Donna Bugat

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors (Case 352): My Mothers Day 2006 Court Order for permanent injunction against adoption legislation etc & ‘golden calf’ of British House of Lords means I have absolute right to political asylum in Universal Old City of Jerusalem, etc (04.07.2021)

I… knew when I was a… small child that adoption is wrong.

The facts are legislators do not have… insurance cover for illegitimate… legislation like adoption legislation that is only a facade to try and make the political and economic policy of child trafficking sound respectable so it can be normalized etc.

1.

My permanent injunction against adoption legislation reflects there is no insurance cover for the legislation that is a clearly wholly disproportionate political… economic policy etc because it is not used against people who have full time nannies, or are sent by their parents to boarding schools etc.

All adoption legislation is clearly not compatible with the peace and harmony of the rule of law. The only reason adoption legislation falsely claims that adopted people need to pay money to and have the permission of courts and anyone else politicians might happen to choose, in a pre-existing case, to stop adoption, and have our own identity, which children with full time nannies and whose parents send them to boarding school do not have to do, is because the only purpose of any such legislation is to maintain the… facade the legislation has legitimacy.

There are politicians like for example the former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder. He was like Murdoch’s Thatcher and Blair with his ‘Third Way’ (who is now the Chairman of the Russian Rosneft etc and like BP etc members of Rosneft’s board, not subject to sanctions) who with one of his very many former wives who was a journalist and is currently a German politician, adopted children from Russia, specifically with Mr Putin’s blessing. What they did is consistent with German politicians… political policy of importing cheap labour in a country with an ageing population, not least since there was obviously nothing stopping Mr Schroeder going to live in Russia, instead.

It is not my “fault” that wildly inconsistent and always changing political and economic adoption legislation is all entirely incompatible with the peace and harmony of the rule of law.

The fact politicians will use adoption legislation… against an adopted person, for political reasons, means there is no real ‘privacy’ for an adopted person, because it is the… state apparatus who are misusing personal information.

The elected and unelected politicians are adults who do know it is only legally permissible to have legally reviewable custody arrangements for vulnerable children in any ‘out of home care’ until adulthood, that could include politicians … making the effort to give irrevocable dual nationality to vulnerable children in out of home care, to genuinely help try and maintain the rights of a child.

It is adults, not vulnerable children, who need to move beyond their ‘make believe’ world of adoption… legislation and accept there cannot in any circumstances be court orders !! that… force vulnerable children to pretend adult… strangers are their ‘parents’ and ‘family’ etc.

It’s not possible for… adopted people to claim political asylum, regardless of any physical and emotional harm caused to us because of the universality of adoption… legislation, and yet if all things were equal adopted people would be legally entitled to an autonomous state in reasonable self defence.

My Mothers Day 2006 Court Order must therefore give me the absolute legal right to have political asylum in the Universal Old City of Jerusalem, which is considered disputed territory.

The facts are the long standing Israeli and Palestinian conflict that affects adopted people too, (Israel and Iran are both signatories to the legal woo of the discredited Hague Adoption Convention) arises from the illegitimate Balfour Declaration because Jewish people have a right to the reasonable self defence of a Jewish State on the Mediterranean where Jewish people have always lived, that is not reliant on the Balfour Declaration or Zionism. The British House of Lords only try and use the Balfour Declaration to try and make out Jewish people are supposed to be… thankful !!!! to them for a Jewish State, most people know Westminster has never genuinely supported anyway.

I should not as an adopted person need to ask anyone else’s permission including that of another Jewish person to be Jewish and live in the only Jewish State, which is where I would most probably have stayed living in 1984 if there had not been all the adoption legislation everywhere.

The example of Catalonia which is mostly in what is now called Spain, with Llivia surrounded by what is now called France, that is an autonomous state that is not a contiguous land mass, and does not have it’s own army, shows there are many options for a Palestinian state. There is similarly the British far from Commonwealth which is not one contiguous land mass, just like there are many Muslim or Catholic states, all around the world, but only one Jewish State.

The Israeli and Palestinian conflict is also unnecessarily standing in the way of far wider possibilities of progress in the Mediterranean region, and beyond. It is clearly possible to have greater freedom of movement for people like in the European Union, around the Mediterranean, and in the Middle East and Northern Africa, all of which do include many Arab and Muslim people, while Jewish and European people are generally excluded from living freely in most of the Middle East and Northern Africa.

Ideally it should be possible for all adopted people of any race or religion who want to, to have political asylum in the Old City of Jerusalem and be exempted from military service with anyone.

2.
I was a single, divorced working mum living in my own home in the UK when I was maliciously targeted and blacklisted by the British House of Lords in Parliament Square, Central London and forced to sell my home, because they never had insurance cover for their false claim of a divine legislative right through ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 etc to try to illegally ban any peaceful campaigns there.

The ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation now repealed (that in purporting in s138 to cover a 1…km radius from the Palaces of Westminster, in a country that uses… miles, the rest of the time, copies the approximate radius of the Old City of Jerusalem) was demonstrably an illegitimate facade, like the PRSR Act 2011, because Hansard in the British House of Lords on 23rd May 2000 states it is the… intention of “successive governments” to illegally ban peaceful protest, specifically in Parliament Square, Central London.

The tyranny of the British House of Lords who try and impose the… false idolatry of…. themselves, on the public, never had any… insurance cover for this:

The British House of Lords did know they could not get… insurance cover to ban peaceful protests in Parliament Square, Central London.

In fact, the evidence is the facade of the legislation was illegally used to provide cover for the state apparatus to come near us, and invent ANY false and malicious allegations because otherwise there was… no manipulative excuse for the state apparatus to be anywhere near us.

The BBC do not and did not have any insurance cover to illegally leak my adopted name with false allegations about alleged criminality, by me, all of which they knew to be untrue on Mothers Day 2006, that, unlike most leaks, (more generally) was when used against me… intended to physically and emotionally harm me, to stop a permanent injunction against the illegitimate British House of Lords.

I wasn’t causing any physical or emotional harm to anyone by my peacefully campaigning in Parliament Square, Central London, but the BBC who illegally leaked my adopted name with false information on Mothers Day 2006 did… intend to… permanently physically and emotionally harm me.

It wasn’t simply a case of just libel, by the BBC, because the BBC publicly lied about… criminal legal proceedings against me, that they did know were really against politicians et al and in particular the British House of Lords.

There is no comparable ‘institution’ to the British House of Lords in Australia, the United States or EU, so it was the British House of Lords who illegally stopped my Mothers Day 2006 Court Order, while taking the UK out of the EU, by signing Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty on 13th December 2007, because a British House of Lords, instead of no second second chamber or a publicly elected second chamber of some kind, was not legally sustainable within a progressive European Union.

It is probably more likely than not, that a publicly elected second chamber in the UK, instead of the British House of Lords, would result in further referendums on the London Mayoralty and the EU, because the British House of Lords has so consistently and seriously undermined any real democracy in the UK.

It can never be said any member of the public voted for the British House of Lords !!

The British House of Lords have never cared about democracy and have only used any and every war, including the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria to avoid being democratized… themselves.

The facts are the British PM Brown belatedly signed Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty on 13th December 2007… after they knew I had ‘won’ the decisive legal ‘victory’ at Southwark Crown Court with SteveJ, on that same day, over all the cases maliciously used to try and hide Mothers Day 2006.

(The City of London ‘hedge funds’ can obviously buy the fastest algorithms based on insider trading that relies on the British House of Lords, but we all proved it is possible to change legislative ‘assumptions’)

The only reason the British government dishonestly tried to claim I had not ‘technically’ arrested Livingstone, on 9th April 2008 was because they could not explain (including to any jury) why the Palaces of Westminster went into lockdown, while the armed police from Palaces of Westminster et al had helped him to escape !! instead of assisting me, because they did all know about Mothers Day 2006, and the British House of Lords (which is why the Charing Cross and Belgravia Police could not show up, so the Palaces of Westminster had to go into lockdown while police from there came to try and cover everything up) A pompous ITV/ITN journalist with Livingstone ridiculously said to me “you can’t arrest the Mayor of London” to which I responded “I just have”. Livingstone tried to hide his face from members of the public because he didn’t want them to know what was going on, when I used minimal force, to simply take hold of his ‘manbag’ which he obviously wasn’t going to leave behind. Livingstone and the British House of Lords had covered up a truly vicious violent attack on me by an unknown male they illegally refused to identify. The SO17 armed police who… knew me and… spoke with me… agreed when I explained to them what I had done, that what I did was lawful. Livingstone was so cowardly not wanting to appear in court over a violent assault on me he covered up where I was violently punched… in the head !! by my temple.

The British House of Lords also used for example a false and malicious allegation from a now former Tory MP Alan Duncan, a ubiquitous oil and ‘commodities’ trader, who was paid £160,000 pounds, to illegally imprison me without legal representation or trial on a non imprisonable alleged s5 Public Order offence !! that never happened, during the London Mayoral election in 2008. There was no-one in Westminster who wanted the Mothers Day 2006 scandal emerging during the 2008 Mayoral election.

The former Mayor of London, Livingstone was happy to try and… misuse personal information about… adoption to try and exile me so… he could try and avoid appearing in court:

It would obviously be a legal impossibility for the Tory MP Alan Duncan to deny before a jury that he was paid £160,000 to cover up Mothers Day 2006.

Rupert Murdoch and the former Tory MP Alan Duncan were both linked to a… Marc Rich, variously through Glencore, Vitol, Trafigura and Fox News.

The Westminster parliamentary press gallery were falling all over themselves to cover up my High Court… Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008, ever… being published, by for example the BBC, who never would have published it, because the huge scandal by that time, would not only have seen the £160,000 paid to the Tory MP Alan Duncan, to commit perjury, paid back to me with interest, and then some, but could only have included the permanent injunction against the British House of Lords.

The so called ‘expenses scandal’ at that time was covering up there is no legal scrutiny of the… British House of Lords business interests or expenses because they claim they cannot be voted out by the public.

A jury would agree following the change-over between top cops (now Lord) Blair and Stephenson on 2nd October 2008, before the subsequent arrest of the Tory MP Damien Green involving a search of his Parliamentary office on 27th November 2008 without a warrant was staged for public consumption by politicians and police, on the basis the British House of Lords intended to provide ‘legal cover’ for the Tories using the manipulative excuse of s17(1)e of the PACE Act 1984, to illegally search us without a warrant (they could not get) to give them another opportunity to be… near us to make up ANY… false and malicious allegations.

The British House of Lords “parliamentary press gallery” subsequently tried to claim a very many years later, in 2016, after I was… exiled, from the UK, that Livingstone was expelled from the Labour party for anti-semitism and that the Israeli government had wanted to ‘take down’ the Tory MP Alan Duncan. The Melbourne and Australian born Israeli Ambassador to the UK at that time, a Mark Regev did reasonably know it was about adoption legislation (which is also a scandal in Israel too) and the British House of Lords.

Of course, the Palaces of Westminster did know I have Jewish, Catholic and Muslim ancestry.

It would be deeply offensive to try and pretend I would need “the permission” of the likes of Labour’s Livingstone or the Tories Alan Duncan or the British House of Lords to be Jewish !!

3.
My permanent injunction against adoption legislation, ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 and the ‘golden calf’ of the British House of Lords (rather than the PRSR Act 2011, because they have proved they would just illegally continue to retrospectively legislate) is because they (like Angus Knight and Murdoch’s Newscorp) do not have insurance cover for the torture and attempted murder of me or to cover that up.

The British House of Lords et al do not have… insurance cover for this:

Angus Knight has failed to produce an… insurance policy that says they can cover up the torture and attempted murder of me, because they could not possibly have one, just like Murdoch’s Newscorp do not have an insurance policy for what they illegally wrote about numerous malicious legal proceedings against me on for example 30th January 2011.

This pack of lies was not okay:

The elected and unelected politicians and press do not have a divine right or insurance cover to publicly… lie about very serious legal proceedings… against a private citizen, which went way beyond any libel case.

This statement is true.

Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)