Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: I could have been living in Jerusalem if politicians et al were not living in state of denial, because a jury would agree adoption legislation was nullified on Mothers Day 2006, before fmr Australian Labour PM Rudd & British PM Johnson et al began making corrupt payments between themselves to also illegally hide my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 & cctv of premeditated political torture & attempted murder of me etc, so I remain legally entitled to collect $1.4 billion tax free dollars compensation from administrative office in County Court in Melbourne, Australia (08.11.2021)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The draconian nonsense of adoption legislation is a complete abuse of process by politicians etc.
It is not healthy for the state to try and force a law abiding private citizen who is adopted to lie about our own identity, including forever.
The legal reality is adoption legislation cannot continue, and a jury would agree adoption legislation was really nullified on Mothers Day 2006.
The typical token adopted politician who goes along with adoption legislation, because otherwise they are excluded from politics, at best, just does not want to face reality themselves, because part of the healing and moving on, is acknowledging it is adoption legislation that is an abuse of process. It may not have been possible to do anything about the abuse of process of adoption legislation as a child, that it is possible to correct as an adult. The politicians who pretend that adopted people need to pay money to and have the approval of a court to have our own identity are obviously literally lying, because they don’t need to do that themselves, when they are not adopted !!
My own life is not whole without my own identity including my Mediterranean identity that was completely erased by adoption legislation, because that is who I am, and not any old identity the state arbitrarily imposed on me that was intended to be forever.
I am not legally obliged to trust politicians.
The most ridiculous and patronizing adoption court orders made behind closed doors in secret show trials in courts, cannot legally force me to lie about my own identity, and adoption legislation could not legally be used to illegally withhold court records I was as the adopted person the court records are supposed to be about…. always legally entitled to, just like I have always been legally entitled to correct the information in adoption court records, because accuracy was not one of the purposes of adoption legislation.
There are no legal grounds for adoption legislation.
I could have been living in Jerusalem where I visited in 1984 when I was staying on the Yad Mordecai kibbutz, if there had not been adoption legislation, that also erased my Mediterranean identity..
The continuing corruption involving the British PM Johnson involves the former Australian Labour PM Rudd (who is still collecting the taxpayer dime in Australia) and the British Tories, and is, because i am adopted, subject to legal proceedings involving a jury in Australia too. (There is obviously no formal ‘corruption commissioner’ that covers politicians in both Britain and Australia)
I am not personally related to any Paterson, and this is not my own identity, (it is the adopted identity) but there were quite a few political scandals while I was in Westminster:
The British and Australian politicians unlawfully arrested me in Parliament Square, Central London, and illegally leaked my adopted name to the press on Mothers Day 2006 using ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 (which we proved in courts was illegal) because they knew that not only that legislation, but also adoption legislation would be nullified by a High Court civil jury, so they were illegally trying to stop a High Court civil jury trial.
This was about politicians et al illegally trying to stop a High Court jury nullification of not only ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005, but adoption legislation too:
The adoption legislation is designed to try and avoid… jury lawsuits, but a jury and nullification became inevitable with the abuse of process of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation too.
A civil jury is sometimes the best a law abiding private citizen can do, if the state will not bring a criminal prosecution or when the state can take over and deliberately lose a private criminal prosecution.
(There are of course serious legal problems with the anomalous London Mayoralty and Assembly that encourage corrupt practices while working with the British Parliament, along with the unelected House of Lords which is routinely used to elevate corrupt politicians and their cronies)
The reason the journalist called Andrew Gilligan slithered along in 2007 in the run up to the Mayoral election in 2008, was to try and distract from our legal right to a High Court civil jury to nullify legislation, while trying to hide there was no difference between Livingstone & Johnson who would and did both illegally use ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005, along with hiding the violent attack by an unknown male assailant who violently punched me in the head, and my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008. Mr Gilligan did not offer up the identity of the male who violently attacked me, they were all covering up, that he knew meant Livingstone faced a High Court jury trial over that too. A Victorian Liberal MP called Mr Tim Smith who illegally covered up my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 claims he was working as a ‘researcher’ for the British Tory MP David Davis, who was working with Livingstone too, before a Mr Smith also worked with another former Australian PM called Turnbull. A Liberal Australian Senator called Mr J McGrath was working with Johnson when they both covered up my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 etc etc.
It is self evident that Johnson only agreed to be London Mayor on the basis he could continue collecting the Daily Telegraph cheque for $225,000 per annum along with the publicly funded Mayoralty salary of £140,000. So, in reality Johnson first and foremost worked for the Daily Telegraph who would not have continued to pay him unless he used the London Mayoralty to maliciously target Brian and myself. One of Johnson’s Daily Telegraph editors while he was Mayor of London, was Gilligan who is a paid adviser to him now (who has also worked for Rotheremere, Murdoch and Press TV etc) in the revolving doors of politics and robber media barons in Westminster. Johnson who also paid Lynton Crosby had an extraordinarily large number of ‘advisers’ in his entourage while he was Mayor of London.
The former Australian PM Rudd
The politician most legally responsible in Australia for illegally covering up my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006, along with the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me, when I properly asked for the CCTV from a criminal division of the Magistrates Court before it inexplicably ended up instead in the possession of politicians who refused to hand it over, is however, the former Australian Labour PM Rudd.
There is no doubt the political torture and attempted murder of me was premeditated and went ahead with the knowledge and agreement of the former Australian Labour PM Rudd, after the Australian government had already offered Australian citizenship and the role of DAC in Victoria to the former Head of ACPO in the UK, called Sir Ken Jones.
The former Australian PM Rudd only resigned as PM after I was illegally stopped from giving evidence in court in the UK on 21st June 2010 before illegally being denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010, which was completely his fault. Then while he stayed on as Foreign Minister he undeniably illegally collected the brazenly corrupt payment of $1.4 billion dollars from the British Tories, laundered through Ingeus while !!!! there were multiple very public lawsuits involving him, including HQ11X00563 involving numerous British politicians like Johnson, Westminster Council, the Home Secretary and the PM Cameron etc. It is undeniable it would have been a legal impossibility for Rudd to have secured the corrupt payment that was laundered through Ingeus, without illegally covering up my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 and the premeditated torture and attempted murder of me.
When the new legislation against me in the UK, first illegally used on 16th January 2012 failed then Rudd took time out on the sidelines as a backbencher, and drafted in a corrupt former Premier of NSW, a Mr Carr, to grandstand as Foreign Minister, until I was exiled from the UK in 2013, and lived in my own home in Breizh in France, at which point Rudd briefly became PM again. The grandstanding about forced adoptions by Gillard et al was completely political because the legal reality is a jury would agree adoption legislation was really nullified on Mothers Day 2006.
My case does highlight why there cannot be adoption legislation.
The only reason I didn’t apply (for example) for a French passport, including in my own identity was because of adoption legislation, and I was only forced to return to Australia in July 2019 because of adoption legislation, when by no co-incidence Johnson became the British PM and his lawyer Starmer who was previously the DPP and ‘human rights’ adviser to ACPO, became a so called Leader of the Opposition (who also used the same political advisers as Livingstone)
The former Australian Labour PM Rudd still, and illegally in his own case, collects the tax payer dime in Australia for an office too !!
My personal observation is it is much easier for politicians to be involved in orchestrating corrupt payments, for themselves, when like with Ingeus, what should really be services provided by civil servants, are transferred to private companies in what is known as poverty profiteering etc.
I am nevertheless the same adopted person whether I am in Australia or the UK, and politicians never had the option of ‘voluntarily disclosing’ and recording whatever they wanted, about the prolonged life threatening physical and emotional harm adoption legislation causes me. The Australian government are in serious breach of non-refoulement in my own case, and in particular because of Rudd, that could only be remedied by nullifying adoption legislation, that can then be recorded on my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 too. The facts of my adoption do include multiple countries.
I am legally entitled to be able to collect $1.4 billion dollars tax free compensation from the administrative office in the County Court in Melbourne, without further legally unjustifiable political delay.
In the true facts and circumstances, adoption legislation was nullified on Mothers Day 2006.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 