Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: My Universal County Court Order in Melbourne that nullifies abuse of process of adoption legislation that in part or whole erases identity & indefinitely suspends Habeas Corpus & jury trials etc means I am legally entitled to make my own decisions about self determination, so court is legally obliged to record my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 26th March 2006 etc & premeditated political torture & attempted murder of me & that I am legally entitled to collect free Australian diplomatic passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat that also means my sons are free to make their own peaceful decisions too, along with $1.4 billion dollars tax free compensation from administrative office without further legally unjustifiable political delay (31.10.2021)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I am a law abiding private citizen so the legally unsustainable abuse of process of adoption legislation started to completely unravel when numerous published records show I was while also adopted, a peacenik in Parliament Square, Central London between 2005 and 2013 when I opposed war, during the revolving doors of political administrations.
The reason politicians had illegally leaked my adopted name to their press on Mothers Day 26th March 2006 along with what we proved in courts was false information using ss 132-138 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 that was also an abuse of process about peaceful freedom of expression etc etc, is because the abuse of process of adoption legislation indefinitely suspends Habeas Corpus and jury trials etc.
I was exiled and lived in my own home in Breizh, France including during the British referendum on the EU. It was however, the continuing abuse of process of adoption legislation that forced me in July 2019 to return to Australia, where I had been sent away from as a teenager, before I was inevitably illegally detained in hotel quarantine without any legal scrutiny of any kind, in Melbourne in August 2020 during a global pandemic.
I was raised by the highest echelons of the British and Australian intelligence services who posed as my parents and godparents. I was married in New Zealand where one of my sons was born, and divorced in the UK where my other son was born, and both my sons are also Australian citizens although they have never lived in Australia, while my own Mediterranean identity was completely erased through the abuse of process of adoption legislation.
My little sister I was raised separately from, who had the same parents ‘suddenly’ died in Australia, shortly before she was coming to live with me in the UK. That was around the same time the two twin sons of my adopted brother also ’suddenly’ died after one twin was executed in what became a ‘high profile’ court case about the shooting in Australia, before the other twin died in a car accident, while I was living in the UK. The Australian government also say a friend’s little sister who was recruited by the intelligence services committed suicide when she resigned. My best friend Brian who was English, died in hospital in Bremen, Germany after he was effectively exiled from the UK while I was in Parliament Square, Central London. My boyfriend Neil, from Wales, who had lived in Germany for many years before he campaigned with me in Parliament Square, Central London, and lived with me in Breizh, France, was forced to claim political asylum in the Netherlands last year, after the ECHR were notified the German government tried to repossess his oxygen machine etc, after we had all been violently attacked and injured while in Parliament Square, Central London. While I was illegally detained in hotel quarantine in Melbourne, in Australia, last year, Neil was taken from a hospital in Enschede in the Netherlands by ambulance to the Ter Apel refugee centre in the Netherlands, who could not look after him while his claim for political asylum was looked into, so he died shortly afterwards, stateless in hospital in Emmen in the Netherlands. It was the abuse of process of adoption legislation that meant that it was not possible for me to make a claim for political asylum, despite the facts of what happened in Parliament Square, Central London, alone, apart from my being adopted, would otherwise have meant I qualified for political asylum on the grounds of political persecution etc.
The true legal reality is politicians et al are legally obliged to acknowledge the legal right of adopted people to make our own decisions about self determination, as indeed our own children should be able to do too, that would also mean courts do not face widespread legal cases about the abuse of process of adoption legislation.
It is only legally possible to have legally reviewable care arrangements until adulthood for vulnerable children separated from our own families for any number of reasons that could happen to anyone, that do not provide any legal grounds to in part or whole erase our own identities, and indefinitely suspend our own self determination, Habeas Corpus and jury trials etc etc.
My Universal County Court Order in Melbourne, that nullifies the abuse of process of adoption legislation, means I am legally entitled to make my own decisions about my self- determination that means the County Court in Melbourne is legally obliged to record my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 about Mothers Day 26th March 2006 etc and the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me, along with my legal right to collect a free Australian diplomatic passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat, that also means my sons are free to make their own peaceful decisions too, along with $1.4 billion dollars tax free compensation from the administrative office in the County Court in Melbourne, without further legally unjustifiable political delay, because I am a law abiding private citizen who is obviously not legally obliged to put my own trust in politicians et al.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
__________
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: I know my own identity is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression, self determination & justice, that naturally nullifies abuse of process of adoption legislation where I know adoption court records I first saw in July 2019 had been illegally withheld including while I was in Parliament Square, Central London (refer Smith & Rudd) that also stopped me applying for French passport, before political propaganda of forced adoption that is not a legal or medical term was invented that no politician or judge could, would or is ever going to rely on or repeat in a court (03.11.2021)
I know the adoption court records that I only saw for the first time after I was forced to return to Australia in July 2019, had been illegally withheld from me, including while I was in Parliament Square, Central London.
There is obviously no doubt whatsoever I was illegally prevented from putting all sorts of information before even a High Court jury.
I obviously could not apply for (for example) a French passport when I was living in my own home in Breizh, France, before and during the British referendum about the EU because of the legal problems with and caused by the abuse of process of adoption… legislation. I am also not comfortable with being forced by the state to lie about my own identity. I didn’t even have the adoption court records that had illegally been withheld from me that I only first saw when I was forced to return to Australia in July 2019.
There is no legitimate reason for the abuse of process of adoption legislation that is not not a political issue that can only be changed by a political vote. The abuse of process of adoption legislation goes far beyond mere harassment by the state.
I don’t personally see any political difference between the likes of a Victorian Liberal MP Mr Tim Smith who claims he was a “researcher” for the British Tory MP David Davis who worked with Labour’s Livingstone, when he illegally covered up the life threatening violent attack on me when I was punched in the head (a doctor did refer me to an eye specialist who identified a problem with my left eye etc etc) and the former Australian Labour PM Rudd who collected a corrupt payment of $1.4 billion dollars for covering up the torture and attempted murder of me, which is why he has never said a word against the British PM Johnson. The British Tory MP David Davis who I did not know, was creepy towards me, when he slithered up to me at a public event in Westminster, to make offensive comments which I just attributed to him being drunk and envious of what Brian what doing.
The legal reality is both the Victorian Liberal MP Tim Smith and the former Australian Labour PM Rudd illegally covered up the life threatening violent attack on me in 2007, and my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 etc.
The low standards of journalism that are mirrored in politics are epitomised by Murdoch’s Sun newspaper being regarded in Westminster as both a credible and government accredited source of information along with the British PM Johnson who was paid as both a journalist and Mayor of London etc to routinely lie. The Australian politicians in the Liberal and Labour parties who you never hear criticize Johnson are all part of Johnson’s far from Commonwealth glee club.
I am not legally obliged to trust politicians.
The politicians hide behind their relatively recently invented propaganda of forced adoption (originally agreed between a Federal Labour and State Liberal political parties of that time) that is not a legal or medical term any politician or judge could, would or is ever going to rely on or repeat in the County Court in Melbourne.
I think I am more interested in justice:
The Adoption Service in the DOJ know they are obviously legally obliged to provide written confirmation to the County Court, they will stop trying to illegally fob adopted people off with the political language of forced adoption that is not a legal or medical term, that just continues to use and abuse adopted people as political pawns.
The legal reality of my peacefully nullifying the abuse of process of adoption legislation means adopted people in the State of Victoria will have the freedom of expression to have our own identity and legal right like anyone else to self permission without the deeply offensive and disrespectful abuse of process of adoption legislation that falsely claims adopted people need to pay money to and have the permission of politicians and courts et alto have our own identities. The nullifying of the abuse of process of adoption legislation will also have the benefit of achieving justice without protracted or widespread court cases, and despite the fact some adopted people may choose to keep adopted identities.
Most adopted people would naturally just be happy to be able to genuinely make our own decisions about our own peaceful freedom of expression and the legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The legal right to the peaceful freedom of expression and self determination of our own identity is about justice, not political power.
There is no politician or judge who can legally deny my own identity is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression, self determination and justice that naturally nullifies abuse of process of adoption legislation.
My own County Court Order in Melbourne (that includes an order for public officials to provide any documents they think are necessary) for my free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat (to their own relevant government departments, so it can be issued without further inconvenience to me) and $1.4 billion dollars tax free compensation that I am legally entitled to collect from the administrative office in the County Court in Melbourne without further legally unjustifiable political delay, so I can return to my own home in Breizh, France too, legally nullifies the abuse of process of adoption legislation.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
_____
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: I am illegally forced by the state to lie about my own identity, while I only first saw my adoption court records after being forced to return to Australia in July 2019 that had excluded my own parents from any court hearing, that had also been illegally withheld from me including in Parliament Square, Central London & France (refer Rudd, Abbott & Turnbull et al) so I also could not apply for French passport including in my own identity & while I was in France (that would have proved problematic for French government et al adoption legislation too) when I was also charged money for alternative to sixth schedule adoption birth certificate (04.11.2021)
I am not okay with being forced by the state to lie about my own identity.
The abuse of process of adoption legislation is deliberately arbitrary, inconsistent and discriminatory which is reflected in adopted people never being properly informed of our legal rights including to our own identity and self determination.
It is similar to the abuse of process of politicians seriously libelous and defamatory ss 132-138 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 about the political ban on free speech, we proved illegally sought to reverse and replace the peace and harmony of the rule of law with the political facade of ‘permissions’ that were not necessary for a law abiding private citizen to have. The only intention of the abuse of process of that legislation was to try and provide political cover for state violence.
The Australian politicians had first tried to deny I am an Australian citizen, before Lord Rothermere (who claims to be resident in France) used his Daily Mail to try and make my being an Australian an issue in 2008, outside any court proceedings, in seriously libelous comments that were intended to illegally distract from my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008. The politicians ‘interpretation’ of what constitutes journalism is obviously based solely on their own personal and financial self interest. The revolving doors of Westminster do after all think and speak about law abiding private citizens as ‘vermin’ and ‘blood sport’.
Murdoch’s Lord Marlesford (a Times Director) & the Westminster “We all….”
The only reason adoption legislation falsely claims an adopted person needs to pay money to and have the permission of politicians and a court to have our own identity, which is forcing adopted people to at best act under duress is to try and avoid lawsuits through in practise what amount to secret show trials. There are no legal grounds for any politician or court to stop any adopted person officially using our own identity.
The politicians then sought to further mislead and use and abuse adopted people as political pawns, with their political language of forced adoptions that is not a legal or medical term any politician or court could use or rely on in any court. There is no politician or court who could legitimately claim an adopted person needs to pay money and have the permission of politicians and courts to officially use our own identity.
There are no legal grounds for an adopted person to not always have had possession of our own adoption court records that are specifically about us, that adoption legislation never intended for us to ever have despite it being our legal right in all circumstances.
The reality is that contrary to political misinformation in the public domain the people who pose/d as our parents did at the very least always have the court records with sufficient information that identified an adopted person and our own family members, regardless of the additional abuses of process that identified an adopted person to any public official through the use of sixth schedule birth certificates, even where an adopted person did not know that and did not disclose the adoption. There was never any genuine privacy for an adopted person.
I was personally misled into thinking what was called hospital records that I was also falsely told I needed the permission of the government to have, were the only records used in and by a court, which I did think was odd and didn’t make legal sense but it was all an abuse of process anyway, so any information an adopted person gets is based on whatever suits political administrations.
The only records I had seen prior to being forced to return to Australia in July 2019 were what are referred to as hospital records. When I first went to the DOJ when I was forced to return to Australia in July 2019, they said they would get back to me in several weeks and when they didn’t I went there again and they handed over what they refer to as court records, and said I had to come back for additional records they call hospital records before they then lied about my not attending an appointment, because adoption legislation is an abuse of process so they are only providing political cover for politicians anyway.
I remember my whole life and the never ending lies about adoption flashed before me when the DOJ was wittering on about what they call court records that are not accurate anyway, because they were originally intended to be illegally withheld forever, that had remained true in my own case, because the abuse of process of adoption legislation leaves it open for law abiding private citizens to be used as political pawns. The only reason the DOJ handed over what they call court records when I was forced to return to Australia in July 2019 is because they did reasonably know they were running political cover for politicians where the courts were and are already involved.
The DOJ in Melbourne, do reasonably know I was after all illegally prevented from putting all the information before even a High Court civil jury in the UK, and stopped from applying for a French passport including in my own identity because an adopted person who wants to officially use our own identity is discriminated against and punished without law.
The British government had stolen and destroyed information including my sixth schedule birth certificate which I had to pay money to replace while I was in France, that the Victorian government replaced with a birth certificate that is not sixth schedule and does not identify me as adopted that is dated 29th April 2015. I had only needed an Australian passport to get a new Australian passport given to me by the Australian High Commission in London in February 2013, and I didn’t need a birth certificate to buy my house in France, where the notary just took documentary evidence related to my being legally entitled to live in France without restrictions after also living in the UK too, all before the political free for all of the British referendum about the EU. The politicians never had any regard for my own legal rights or those of my own family.
I am discriminated against as an adopted person if I want to officially use my own identity, yet the person who posed as my mother, let her own British citizenship lapse and took up Australian citizenship without bothering to tell me or my sons, after I discovered my own identity, while my ex-husband originally had the right to live in the UK through my adoption that didn’t change when we were divorced.
I don’t see the former Australian Labour PM Rudd who took a corrupt payment for $1.4 billion dollars from the British Tories to keep on trying to rip off people with the also discredited zero hour contracts etc or the Liberal PM’s Abbott (and his vulgar and opportunistic ’One Stop Adoption Shop’) and Turnbull, all of whom have never supported my peaceful freedom of expression, while they spun the nuclear yarn in 2015 when I was in France (despite it being public knowledge French and Chinese governments are involved in Hinkley Point in the UK where the public are paying to maintain military nuclear capability) on trial over the abuse of process of adoption legislation they use/d against me.
The politicians are similarly probably the least likely to care about any global warming caused by industrialization, because they are personally already the least likely to be affected and always legislate to protect themselves and their cronies first more generally anyway. They also know that logically, the more private citizens can personally invest in affordable clean renewable energy, the greater personal autonomy people can choose to have from politicians.
I was obviously legally entitled to (for example) apply for a French passport (I had similarly been legally entitled to a New Zealand passport in my own right rather than through my marriage) in my own identity of Donna Bugat that would have needed me to have my adoption court records, but that would have proved problematic for the French government adoption legislation too !! which would have been a similar issue in the EU etc.
It is completely unacceptable that I was threatened by a male on New Years Eve in 2019 who refused to identify himself and said my adoption case would never go to any court, that in practice perpetuates the absence of Habeas Corpus in the abuse of process of adoption legislation.
My own home is actually in Breizh, France, and that would never have been a big deal except for the abuse of process of adoption legislation it is a legal impossibility for me to comply with that there is no legal obligation for me to comply with anyway.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
___________
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: This properly notifies Premier & County Court in Melbourne it is absolutely unlawful for politicians & courts to in any circumstances force me as a law abiding private citizen, to lie about my own identity & family, that means politicians arrogant, disproportionate, disrespectful, offensive, patronizing & ridiculously stupid adoption legislation (that like free speech ban hidden in ss 132-138 of the Serious Organized Crime & Police Act 2005) is completely & utterly unnecessary & so politicians do really owe me $1.4 billion dollars tax free compensation (05.11.2021)
“I am not the Serious Organized Criminal”
The politicians… intended to physically and emotionally harm and insult entirely law abiding private citizens with their free speech ban hidden away in ss 132-138 of the Serious Organized Crime & Police Act 2005.
“A kinder evolution is possible”
The same goes with politicians arrogant, disproportionate, disrespectful, offensive, patronizing and ridiculously stupid adoption legislation that is equally completely unnecessary.
It beggars belief that the deceit of adoption legislation means that politicians and courts did not as a starting point ensure that the adopted person who the adoption court proceedings are after all, all about… always had a court record of the court proceedings brought against them, along with the opportunity to correct false and misleading information contained in court records.
The DOJ is about anything but justice with regard to adoption legislation.
It is a legal impossibility to legally legislate to try and force a law abiding private citizen to lie.
It is well known that trying to force someone to lie, does of itself adversely affect that person’s physical and emotional health.
The seriously corrupt former Australian Labour PM Rudd never criticises the current British Tory PM Johnson, because of the corrupt payment of $1.4 billion dollars from the British Tories. They both exemplify, along with Blair & Howard et al, everything that is wrong with adoption legislation that is wholly political.
I am the same law abiding private citizen, whether it is or was ss 132-138 of the Serious Organized Crime & Police Act 2005, or adoption legislation.
The very straightforward legal reality is it is absolutely unlawful for politicians and courts to in any circumstances try and force me to lie about my own identity and family, so politicians do actually really owe me $1.4 billion dollars tax free compensation.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 