Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & ors (Case 352): My Mothers Day 2006 Court Order with permanent injunctions against adoption legislation & British House of Lords includes pardons over criminal prosecutions because it is more important to have sustainable change for a kinder future for everyone (01.07.2021)

I… knew when I was a… small child that adoption was wrong.

I now know it is possible to have kinder evolution without PTSD, which I didn’t know when I was a small child.

My Mothers Day 2006 Court Order with permanent injunctions against adoption legislation and the British House of Lords, includes my giving pardons over criminal prosecutions in my own case, because it is more important to have sustainable change for a kinder future for everyone.

__________

Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors (Case 352)

My Universal Mothers Day 2006 Court Order -v- the State of Victoria and Ors (ie: Lord Blair of Boughton, the BBC, Murdoch’s Newscorp & Angus Knight) that is proportionate, legitimate, accountable and necessary in a democratic society provides for:

a) a permanent injunction against adoption… legislation

this means adopted people are legally entitled to upon request, the basic minimum of a no questions asked financial equivalent to disability support pension, along with medical, travel and accommodation costs paid for by governments, which is the best ‘no fault’ deal governments can negotiate, that is essentially a ‘universal basic income’.

b) the replacement of the British House of Lords with a publicly elected second chamber before the next general election in the UK (that has elections every time there is a general election or every five years, that could also lead to second referendums on the London Mayoralty and EU)

… to help re-unite people within the peace and harmony of the rule of law.

The British House of Lords proved no adopted person needs to ask the permission of or pay money to any politician or public official who in the case of the British House of Lords would refuse to hand over the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, as an… adopted person, in a timely manner.

It is irrelevant whether or not I live in the UK.

c) there is… mandatory recording, by public officials and private contractors with government contracts, of complaints of state sponsored torture and attempted murder

d) immediate financial compensation for me of £200 million pounds from Angus Knight, and $3 billion dollars from Murdoch’s Newscorp who have profited from my adoption and the torture and attempted murder of me

e) the BBC and their ‘World service’ are legally obliged to publish a stamped court copy of my Mothers Day 2006 Court Order

f) I have a case manager… in France who unravels all the global ‘bureaucracy’ of my adoption for me.

g) my Court Order includes any relevant indemnities/pardons over any criminal prosecutions arising from my ‘civil’ case, if my Court Order is agreed now, because it is more important to have sustainable change for a kinder future.

__________

I, or SteveJ, can if necessary temporarily be sworn in as a Magistrate/s or Recorder/s in Melbourne, Australia, to sign and stamp my Court Order etc, which is legal, unlike the political theatre of the British House of Lords, Lord Pip of Maltravers in the UK, or judges and world leaders who have adopted children.

There wouldn’t be a ‘world economy’ without mums.

This statement is true.

Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)