Donna Bugat -v- Premier Andrews, State of Victoria & Ors: Premier Andrews admits my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006 etc nullified draconian abuse of process of adoption legislation & provides legal basis for compensation incl. pioneering universal basic income & free healthcare for people of any race, religion, politics or none who have been adopted, regardless of where we live or choose to live (20.12.2021)
My Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006 etc
1. My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I was born in Carlton, Melbourne, Australia and am an Italian Australian dual national citizen who was adopted, and has also lived in the UK, New Zealand, and Breizh, France (where my own… home is) and I have two beautiful adult sons who live in the UK and New Zealand.
I am Westminster et al’s ‘dodgy dossier’ about the draconian abuse of process of adoption legislation that only continues because it is about protecting the reputation of politicians et al, including from jury lawsuits, and not adopted people.
There is no politician who is ‘more important’ than any law abiding private citizens.
2. I am not legally obliged to first pay money to any court or provide my own court order according to any ‘government prescribed’ format because it contains the necessary… substance that I have legally stated is true that public officials are legally obliged to assist me with, by providing a court stamped copy.
The Court Order made against me as a child was never ever even served on me, even as an adult (the first time I saw a… copy of it was when I was forced to return to Australia in July 2019, which is quite an irony when you compare that to the sheer volume of pay per page ‘bundles’ served on me in the UK )
3. Premier Andrews admits he has at all times known as an MP, Minister and Premier including when I was in Parliament Square, Central London, and when Sir Ken Jones from ACPO in the UK was made DAC in Victoria, Australia and offered Australian citizenship (where he could only have knowingly made a fraudulent application that failed to disclose the full facts about me as an Australian citizen and Mothers Day 2006 etc when the top brass in the UK were… already mired in corruption over that) that he has knowingly ‘misled’ adopted people about our true legal rights, and my Universal High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006 that nullified adoption legislation with my pioneering compensation, for his own personal, political and financial gain.
I have… always had the ‘right of reply’ in a civil court with a jury:
4. Premier Andrews admits I have always had ‘the right of reply’ to politicians et al’s malicious lies about me in the news media about the very serious issue of legal proceedings, in a court with a jury to nullify the draconian abuse of process of adoption legislation, that Jones sought to illegally stop too. An independent jury can help nullify legislative excesses too.
5. The reason that Sir Ken Jones publicly lied about being threatened in Australia which he has never, could never and would never… repeat before at the very least a civil jury in either Australia or the UK, was because he… already knew he was illegally stopping an Inspector Lyons from appearing before at the very least a civil jury in a court in the UK too, to try and explain what he was told to say… to me on Mothers Day 2006. Jones was obviously implicated in HQ11X00563 too.
There are no legal grounds to stop an adopted person ‘resigning’ from adoption and the ‘constraints’ illegally imposed by adoption legislation:
It is undeniable that I am the only reason Sir Ken Jones was ever in Victoria, Australia and that what became even more legally problematic for him personally was my surviving the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me, along with the CCTV of that. Jones was clearly personally and financially directly benefiting from prolonged life threatening physical and emotional harm being caused to me. It says everything about the abuse of process of adoption legislation being used to protect politicians ‘reputations’ and governments from lawsuits, instead of protecting law abiding private citizens who are adopted and have committed no civil or criminal wrong in being adopted. There really are no excuses to lie about a law abiding private citizen who is adopted to try and hide the nullification of adoption legislation.
This (which happened on Jones’ watch) should never happen to any law abiding private citizen because they are adopted:
It is in fact an adopted person who has the legal right to ‘resign’ from being adopted and nullify the constraints of adoption legislation, There is after all no legislation that stops a politician or a monarchy resigning, and they would not be further unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned etc simply for doing so.
6. The politicians could not legally compound the very serious harm already caused by the draconian abuse of process of adoption legislation by… also illegally denying me the right to a civil jury about another legislative abuse of process (ie: ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005) because that would also result in the jury nullification of adoption legislation too.
7. Premier Andrews admits he has always known he has ‘no recognised defence in law’ to even put before a jury to make me go through the further onerous ordeal of a contested civil jury trial over the draconian abuse of process of adoption legislation.
Premier Andrews admits it is the abuse of process of draconian adoption legislation that is the problem, and that Donna Bugat is completely blameless.
8. Premier Andrews also admits the nullification of adoption legislation also provides the legal certainty for adopted people that any additional nationalities and citizenships acquired by adopted people through adoption legislation are actually acquired in our own right including when we ‘officially’ use our own identity instead of our adopted identity. That is consistent with people who are not adopted and includes and protects our own families too.
9. Premier Andrews unreservedly apologises to Donna Bugat, that could only legally mean he also resigns, because he knows he could not be part of the administration of or oversee my pioneering universal compensation for the draconian abuse of process of adoption legislation that begins in the ‘state of origin’ of Victoria, Australia.
Premier Andrews is not ‘more important’ (how could he be ??) than any law abiding private citizens.
My contribution to Peace, Love & Justice for All (that no-one should ever expect to be arrested and imprisoned over):
10. Premier Andrews admits my Universal High Court Habeas Court Order from Mothers Day 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006 means:
a) the abuse of process of draconian adoption legislation is nullified (the State of Victoria already have in place alternative ‘care orders’ that last until 18 years of age that should always be legally reviewable to avoid any similar abuses of process to adoption legislation)
b) people who have been adopted do not need to first pay money to or have the approval of a court to ‘officially’ use our own identity, that all public officials are legally obliged to recognize and provide the necessary documentation over at no cost to the person who has been adopted
(a person who has been adopted only needs to notify a court, including by email, with a statement of truth, of the need for replacement documents ‘officially’ using our own, instead of adopted identity, that no public official can refuse or charge any fee for the person who has been adopted to have)
c) people from any race, religion, politics or none who have adopted are legally entitled to receive a pioneering unconditional universal basic income of the equivalent of $3000 Australian dollars per month, that is tax free and cannot be means tested, or made subject to any fees or fines, along with free healthcare of our choosing anywhere, that is all regardless of where we live or choose to live
d) it is for a person who has been adopted to choose what nationalities and citizenships we were born with, or acquired through adoption legislation, or in our own adult relationships and with our families, to use
e) the State of Victoria will also pay for me to have a free Australian diplomatic passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat, along with an ’ex-gratia’ payment of $1.4 billion tax free dollars incl. because of the compounded harm caused from my repeatedly being illegally stopped from ‘officially’ using my own identity, while also repeatedly being illegally stopped from living in my own home in (for example) Australia, the UK and in Breizh, France while also being caused prolonged life threatening physical and emotional harm, that has always been entirely avoidable.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 