Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: My Universal Court Order that politicians & judges have no legal standing to oppose, nullifies political propaganda of adoption legislation as an abuse of process that poses an unacceptable public health risk, so I am legally entitled to free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat along with $1.4 billion dollars tax free compensation while everyone argues about taxes in Old City in Jerusalem (26.10.2021)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I am an ordinary law abiding private citizen who is adopted and was correct when I attended the County Court in Melbourne in person in July 2021 (after I was stopped from living in my own home in France, and forced to return to Australia in July 2019 because of adoption legislation) and properly requested from the administrative court staff a court hearing for a permanent injunction against adoption legislation, even if I had to pay the costs of the hearing on that day for a permanent injunction up front, before inevitably claiming the costs back of what politicians and judges know they cannot contest.
A patronizing and significantly misleading report published on 8th September 2021 in Victoria by politicians who don’t even pass the sniff test of appearing to be responsible adults, does not even acknowledge the legal reality that adoption legislation is an ongoing… global multi-billion dollar industry, while it dishonestly claims politicians who have no legal standing to enact… adoption legislation, in the first place !! have six months to respond to their own bogus report on an inquiry published on 8th September 2021. Their bogus inquiry was obviously only about politicians continuing to illegally hide behind publicly funded free legal representation for themselves.
(It is undeniable I am maliciously targeted by British and Australian politicians etc, because of the illegal attempts to stop related jury lawsuits against politicians about peaceful freedom of expression in ss 132-138 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 in the UK when my adopted name was illegally leaked by politicians to the press along with false information, while I was in Parliament Square, Central London between 2005 -2013 because politicians did reasonably know those unprecedented jury lawsuits would have resulted in jury nullification of adoption legislation too. It was the fact those jury lawsuits involving my Habeas Corpus High Court Order from 16th April 2008 would have resulted in the jury nullification of adoption legislation that led to the political torture and attempted murder of me.
** It cannot legally be that an adopted person who does not consent to the political propaganda of adoption legislation can illegally be stopped from at the very least a civil jury trial in satellite litigation because that would also result in the jury nullification of adoption legislation **
It’s obviously always been illegal for politicians to try and impose conditions on basic disclosure of their criminal wrongdoing involving the political torture and attempted murder of me (it is legally unclear how the CCTV I properly requested from the criminal division of a Magistrates Court came to be in the possession of politicians who have always then refused to hand over any original or copies)
It is obviously not a co-incidence the British Tories co-opted a now Victorian Liberal MP called Dr Matt Bach who is adopted, and… politicises adoption, to help them, like Murdoch’s mouthpiece Gove in the UK who is also adopted, in their not entirely successful election result in the UK in 2010, of a hung parliament, (just like the Liberal Senator McGrath helped in the 2008 London Mayoral election before the Victoria Labour party appointed Sir Ken Jones from ACPO as DAC in Victoria etc etc) all while I was in Parliament Square, Central London, and it is well documented politicians and robber media barons were publicly attacking me. The Dr Bach more recently took over in Australia from another duplicitous Liberal MP called Wooldridge who was part of Labour’s grandstanding with another former Labour Australian PM called Gillard with the political language of ‘forced adoptions’ that is not a legal term, so the former Australian Labour PM Rudd could collect his corrupt payment of $1.4 billion dollars from the British Tories laundered through Ingeus etc etc
It is obviously undeniable the former Australian Labour PM Rudd would never have been able to even collect the corrupt payment of the $1.4 billion dollars unless he had illegally covered up my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 and the political torture and attempted murder of me etc etc.
The British politician Gove and the Australian politician Bach (who claim to be adopted) are fully aware their only role in their political parties is to be the ’token’ adopted people, for politicians et al trying to… perpetuate the political abuse of process of adoption legislation on others.
It is fair to say they have never supported law abiding private citizens peaceful freedom of expression anywhere, because politicians know they are illegally covering up my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order in the UK from 16th April 2008 and the political torture and attempted murder of me because… I do not consent to adoption legislation)
Of course it’s self evident the only reason there is adoption legislation is politicians and their many hundreds of thousands of public officials would prefer to first spend taxes on… themselves rather than the responsible provision of legally reviewable care arrangements until adulthood for vulnerable children separated from their own families for any number of reasons that could happen to anyone. The only political argument is about the provision of money from taxes for legally reviewable care arrangements that could provide full time nannies for every child and the very best in specialized boarding schools, instead of imprisoning children in the mediocrity of residential care or the phoney ‘forever families’ of adoption.
There wouldn’t be many intelligence services who haven’t exploited adoption legislation that included the people from the highest echelons of the British and Australian intelligence services who posed as my parents and godparents:
The politicians and courts are failing to empower an adopted person who refuses to consent to the abuse of process of adoption legislation that at best consists of legally irrelevant personal opinions.
The available administrative court staff were legally obliged to facilitate that court hearing on that day because I am legally entitled to to be able to peacefully move on with my own life, instead of being unnecessarily inconvenienced any further.
The politicians et al know they cannot legally arrest, prosecute, imprison, torture and attempt to murder etc me or deny me my timely choice of healthcare and stop me living in my own home, including during a global pandemic, and illegally interfere in my absolute legal right to sue the state/s country for the nullification of adoption legislation because it is an abuse of process. Not forgetting I was also illegally detained in hotel quarantine in Melbourne in August 2020 that was a political responsibility free zone with zero legal oversight of any kind
The true legal position is the abuse of process of the political propaganda of adoption legislation is nullified by my own Universal Court Order because no politician or judge can legally argue they have any relevance or legal standing, to argue anything other than how taxes are spent, on what could only legally be, legally reviewable care arrangements until adulthood for vulnerable children separated from their own families for any number of reasons, that could happen to anyone.
The politicians and courts do reasonably know they have no legal standing to oppose my nullification of adoption legislation.
I obviously have no intention whatsoever of asking anyone else’s permission to be Jewish, and live in the only Jewish State on the Mediterranean and in the world.
I am legally entitled with my Universal Court Order that nullifies adoption legislation, to a free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat and $1.4 billion dollars tax free compensation, while everyone argues about taxes in the Old City in Jerusalem.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 