Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: My Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006 etc nullified abuse of process of draconian adoption legislation & provides legal basis for pioneering compensation for people of any race, religion, politics or none who have been adopted, while political & news media scrum grandstand about ‘denationalization’, ‘revocation of dual nationality’ & ‘extradition’ legislation etc (17.12.2021)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I was born in Carlton, Melbourne, Australia, and am an Italian Australian, and dual national who has lived in the UK, New Zealand, and in the autonomous Breton Woods in Breizh, France (where my own home is) and I am the proud mum of two beautiful adult sons who live in the UK and New Zealand.
It was always a legal impossibility for a government to argue with my own original pink-sequinned banner that publicly stated “I am not the Serious Organized Criminal”.
The City of London’s ‘poster boy’ Lord Myners claims he was adopted in his ‘public profile’ that was invented after I was in Parliament Square, Central London, and he lied as Chair of Trustees of the Tate and a director of the Bank of England, about the ‘State Britain’ rip-off, while trading Rigis with the Victorian government in Australia, including the current ‘Premier’ who was posing as the ‘Health Minister’ at that time. Myners was also Chair of the Guardian Media Group who had never supported Brian and myself, and while he did also in August 2008 lie about me, while hiding my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006, that nullified adoption legislation. The British Establishment could just as easily have invented Lord Myners was adopted, because he had after all been a journalist with the Telegraph too, just like Johnson, who Myners supported while Chair of Edelman, etc etc.
The fact it is… possible for a government to lie about who is adopted (because it is governments who invent the adoption records in the first place, that is more easily disputed with DNA these days) to maliciously use someone a government may claim is adopted to…. target a law abiding private citizen who is adopted (just like they manufacture all sorts using Special Branch and the intelligence services etc) is just… another reason for the nullification of adoption legislation.
The CCTV of the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me was also illegally stashed in the City of London.
Lord Myners had been Chair of ’St Paul’s’ Cathedral in the City of London, who hosted ‘Occupy’ while the Palaces of Westminster were hiding… new legislation illegally used against me on 16th January 2012 in Parliament Square, Central London, while they also illegally ‘adjourned’ HQ11X00563 etc.
The global adoption industry with a multiplicity of hidden ‘acquisitions, mergers, take-overs and monopolies’ is treated as ’too big to fail’ because of compensation.
The political and news media scrum grandstand about denationalization and revocation of dual nationality, along with extradition legislation etc that hides my nullification of adoption legislation with compensation because global adoption legislation has… already always been routinely used for ‘denationalization’, ‘revocation of (existing and acquired) dual nationality and exile or ‘extradition’ etc, despite the fact a law abiding private citizen who is adopted, has not committed any civil or criminal wrong simply by being adopted.
In addition, the family members of Australian politicians do not lose for example their dual nationality, because a member of their family chooses since 4th April 2002 to make themselves subject to s 44 of the not so Australian Constitution on dual nationality in federal and not state politics, which is when dual nationality was first ‘officially’ recognized in Australia nationally, although dual nationality was in fact, previously recognized elsewhere. An adopted person does not usually lose a citizenship acquired through adoption, if one or both of the adopters change their citizenship, that does happen, so an adopted person who ‘officially’ uses our own identity, instead of our adopted identity, has in fact, actually… acquired any additional citizenship/s through adoption, in our own right. A person who acquires a citizenship through a person they later divorce does not usually lose that citizenship, including if they originally got that citizenship through an adopted person who later ‘officially’ uses our own identity and other citizenship/s instead. People acquire nationalities and citizenship/s in their own right, all the time, through all manner of relationships, while adoption legislation has never adapted or progressed to acknowledge the real lives of adopted people including to… freely ‘officially’ use our own identity.
The Premier of Victoria who it transpires was more interested in shuffling around Rigis, for goodness sakes !! with the City of London & Tate et al (I, and my little sister who sadly passed away, both liked the Frederick McCubbin triptych, although I have seen similar paintings I like more by lesser known artists, and the Prado in Madrid is my own favorite gallery) has obviously had every opportunity to contest my ‘out of court settlement’ that starts with the State of Victoria, in a court with a jury, so the County Court/Supreme Court in Melbourne, Australia cannot say that he contests anything, including legally. There is no legally required written ‘format’ for my ‘out of court settlement’ that the County Court/Supreme Court in Melbourne, Australia, only has the legal authority to issue with a court stamp, not argue about. The County Court/Supreme Court in Melbourne, Australia have had every opportunity to agree any wording with me, and they also have the legal duty to file my ‘out of court settlement’ in Geneva, because of course my own home is in Breizh, France.
_____________
My Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 that nullified the abuse of process of draconian adoption legislation with pioneering compensation, means people who have been adopted do have real… choices:
a) people who are adults who have been adopted do of course have the choice to continue using their adopted identity
b) people who have been adopted can alternatively genuinely… choose to ‘officially’ use our own identity instead of our adopted identity without first paying money to and having the approval of a court, along with the voluntary and unconditional receipt of pioneering universal basic income with the equivalent of $3000 Australian dollars per month that is tax free and not means tested, and cannot be made subject to any fees or fines, along with free healthcare of our choosing anywhere, that is all regardless of where the person who has been adopted lives or chooses to live. The person who is adopted also has our own choice of residencies, nationalities, citizenships, that we were born with, acquired through adoption, or as adults in our own relationships including with our own families, to use, that are all treated as having been acquired in our own right, and cannot be taken away from us by any government, that also helps protect our own families too. People who are adopted can have family members from multiple generations, all around the world, some of whom, they may not even know, so it can be very difficult for an adopted person to reunite with the many dimensions of family life, across generations, most people can take for granted.
The fact people who have been adopted do come from all walks of life from all around the world, does mean that a universal basic income and healthcare for people who have been adopted that also serves as compensation, is a pioneering use of the concept compared to a variety of national programs.
It is the sensible way to phase out adoption legislation.
c) I am in addition legally entitled to a free Australian diplomatic passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat and $1.4 billion tax free dollars. I am not legally obliged to put my own trust in politicians.
__________________
I reasonably expect to be able to collect a stamped court copy of my ‘out of court settlement’ from either the County Court or Supreme Court, in Melbourne, Australia, on Monday 20th December 2021, because I am legally entitled to peacefully move on with my own life, free from the constraints imposed by the abuse of process of draconian adoption legislation.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 