Donna Bugat

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors (Case 352 etc): My ‘Bogan’ Court Order providing choice for adopted people of any race, religion, politics or none to voluntarily register to live in Universal Old City in Jerusalem & permanent injunctions against adoption legislation & British House of Lords, clearly makes peace & harmony of rule of law & democracy genuinely safer & more sustainable (27.07.2021)

I… knew when I was a… small child that adoption is wrong.

The British PM Johnson is the definition of an unscrupulous politician who uses adoption legislation and the British House of Lords for his own… personal financial gain, and political advantage.

There is a prima-facie criminal case against the British PM Johnson, Angus Knight, Murdoch’s Newscorp and the British House of Lords.

I do reasonably expect a stamped court copy of my ‘Bogan’ Court Order for a) permanent injunctions against adoption legislation and the British House of Lords with b) financial compensation of $3 billion dollars from Murdoch’s Newscorp and £300 million pounds from Angus Knight, with c) an absolute right for adopted people of any race, religion, politics or none to register to live in the Universal Old City of Jerusalem.

There is supposed to be easy access to courts for the public to have permanent injunctions, including ex-parte, and the fact permanent injunctions against adoption legislation and the British House of Lords are unavoidable is… never going to change. It is just a case of justice being delayed is justice being denied, at best by manipulative excuses.

No reasonable, rational or responsible person would want the British PM Johnson having any including unfettered… access to… any of their personal information.

The British PM Johnson et al by contrast illegally advocate the barbaric practice of “letterbox communication” in adoption which along with all adoption legislation does… punish an adopted person purely for being adopted, while an adopted person is further… punished for rejecting adoption legislation, all of which does literally treat adopted people… worse than prisoners, to indefinitely maintain a purely… political narrative.

The British PM Johnson will be forced to resign through my receiving financial compensation from Angus Knight and Murdoch’s Newscorp because he will not be able to pay money to any other private companies to use against me.

He has no… legal immunity because there is a) universal jurisdiction and no statutes of limitation b) along with the fact his life threatening crimes against me… began before he was PM, and c) include the continuing use of contracts with… private companies, for his own… personal financial gain.

Johnson (who we proved had illegally had Neil unlawfully arrested in efforts to try and unlawfully arrest me too, when we left the… High Court on 10th April 2013, after I filed papers on 8th April 2013 properly stating they had “no recognised defence in law”) knew:

The undeniable evidence… already is that I am legally entitled to provide a witness statement by email from anywhere for a court including a jury, anywhere, just like I did on 7th May 2013 when I ‘won’ yet another malicious prosecution on 8th May 2013 brought against me in the…. Crown Court in the UK, with a jury, by the now British PM Johnson (who was at that time a highly paid ‘journalist’ and boss of the top cop and the Mayor of London in the UK, while the latest Leader of the so called Opposition Starmer was the DPP) while I was… outside the UK.

It is agreed that my case has universal jurisdiction and no statute of limitations, both because of the crimes committed against me and continuing legislation enabling that.

I clearly do not need to a) physically be in the UK to b) have court orders stamped by the County Court in the State of Victoris with permanent injunctions against adoption legislation and the British House of Lords that includes financial compensation for me.

The incontrovertible facts are the only reason Johnson was able to become Mayor of London (while he was at that time a dual American and British citizen, boss of the top cop, and paid journalist) was because he along with the British Parliament covered up the legal reality of my unprecedented High Court jury lawsuit arising from Mothers Day 2006 and the violent attack by an unknown male assailant on me (the former Mayor of London, the quisling Livingstone and the British Parliament refused without lawful excuse to identify) on 17th August 2007.

The British PM Johnson is already guilty of wilfully obstructing the administration of justice by illegally using his own public office as the Mayor of London (while also a journalist and boss of top cop) and the British PM, to subsequently refuse to then hand over the CCTV of the later torture and attempted murder of me, including in a timely manner.

In practical terms, the only way the British PM Johnson was able to become PM was by illegally refusing to hand over to me the CCTV that belongs to me, not him, of the torture and attempted murder of me, that he has never had any legal ability to impose any conditions on my having, including in a timely manner, which has not happened.

I am legally entitled to not just a permanent injunction against adoption legislation but a permanent injunction against the British House of Lords, along with financial compensation.

The politicians have never had a ‘special privilege’ to enact adoption legislation that in any form will always be disproportionate and unworkable (it is widely agreed the Hague Adoption Convention is unworkable) and the British House of Lords do not have any ‘special privilege’ to enact any legislation.

The British PM Johnson has illegally consistently relied on his own corruption, and the… corruption of public officials and former politicians being rewarded with elevation to the British House of Lords including to continue to illegally legislate to protect both him and themselves, while repeatedly using life threatening state violence to illegally try and stop any High Court jury lawsuits because he and the British House of Lords have no recognised defence in law. He currently relies on a multi-million pound contract with for example a private company Angus Knight to protect him and the British House of Lords.

The evidence is Angus Knight are in breach of their legal obligations that include not being able to provide upon request any evidence of a functioning whistleblowers policy (which they would need to produce to even begin to try and argue anything in a court before a jury) because of their private contract with the British PM Johnson, that has always been intended to adversely affect my physical and emotional health.

I am proceeding with my permanent injunctions against adoption legislation and the British House of Lords along with financial compensation for me (£3 billion dollars from Murdoch’s Newscorp and £300 million pounds from Angus Knight) because I do… intend to legally replace the British PM Johnson, along with the British House of Lords with a publicly elected second chamber with fixed terms.

My permanent injunction against the British House of Lords is not contingent on the House of Lords Reform Act 2014 including because the legal reality is the British House of Lords (where there is no similar institution in for example Australia, the United States, or EU although there are peerages that people usually have to pay to maintain) cannot and do not and could not possibly have a “special privilege” to… legislate, anything.

The intended legal consequence of my permanent injunction against adoption legislation is that politicians will then have to responsibly manage legally reviewable custody arrangements until adulthood for vulnerable children in out of home care until adulthood. This means they will actually need to provide legal representation for… all formerly adopted people (instead of endless legislative adoption woo) while of course other adopted people may want to bring their own different lawsuits.

My personal view is it is for other adopted people and governments to agree whatever they may want following my permanent injunction against adoption legislation, so I have only done my best to identify workable possible recommendations, that are different from my own case.

The British PM Johnson is ultimately responsible for my not living in the Universal Old City in Jerusalem too, because of course I should have been able to rely on dual British and Australian citizenship, to do that, even if I rejected adoption legislation, like I quite properly rejected ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 the British House of Lords et al relied on.

I am asserting my own legal rights through my permanent injunctions against adoption legislation, and the British House of Lords, along with financial compensation for me, to have my own home in the Universal Old City in Jerusalem, because no Jewish person including someone who has been adopted needs to ask anyone else including unscrupulous politicians like the British PM Johnson, or any other Jewish person, to be Jewish and live in the only Jewish State on the Mediterranean and in the world, along with my own home in Melbourne, Australia, that I should have enjoyed since I was a small child. I will also keep my own home in France in the Breton Woods too, because it always was the legal obligation of politicians to peacefully facilitate my permanent injunction against adoption legislation, and then the British House of Lords, without… my being forced to move all the time !!

The British PM Johnson who has had his own identity and the choices accompanying that his entire life, while being afforded every possible privilege remains a person without substance.

An adopted person who rejects adoption legislation, needs a safe and sustainable home, or several, as a starting point to try and work through in our own space and time, having our entire personal history completely erased etc etc.

There is obviously a serious miscarriage of justice because I have proved I have been unlawfully arrested 48 times and exiled (endlessly) because I reject adoption legislation, while Johnson has never been arrested.

The important legal point arising from my permanent injunction against adoption legislation is that adopted people will be able to legally maintain any additional rights of residency, nationality and citizenship we have acquired through adoption legislation, (like I have British citizenship although I do not need to use it) wherever we have lived, while having new choices, including the right to claim political asylum… anywhere.

The people who posed as my parents from the highest echelons of the British and Australian intelligence services (who named me after a mafia boss called Barbara in Melbourne, Australia at a time it is admitted they were spying on the Italian community when looking in a mirror might have proved more useful) could never look me in the eye and claim the adoption legislation in 1984 in Australia was legitimate and that I needed to pay them or anyone else and have theirs or anyone else’s permission to have my own identity, life and family.

The UN cannot contest that an… adopted person of any race, religion, politics or none has an absolute legal right to register to live in the Old City of Jerusalem within the peace and harmony of the rule of law that includes if necessary claiming political asylum anywhere.

The “class” system is pure nonsense because politicians are legally obliged to confer any additional nationalities and citizenships in advance that could then only be renounced by the adopted person:

It does not need pointing out that the Australian (British, French and Israeli) government(s) are all part of the UN, so of course… an Australian court can confirm through my ‘Bogan’ Court Order, my absolute right to register to live in the Universal City of Jerusalem (I would in the absence of adoption legislation have the right to claim political asylum there anyway and in particular if there was a dispute about maintaining accrued additional citizenships post adoption legislation)

A global pandemic does highlight the need to progress from the political policy of poverty that can only be achieved through state violence to kinder evolution within the peace and harmony of the rule of law for safe and sustainable universal health and social care for everyone.

The State of Victoria put in place a sequence of events through adoption legislation that has always caused me prolonged life threatening physical and emotional harm, so they are along with Murdoch’s Newscorp and Angus Knight jointly/severally liable with regard to financial compensation.

It would be illegal for State or Federal politicians in the State of Victoria to be seen to be helping the British PM Johnson (and British House of Lords) harm an Australian citizen, who is a errr… living in Melbourne, Australia and rejects adoption legislation.

Lord Rothermere’s “rabble” of “parliamentary press gallery” journalists (the press et al are used as a diversion from legally arguing about… legislation before a High Court civil… jury) posing as… protesters for Johnson as Mayor of London/paid journalist/boss of top cop (who were all the same people on 16th January 2012 when there was no ‘stay’ on HQ11X00563 or injunction protecting… them) :

The British House of Lords 23rd May 2000 scandal arising from the GLA Act 1999 etc where they would never “allow” an adopted person to reject adoption legislation either:

The facts are the British PM Johnson could never look me or any jury in the eye because he has never had any recognised defence in law for anything he has ever done and does to me, including by using a private company like Angus Knight (which is the same as blacklisting me, which is why I had to sell my own home in the UK too) His entourage of Lords, like the former BBC Chairman Lord Grade from Mothers Day 2006, along with the former top cop Lord Blair or Murdoch’s Lord Marlseford (“we thought we had shot the fox” on 27th January 2012) and Brown’s Lord Balmacara (“the Persil Amendment” on 27th January 2012) et al similarly have no recognised defence in law, (let alone to put before a jury in a court of law) including because the British House of Lords admitted on 23rd May 2000 “successive governments” of which they are a part… intended to (illegally) ban peaceful protest in Parliament, Square, Central London. The reason Lord Rothermere publicly admitted outside a court in 2010 to (illegally) using journalists posing as protesters (to unlawfully arrest Brian and myself) was because the former BBC Chairman Lord Grade had… already illegally leaked my adopted name with false information on Mothers Day 2006, that Johnson continued to do while still a journalist, boss of top cops, and Mayor of London, and dual national American and British citizen) just like the Australian born American citizen Murdoch and the Sunday Times and Lord Marlseford in the UK did etc etc. (Westminster consists of essentially nothing more than a revolving doors of politics and journalism… because of the institutionally corrupt British House of Lords)

It is commonsense, Westminster was just trying to illegally hide I was legally entitled to permanent injunctions against ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005, adoption legislation and the British House of Lords on Mothers Day… 2006.

My adopted name was illegally leaked along with false information to… hide it was… agreed on that date I had High Court jury lawsuits:

My ‘Bogan’ Court Order includes a) permanent injunctions against adoption legislation and the British House of Lords with b) financial compensation of $3 billion dollars from Murdoch’s Newscorp and £300 million pounds from Angus Knight, with c) an absolute right for adopted people of any race, religion, politics or none to register to live in the Universal Old City of Jerusalem.

A kinder evolution is possible.

This statement is true.

Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)