Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors (Case 352 etc): My ‘Bogan’ Court Order providing choice for adopted people of any race, religion, politics or none to voluntarily register to live in Universal Old City in Jerusalem & permanent injunctions against adoption legislation & British House of Lords, clearly makes peace & harmony of rule of law & democracy genuinely safer & more sustainable (21.07.2021)
Re: The legal reality it is a legal impossibility to oppose an adopted person having a permanent injunction against adoption legislation in multiple countries is not going to change.
I… knew when I was a… small child that adoption is wrong.
It’s not okay that my Mediterranean cultural identity was completely erased.
The legal reality is it is a legal impossibility for politicians and courts (who have failed in their duty of care to provide legal representation like on 21st June 2010) to oppose an adopted person having a permanent injunction against adoption legislation, including in multiple countries.
(Of course, it is a… legal impossibility to explain why I was the only person denied legal representation in the British High Court while the British PM Johnson who was Mayor of London had unlimited publicly funded legal representation, as indeed did the spectacle of Lord Rothermere and the “rabble” of Westminster’s “parliamentary press gallery” posing as… protesters !!
It’s a legal impossibility to square Mothers Day 2006, with the fact there was no stay on HQ11X00563 and no injunction protecting Lord Rothermere et al’s ‘protesters’ on… 16th January 2012 either)
Lord Rothermere et al illegally had free… publicly funded legal representation in… politically staged “high profile” legal proceedings (Brian and myself were illegally joined to) they were trying to lose !! :
(It’s obviously seriously illegal for the revolving doors of politicians and press in Westminster to… stage onerous legal proceedings that were entirely for… political reasons)
I have never as a child or adult, had the lived experience of my own safe and sustainable home in Melbourne, Australia where I was born, but was forced to leave when I was a teenager, so I don’t know what that lived experience might be like… either, but I have the legal ability to peacefully make that possible with my out of court settlement.
There is no doubt my own case is… political.
The facts are adopted people who come from all walks of life, from all around the world, are arguably the most diverse minority of people.
The reality it is not possible to stop unscrupulous politicians et al using and hiding behind adoption legislation for their own personal and financial reasons, regardless of some well meaning members of the public, exemplifies why it is only legally possible to have legally reviewable custody orders until adulthood for vulnerable children in out of home care.
It is self evident it is not legally possible to as a starting point make court orders forcing vulnerable children to pretend adult strangers who are carers, are our own parents and family, including forever.
There is no legislation that can legally… punish any adopted child or adult for entirely naturally rejecting adoption, and adoption legislation. Children who have full-time nannies or are sent to boarding school by their parents do not have the same lived experience, nor do adult soldiers who are paid money and given weapons before they agree to be separated from their families, potentially forever.
Most people do not choose to be separated from their family and friends, or their own cultural identity.
The British PM, Angus Knight, the BBC and Murdoch’s Newscorp along with the British House of Lords and State of Victoria can peacefully support me in my out of court settlement, like most reasonable and rational, responsible adults, including a… jury would.
There is no comparable institution to the British House of Lords in for example Australia, the EU or United States, so it makes sense to have a publicly elected second chamber to improve the rule of law and democracy.
What I am saying is not only, not really legally, morally or politically controversial in any way, because reform is positive and do-able.
My ‘Bogan’ Court Order providing the choice for adopted people of any race, religion, politics or none to voluntarily register to live in the Universal Old City in Jerusalem, and permanent injunctions against adoption legislation and British House of Lords, clearly makes the peace and harmony of rule of law and democracy genuinely safer and more sustainable.
The former Australian Labour PM Rudd (who was given a £1.4 billion payout by the British Tories) failed in his duty of care to provide me with legal representation in the British High Court in London on 21st June 2010 because the legal reality is an adopted person is legally entitled to a permanent injunction against adoption legislation.
The… political failure of “successive governments” to provide legal representation in all the true circumstances, is an unconscionable failure in the state’s ‘duty of care’ because it was the State of Victoria and Australian government where I was born, who… originally put in place the sequence of events that put me at risk, including in the UK.
The politicians have courts just rubber stamp what is only political adoption legislation, that disproportionately… punishes the person it dishonestly purports to protect, when you are an adopted person who entirely naturally rejects adoption and it’s accompanying legislation.
The socially constructed adoption argument about “nature versus nurture” is completely false, because most adopted people are no different from most people in… naturally living within the peace and harmony of the rule of law.
What is entirely… natural is for adopted people to want to live within the peace and harmony of the rule of law, like most other people.
I do not need the permission of anyone else, including other Jewish people, or members of the British House of Lords, to be Jewish and live in the only Jewish State in the world, on the Mediterranean, where Jewish people have always lived. A… genuinely multicultural Universal Old City in Jerusalem, clearly means there is a greater opportunity and potential for peace around the Mediterranean region and elsewhere.
The ecologically significant Mediterranean sea which arguably has the most culturally diverse history must be sensitively maintained, and it is obviously reasonable self defence for adopted people of any race, religion, politics or none, to voluntarily choose to register to live in the Universal Old City of Jerusalem which has long been a primary crossroad between European, Asian and Northern African regions.
The facts are Angus Knight who are acting in bad faith illegally breached their own Whistleblowers policy etc, to illegally secure a multi-million dollar contract with the British PM Johnson et al (who has form illegally… staging legal proceedings)
A jury would agree the contract Angus Knight have that is only intended to illegally protect… the British PM, at the expense of an Australian citizen, who is owed the ‘duty of care’ is null and void.
The problem is… unscrupulous politicians who try and hide behind adoption legislation, and rely on… private companies to do so.
The County Court can provide me with a court stamped copy of my ‘Bogan’ Court Order by… email, and the British BBC can… publish a court stamped copy of my ‘Bogan’ Court Order and Angus Knight can pay me £300 million pounds compensation, and Murdoch’s Newscorp can pay me $3 billion dollars compensation. I am legally entitled to financial compensation now, because It is for the State of Victoria, who have the same political parties as Federal Australian politics and British governments along with Angus Knight and Murdoch’s Newscorp who can argue… among themselves over any degree of their own joint and several/shared liability, which should not adversely affect me.
The legal reality an adopted person is legally entitled to a permanent injunction against adoption legislation including in multiple countries… is not going to change.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors (Case 352 etc): Re: Court Order requiring Angus Knight to provide the legal grounds they rely on for their refusal to have a (including functioning) whistleblower policy while instead financially profiting from protecting latest unscrupulous British PM (22.07.2021)
The court previously said when I visited them on 5th July 2021, the Court registrar is the only person in the court who has access to adoption files (which is not the case more generally) so the court registrar has my permission to access my adoption case number 352 this is attached to, because the State of Victoria “put in place the sequence of events” etc.
I would like to have a Court Order requiring Angus Knight to provide their legal grounds for their refusal to the provide legal grounds they rely on for the own refusal to abide by their own whistleblower policy while at the same profiting from illegally protecting the British PM.
It’s self evident the unscrupulous British PM illegally uses adoption legislation etc for his own personal and financial interests (while trying to avoid a jury trial of any kind) that Angus Knight are financially profiting from, and is the… sole reason Angus Knight obtained the contract.
The Court Order should include the costs of the Court Order being met by Angus Knight because a law abiding Australian citizen should not need a Court Order to get Angus Knight to provide in writing by email the legal grounds they rely on for their refusal to abide by their own whistleblower policy while financially profiting from protecting British PM.
Angus Knight should not be able to put people to the inconvenience of needing a court order simply because they refuse to provide legal grounds in writing for their own deliberate failure.
The legal reality remains Angus Knight are legally obliged to show upon request, evidence of a functioning whistleblowers policy, that does not currently exist.
There is a very big difference between a company illegally trying to pretend they did not know something at any given time, and what they did in fact know at all times they improperly used to financially profit from themselves.
(It’s pretty obvious why an adopted person would want a permanent injunction against adoption legislation that is used by unscrupulous politicians and private companies. Of course, they wouldn’t want adoption called out by it’s true name of child trafficking and ‘modern day’ slavery either. The politicians in Australia have never cared that adopted people are adversely affected by the exploitation of adoption legislation by politicians in other countries too. It’s not even simply a case of one country ignoring another country’s adoption legislation because of course none of the countries have ever even been working from the same single starting point of an adopted persons true identity anyway, which may mean nationalities and citizenships that are quite different from what one or more countries may or may not acknowledge defending on the political whims of any given day, that makes all adoption legislation unworkable. It’s not like any governments bother updating adopted people wherever they are, with whatever unworkable legislative whim they recklessly pass for purely political reasons. A reasonable and rational, responsible adult would know Angus Knight only intend to be insulting by using my adopted name, rather than my real name)
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 