Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: My Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 & political torture & attempted murder etc of me happened because adoption legislation etc are legally unworkable, so I am legally entitled to collect from administrative office in County Court in Melbourne, a free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat & $1 billion dollars tax free compensation, without further legally unjustifiable political delay, while everyone argues over taxes in Old City in Jerusalem (17.10.2021)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and my legal right just like anyone else, to self determination.
I naturally, unlike politicians et al did not concede ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation was legally workable.
(In the UK, on 30th March 2011, politicians were in Parliament, and while still illegally hiding my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 and the political torture and attempted murder etc of me, trying to illegally hide behind Hansard while illegally debating various malicious ‘satellite litigation’ of theirs against me, along with the failure of their legally unworkable legislation, including right outside in Parliament Square, Central London, they also admitted they wanted to illegally cover up elsewhere)
I am a law abiding private citizen and it would be a legal impossibility for politicians to claim they speak on behalf of or instead of me in my case, they cannot legally contest in court, or enact any legislation against.
The legal reality is adoption legislation (and the British Australian Constitution Act 9th July 1900) etc are legally unworkable, so I am personally legally entitled to be able to collect from the administrative office of the County Court in Melbourne, in an out of court settlement, a free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat, and $1 billon dollars tax free compensation without further legally unjustifiable political delay.
I have accrued any additional rights, including nationalities and citizenships in my own right and identity of Donna Bugat, that I may choose to use if I wish, because it is adoption legislation etc that is legally unworkable.
(I guess it is strongly arguable, given my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 etc, it would presumably be sensible for politicians to hold another referendum, including Australian citizens living inside and outside Australia, about a democratic republic of Australia, sooner rather than later)
Most people agree there should be easily accessible and affordable universal healthcare available to everyone at all times.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
____________
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: State Premier is obviously illegally hiding former Labour Australian PM Rudd has already illegally… failed to declare corrupt $1.4 billion dollar payment from British Tories completely… relies/d on illegally covering up my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 (over Mothers Day 2006 etc) & political torture & attempted murder etc of me, before Rudd tried to become UN Secretary General proves politicians do illegally use adoption legislation for personal political & financial profiteering, so I am legally entitled to free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat & $1 billion dollars tax free compensation without further legally unjustifiable political delay (18.10.2021)
My identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right, just like anyone else, to self determination.
(The political adoption legislation which does not make any legal or moral sense, does serve as cheap propaganda for politicians who are trying to avoid legally reviewable care arrangements until adulthood for all vulnerable children separated from their own families until adulthood, which could happen to anyone for any number of reasons.
The British politicians obviously did not do what they did to me without getting the nod from the former Australian PM Rudd.
It’s legally undeniable that former Australian Labour PM’s Rudd has already illegally… failed to disclose the only reason Ingeus got a $1.4 billion dollar contract from the British Tories is because he was directly involved, including in illegally covering up my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 and the torture and attempted murder etc of me. It is legally straightforward there could not possibly have been a $1.4 billon brown envelope passed his way without his direct involvement in the cover up over my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 and the torture and attempted murder etc of me.
(The revolving doors of Labour’s Blair resigning on 27th June 2007 before Tory Johnson became Mayor of London in May 2008 because he agreed to illegally cover up my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008, involving Livingstone et al, that led to the political torture and attempted murder of me, which the former Labour Australian PM Rudd was very clearly a part of. So after I was illegally stopped from giving evidence in the High Court on 21st June 2010 before illegally being denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010, Rudd then resigns as PM in Australia for public consumption, but stays on as Foreign Secretary so Gillard can run interference grandstanding about ‘forced adoptions’ while Rudd illegally collects the corrupt $1.4 billion payment from the British Tories through Ingeus while there was HQ11X00563 !! before Rudd returns as Australian PM on 27th June 2013 after I was exiled from the UK etc, and then tries to become UN Secretary General, before Johnson & his ‘human rights’ lawyer Starmer (ie: ACPO & DPP & DAC Jones in Victoria & the Australian Robertson at Doughty Chambers) began posing as the British PM and Leader of the so called Opposition etc etc after I was then forced to leave my own home in France on 28th June 2019 can obviously be attributed to the illegal political use of adoption legislation by politicians solely for their own personal financial profit.
The State Premier is obviously illegally covering up the former Labour Australian PM Rudd was given a corrupt $1.4 billion payment from the British Tories through Ingeus that completely relies/d on covering up my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ High Court Order from 16th April 2008 (over Mothers Day 2006) & political torture and attempted murder of me that proves politicians do illegally use adoption legislation for personal and political financial profit)
When the State of Victoria can longer use adoption legislation, which is legally and morally entirely unnecessary, unworkable and unjustifiable anyway, that would personally mean the same as my having a diplomatic passport. It would also politically mean politicians would in at least the State of Victoria begin to have to make genuine efforts with legally reviewable care arrangements until adulthood for vulnerable children separated from their own families for any reason which could happen to anyone.
I am obviously legally entitled to collect from the administrative office in the County Court in Melbourne, a free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat along with $1 billion dollars tax free compensation, without further legally unjustifiable political delay.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
__________
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: State Premier who finds time to check in & register to stand in publicly funded politics, while illegally delaying my collecting free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat & $1 billion dollars tax free compensation would soon change his tune, if he was banned from politics for illegally failing to ban legally unworkable adoption legislation that has no logical connection to health & well-being or multiculturalism (19.10.2021)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else, to self determination.
The State Premier et al undeniably illegally profit from their unsustainable state of denial about entirely unnecessary and legally unworkable indefinite adoption legislation that has no logical connection to health and well-being or multiculturalism.
There isn’t a politician including the State Premier who could stand up or has stood up in any court including before a jury and in a timely manner (which is different from grandstanding with misleading and manipulative excuses before chosen media or parliament for public consumption) to try and claim they can hide behind adoption legislation (the whole point of which is about the state not making or keeping any proper records !!) to say there is a problem with my own identity.
The State Premier manages however to find the time to check in and register to stand in publicly funded politics. If he was banned from publicly funded politics because he illegally refuses to ban legally unjustifiable adoption legislation, he’d soon change his tune.
The reasonable and proportionate alternative to adoption legislation of legally reviewable care arrangements until adulthood for vulnerable children separated from their own families which can happen for any number of reasons to anyone, has the immediately obvious benefit of helping to limit the opportunities for improper political et al involvement that has included no proper record keeping.
It is, in fact, the State Premier (the numerous political ‘cut & paste’ versions of legally unworkable adoption legislation vary between states and countries) illegally delaying my free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat along with $1 billion dollars tax free compensation from the administrative office in the County Court in Melbourne without further legally unjustifiable political delay.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
___________________
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: I am a law abiding private citizen legally entitled to free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat, with my birthplace instead listed as Jerusalem so I don’t need anyone else’s permission to be Jewish & Mediterranean, with $1 billion dollars tax free compensation in final status out of court settlement with unlimited freedom of movement to help restore true family connections, because legally unworkable adoption legislation has no logical connection to health & well-being or multiculturalism (20.10.2021)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression, and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The whole point of legally unworkable no questions asked political adoption legislation is the state/country does not make or keep any proper records of any kind.
I am a law abiding private citizen, therefore legally entitled to a no questions asked free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat, with my birthplace instead listed as Jerusalem so I don’t need anyone else’s permission to be Jewish and Mediterranean, with $1 billion dollars tax free compensation in a final status out of court settlement with unlimited freedom of movement to help restore true family connections because legally unworkable adoption legislation has no logical connection to health and well-being or multiculturalism.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
_________
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: A politician knows an adopted person who rejects adoption that most affects them is most likely to legally challenge unworkable legislation, so it is perverse politicians include additional unreasonable legislation to try & prevent an adopted person bringing legitimate legal challenge in courts, just like politicians didn’t illegally imprison me on a non-imprisonable alleged offence, in an open prison in the UK when I nevertheless got my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order because I would have just walked out of an open prison to have a… jury (you can be imprisoned including illegally without a jury, but you get a jury if you break out of prison) because it is only politicians who cannot explain their own actions (20.10.2021)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The politicians and courts have not provided me with any basic disclosure or defence in law, including in a timely manner, regarding the cheap and unsustainable propaganda of adoption legislation that lies about a person’s true identity, including indefinitely without any logical connection to health and well-being or multiculturalism.
The absence of this basic disclosure and recognized defense in law from politicians using adoption legislation means politicians cannot legally rely on or use adoption legislation.
I am confident that I would have in any event been able to successfully argue my case before a jury. A law abiding private citizen who peacefully and entirely naturally rejects adoption legislation (which is obviously something a person who is not adopted ever has to think about or do as either a child or adult) should not face any or so many unreasonable obstacles arbitrarily imposed by a state or country.
The fact a politician knows it is an adopted person who naturally rejects adoption legislation that has no logical connection to health and well-being or multiculturalism, is most likely to legally challenge legally unworkable adoption legislation in court that affects them most is not a legal reason to put in place as many additional obstacles as possible to try and prevent a legal challenge in a court. It is just like politicians in the UK didn’t illegally imprison me on a non-imprisonable alleged ‘offence’ in an open prison when I nevertheless got my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order because I would have just walked out of an open prison to get a jury (you can be imprisoned including illegally without a jury, but you get a jury if you break out of prison) because it is only politicians who cannot explain their own actions.
It is a well established fact it is not legally necessary to have any permission from either politicians or courts to peacefully challenge in courts, including with a jury, legislation that is entirely unnecessary and legally unworkable. The politicians adoption legislation is not an exception in a world where most law abiding private citizens do not agree with all politicians and public officials all the time.
It is not unheard of for politicians to enact onerous legislation that is legally unworkable but the cheap propaganda about adoption legislation that is unsustainable is serious, because the lies about a person’s true identity, including indefinitely, and at the whim of someone other than the person most directly affected completely contradicts so much of the peace and harmony of the rule of law.
I have personally faced the cumulative adverse effects of at least two connected legally unworkable pieces of legislation including and combined with adoption legislation in the UK etc, and my own parents faced the cumulative adverse effects of at least two connected legally unworkable pieces of legislation including adoption legislation in Australia, before they were then able to keep my little sister, who passed away. The continuing adverse and inter-generational consequences of adoption legislation have … already been devastating in my own case, including the fact two sisters with the same parents were raised completely separately. My little sister with the same mother and father always knew about me, while even the fact I had a little sister with the same mother and father was kept secret from me by the state, for absolutely no legitimate or lawful reason.
The legally unworkable adoption legislation is all about politicians et al, not vulnerable children, because of course there should be legally reviewable care arrangements for all vulnerable children until adulthood separated from their own families for any number of reasons that could happen to anyone, including because there are unscrupulous politicians who will try to exploit vulnerable children. The revolving doors of politicians do not care their incredibly onerous fear mongering trap of adoption legislation creates many more lifelong problems than it pretends to solve. It’s one thing to choose to have ‘forever friends’ and something entirely different to have a phoney ‘forever family’ forcibly imposed on you by a state or country.
It is time to move beyond personal opinions masquerading as adoption legislation that reduces vulnerable children to pick and choose commodities, that disrespectfully continues in adulthood (to perversely try and stop a legal challenge to adoption legislation) to legally reviewable care arrangements until adulthood for all vulnerable children who are separated from their own families for any reason, so civil society can genuinely strive for better outcomes, for all vulnerable children, despite and regardless of politicians.
The fact, a for example, former Australian PM called Rudd was a ‘professional’ or ‘career’ politician didn’t of itself mean he was either an honest or particularly good politician. His partner is similarly not necessarily simply by being a ‘health professional’ or ‘psychologist’ either honest or good. In fact, they both knowingly and willingly illegally used his publicly funded… political position to exploit as many vulnerable people as possible, including myself (because they could only profit by illegally hiding the harm being caused to me) to make as much money as they can for themselves with a rigged legislative casino. The State Premier clearly has a serious undeclared political and financial conflict of interest. In any event however, a politician who has their own identity cannot convincingly say to a private citizen we do not have the same right to our own identity, just because we are adopted, and politicians adoption legislation says it is not our right to have our own identity, just like a judge wearing a wig cannot convincingly say a drag queen needs a judge’s permission to wear a wig.
I am a law abiding private citizen who is legally entitled to collect my free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat that instead records my birthplace as Jerusalem so I don’t need any permission of a state or country who uses adoption legislation to not keep proper records of any kind, to be Jewish and Mediterranean (which I am) with $1 billion dollars tax free compensation and unlimited freedom of movement to help me peacefully reconnect with my own true family.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
___________
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: State Premier & former Australian Labour PM’s Rudd & Gillard & phoney Labour Federal Opposition Leader Albanese et al know they are not legally entitled to publicly funded legal representation because they are legally liable for illegally using… public office to cover up my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order & political torture & attempted murder of me, along with stopping me living in my own home, to illegally delay end of state run prison of phoney ‘forever family’ adoption legislation for their own personal financial gain (21.10.2021)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The undeniable evidence is the only reason the revolving doors of politicians and their same old political parties who stage corruption inquiries and royal commissions etc is to illegally give themselves publicly funded legal representation, to try and illegally avoid jury trials in actual courts with real compensation for law abiding private citizens.
A politicians public inquiry or commission etc is no substitute for and cannot replace the peace and harmony of the rule of law with a jury in an actual court.
It would obviously have been difficult for anyone to have believed we were ‘brother and sister’ so there is no real privacy with political adoption legislation:
The only reason British politicians did not imprison me in an open prison in the UK when I nevertheless got my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 when I was illegally imprisoned by politicians without legal representation or trial on a non imprisonable alleged offence, is because I would simply have walked out of an open prison to have legal representation and a jury because it is only politicians who cannot explain their actions to a jury in an actual court. In the UK you can be imprisoned including illegally without a jury, but you get a jury if you break out of prison.
I have always been legally entitled to legal representation and a jury to end the state run prison of phoney ‘forever family’ adoption… legislation that has no logical connection to health and well being or multiculturalism.
There are politicians and judges who use political adoption legislation to adopt children themselves, so they can grandstand among themselves about their latest ‘must have accessory’ so political adoption legislation is like the staged inquiries and so on, all about politicians et al who do not like a jury in an actual court.
The politicians always knew an adopted person who rejects adoption legislation that most affects them would be most likely to bring a legal challenge to the legislation in court, so the legislation perversely makes it hardest for the adopted person who has not committed any civil or criminal offence by being adopted, but is most affected by the legislation, to bring a legal challenge in a court, about the political legislation.
It’s abundantly clear politicians know they can no longer legally rely on or use adoption legislation.
I was never that enthusiastic about getting married (I am divorced now) because I don’t like to collect pieces of paper from governments, because adoption legislation that doesn’t keep any proper records is so onerous. I also don’t vote because the same old political parties adoption legislation does not recognize it is my legal right to have my own identity, including so I can meaningfully participate in politics.
The State Premier and former Australian PM’s Rudd and Gillard along with the phoney Labour Federal Leader of the Opposition Albanese et al are and were not legally entitled to any publicly funded legal representation because they are legally liable for illegally using … public office to illegally cover up my Universal High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 and the political torture and attempted murder of me along with stopping me living in my own home, to illegally delay the end of the state run prison of phoney ‘forever family’ adoption… legislation for no other reason than their own personal financial profit. They know they could obviously never deny to any jury, the only reason they got for example the $1.4 billion dollar contract from the British Tories whose lawyer is the so called Labour Leader of the Opposition in the UK called Starmer, that was laundered through Ingeus, was because they illegally covered up my High Court ‘Habeas Corpus’ Court Order from 16th April 2008 etc before Gillard was by no co-incidence grandstanding with the political language of ‘forced adoptions’.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
_______
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: Re: Magistrates Court etc legally obliged to provide written confirmation by email… to me, I cannot as an adult who was adopted be prosecuted in a court for refusing to consent to adoption legislation, so I can get proper healthcare etc (22.10.2021)
Mr KH,
I received your email.
This is to confirm it is the Magistrates Court etc who are legally obliged to provide written confirmation by email… to me, that I cannot be prosecuted in a court as an adult adopted person because I refuse to consent to adoption legislation that has no logical connection to health and well-being or multiculturalism, so I can get proper healthcare etc.
The legally unworkable adoption legislation is legally meaningless political propaganda because I do not as an adult adopted person reasonably believe I can be prosecuted in any court because I refuse to consent to adoption legislation which means I obviously do not need to pay money to or have the permission of anyone in any court etc to have my own identity etc.
(In the event the State Premier et al do not reach a peaceful out of court settlement with me to repay at least most if not all the inextricably linked $1.4 billion dollars they failed to declare their political conflict of interest over, to me, I would need to bring indictments etc for corruption where a jury would agree the State of Victoria who can reclaim the money from politicians are legally liable to repay me the money anyway)
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
_________
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors: My legally enforceable Universal Default Judgement against State of Victoria et al means I am legally entitled to free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat & $1.4 billion dollars tax free compensation because politicians cannot legally arrest, prosecute, imprison, torture & attempt to murder etc me & stop me living in my own home because I am an adopted person who does not consent to political propaganda of legally meaningless adoption legislation that has no logical connection to health & well-being or multiculturalism (23.10.2021)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression, and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The political propaganda of legally meaningless adoption legislation puts adopted people at risk of harm from politicians who are unscrupulous, while most people know there will always be politicians who are unscrupulous.
The undeniable evidence is the former Australian PM Rudd has never stood for peaceful freedom of expression anywhere, and does not oppose Newscorp Scotland Yard Murdoch.
The reasonable and proportionate alternative to adoption legislation of legally reviewable care arrangements until adulthood for vulnerable children separated from their own families for any number of reasons that can happen to anyone, can help provide more positive outcomes and stop politicians who are unscrupulous from illegally using public office to intentionally cause life threatening prolonged physical and emotional harm to others for their own personal, political and financial profit.
My legally enforceable Universal Default Judgement against the State of Victoria et al means I am legally entitled to a free Australian passport in my own identity of Donna Bugat and $1.4 billion dollars tax free compensation from the State of Victoria, because politicians cannot legally arrest, prosecute, imprison, torture and attempt to murder etc me, and stop me living in my own home, because I am an adopted person who does not consent to the political propaganda of legally meaningless adoption legislation that has no logical connection to health and well-being or multiculturalism.
The world will become a kinder place with increasing personal autonomy when there is no adoption legislation, and more easily accessible safe and clean renewable energy.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 