UK before he was invited by the Victorian politicians in Australia, to become DAC)

I explained to police I think a central issue is the illegality of threatening adopted people over citizenships which they know would be illegal punishment without law, and affects our own families too) because they can’t treat adopted people differently from people who get divorced and so on and so forth. I said you don’t hear about people losing their citizenship because they resigned from anything. I said it is clear that adopted people acquire any additional citizenships … in our own right including when officially using our own identity, instead of our adopted identity. I said it is clear to me that is going on, because that is quite central to why the British government were illegally stopping jury lawsuits against them because it would be very clear to a jury that an adopted person could not be treated differently from someone who was not adopted, with regard to citizenships. I explained the compounding of the problem by courts also rubber-stamping switching… existing nationalities and citizenships too.

12. One police officer said he didn’t care about anyone but himself, which I said was irrelevant really, because that did not make him illegally enforcing adoption okay. His ‘world view’ was that people had to do whatever police told them to do which police were doing on behalf of politicians and their legislation. I just said if he personally… chose to believe absolutely everything any politician ever said or legislated that is his own business and not what most people think and is precisely why there are independent juries to help nullify legislative excesses, and obviously was not true because we had repealed the legislative abuse of process of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 in Parliament Square, Central London.
    
13. I pointed out the truly shocking reality was the police had unlawfully arrested a law abiding private citizen… because I am adopted and that was their easiest ‘option’ too, rather than courts and politicians taking… responsibility for what they have done.
    
14. The police then said (while I had understood I was still unlawfully arrested and waiting to be taken to a police station) they would arrest me if I went back into the court, so I said well, they had already unlawfully arrested me, so they would have to unlawfully arrest me again then, because I did not reasonably believe I had done anything wrong. So when I lawfully entered the court again, I then just held out my hands in front of me, and then they unlawfully arrested me again, because of course I wasn’t the one resisting anything, and all they were doing was illegally enforcing adoption and stopping me living in my own home in France. So I said if they want to… compound the harm of the fraud of adoption and stopping me living in my own home, by not only unlawfully arresting, but putting me through the ordeal of a police station too, then so be it, because I have in reality acted completely reasonably and am legally entitled to live in my own home using my own identity.

It’s really not… complicated and I should not be discriminated against because I am adopted.

I want to be living in my own home with my own identity, and not being abused by police !!

15. And I said I would also like a lawyer at the police station and to make a statement because it was to say the least, somewhat ‘circuitous’ to arrest me in a court to take me to a court to as far as I can see try and distract from the… fraud of adoption, because that is what I am legally trying to peacefully resolve.

16. The police then used the second unlawful arrest to then illegally search my person and bag I had with me (because they admitted they already had my details from court staff) so the only possible true purpose was they were just publicly still trying to portray me as a criminal. The police officers illegally asked me for ID, like a drivers licence. So I showed them my British and New Zealand drivers licenses that I had with me along with other documents like the title deeds to my property in France, because I was going to and in court and the court often repeat themselves when asking for information, they have… already been given, to just… waste my time. The police officers asked me why I didn’t have an Australian drivers licence (which frankly was none of their business) so I politely explained I was sent away from Australia as a teenager because I am adopted and for the…. umpteenth time !! I had already said I didn’t voluntarily return to Australia or want to live in Australia, because I was only being abused including now by police because I am adopted. So why on earth would I have an Australian drivers licence ?? and particularly in my adopted identity, when I don’t want to be adopted !! or collect any more ‘documents’ in my adopted identity because I quite reasonably want to use… my own identity. I said when they asked that it was the first time I had been (unlawfully) arrested by Victoria police which is true, and was ironically about me being bullied by the state, about the… fraud of adoption that is… harming me.

17. The police officers unlawfully arresting me because I am adopted for goodness sakes only further explains why I could not possibly want to be adopted along with so much abuse that goes with that. All the politicians in the colonial ‘half-way house’ called Australia ever do, is rely entirely on victim blaming.

The police officers could only have intended to cause me harassment, alarm and distress, which they obviously did do, that has inevitably caused a significant flare up of my multiple autoimmune and related illnesses and the physical pain that goes with that, associated with the endless… trauma of being adopted, as if life isn’t complicated enough for most people.

18. Anyway, for some reason the police officers then started pushing me without warning (??) before they then stood around in their little groups talking among themselves about whatever they were taking about while talking on their radios, and bossing me about over where I should stand, and at some point said they were not after all taking me to a police station. So I asked the police officers for the copies of whatever they were nevertheless… charging me with and taking me to court over so I could then immediately go over the road to the Supreme Court and challenge what they had been doing to me, that I found truly shocking. A police officer first said I would have to ask for that information (about what they were charging me with and taking me to court over) using FOI !! which I said I obviously did not reasonably believe was true, because they were legally obliged to tell me now what they were allegedly charging me with, so I could go just go across the road to the Supreme Court with that information.

19. The police officers then said they were also issuing me with a ‘direction’ to “leave and not re-enter the CBD on the 21st December 2021” or they would arrest me for the third time, which I said just showed they were illegally trying to enforce adoption by illegally stopping me going to court. They only mentioned a ‘direction’ to leave the CBD when I was completely honest and said I was going across the road to the Supreme Court to challenge what they had… already done.

I asked for the police officers verbal ‘direction’ in writing along with what legislation they relied on because a) I did not reasonably believe it was a lawful ‘direction’ and b) I was legally entitled to a written copy of it, which they refused so I said well then they would have to arrest me (for a third time) because there couldn’t be a valid direction for me to leave the CBD that certainly wasn’t being applied to anyone else. There wasn’t much due process going on, that’s for sure. So anyway, the police officers said they had (unlawfully) arrested for a third time, and then falsely imprisoned me in a police van, but did not take me to a police station, but instead drove me out of what police call the CBD. Then when the police stopped and dropped me off, they started talking at me again about the ‘direction’ to not enter the CBD again on that day, which I said they really would have to write down for me, for me to be able to try and understand a) what they meant by the CBD and b) for the mysterious verbal ’direction’ to have any pretence of validity, because they only did that when I told them I was going across the road from the County Court, to the Supreme Court. A police officer then wrote on a card what no reasonable person could possibly believe came anywhere close to meeting the threshold of a lawful ‘direction’. When I pointed out police really were only illegally trying to stop me from going to a court about adoption, one police officer said I could go to another court out of the CBD which I said was really not their call and… I should not be the one being further inconvenienced, and particularly since neither court (the County Court or Supreme Court) had provided a ‘banning order’ to the police preventing me from going to either court over my adoption that if they had given me, would have to have been challenged… in a court anyway.

20. It was the… politicians who started it all with the… fraud of adoption rubber-stamped by… courts, that most adopted people wouldn’t want to be in.

21. My obvious ‘right of reply’ to multiple unlawful arrests of me on one day, on 21st December 2021 is to go to the Supreme Court on Wednesday 22nd December 2021 for a permanent injunction against adoption legislation and now the Victorian police illegally enforcing adoption, because it is the fraud of adoption that is the problem for me.

The County Court and Victorian police are welcome to a) accompany me into the Supreme Court to provide their ‘version’ about illegally enforcing adoption or b) agree my now having a permanent injunction against adoption legislation including over it being illegally enforced by Victorian Police who have jumped on the state bandwagon too (along with the compensation that I properly previously advised the County Court about, which was all I needed to do)

Now I will just remember how administrative court staff at the County Court in Melbourne, Australia (the fraud of my adoption took place in the County Court) vindictively with all the messianic zealotry usually associated with true ‘Blair-ite believers’ in the UK (who I guess are not so different from Thatcher-ites when you think about it)… compounded the harm already caused by adoption by falsely accusing me of having done something else wrong !! that necessitated police (seriously ??) I don’t personally consider I exist to please court staff in the County Court who are paid by the public to serve the public in a professional way, and nothing more or less.

The only reason… I was at the County Court was because I had no… choice because of the abuse of process of adoption legislation.

A kinder evolution is possible.

This statement is true.

Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)