Donna Bugat (Case 352): My Mothers Day 2006 Court Order that I could not do when I was a small child when I was nevertheless legally entitled to a… jury to repeal the heresy of adoption… legislation, reclaims my title, while illegitimate British House of Lords lose theirs etc (23.06.2021)
I… knew when I was a… small child that adoption was wrong.
‘Reported Conduct’: British House of Lords – UK – Murdoch – Ms Therese Coffey MP – EDF – France – DWP – Catch 22 NGO – Angus Knight – Australia
Angus Knight are financially profiting from a) my adoption and b) the torture and attempted murder of me.
My Mothers Day 2006 Court Order that I could not do when I was a small child (when I was nevertheless legally entitled to a… jury to repeal the manipulative excuses of adoption… legislation) reclaims my ‘title’ of Donna Bugat while the illegitimate British House of Lords lose all theirs.
The British House of Lords ‘class’ system who epitomise ‘insider trading’ (while there is no comparable ‘institution’ in Australia, the EU or United States) use manipulative excuses to legislate to protect… themselves from eviction, have consistently unfairly legislated including retrospectively against vulnerable children with adoption… legislation.
It is self evident the heresy of adoption… legislation (that like all legislation involves the… entire state apparatus) is invalid because people who have a full time nanny, or are sent to boarding school don’t lose their identities or have to pay money to and go to courts and have their or anyone else’s permission including that of self entitled Lords, to have their own identity, while the hired help cannot change their nationalities or citizenships.
The reality is a… jury would back me with my Mothers Day 2006 Court Order against the illegitimate Global British House of Lords (and their private contractors) who have in my own case, in what is not a popularity contest, consistently and… retrospectively… legislated against me, including with criminal legislation against a law abiding civilian, to keep giving… themselves an increasingly unfair advantage.
I am an adopted person who properly opposed the ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 free speech ban only for the elected and unelected politicians when that failed, to use life threatening torture in an attempt to murder me, before refusing without lawful excuse to hand over the CCTV to me, including in a timely manner, so they could then retrospectively legislate against me, yet again with the PRSR Act 2011 !!
The British Establishment in Westminster illegally leaked my adopted name on Mothers Day 2006 along with false information to illegally try and stop my having a High Court civil jury, because they did know a High Court civil jury would back me, and conclude the British House of Lords do continuously illegally legislate to give themselves an unfair advantage, including against vulnerable children, so the British House of Lords should lose all their titles and entitlements and be evicted.
I was blacklisted from my paid employment as a single working mother living in my own home, I was forced to sell, in the UK, while I could not complete my degree, while I was also a voluntary chair of a bereavement charity etc.
Murdoch & Ms Coffey MP publicly lied about the meetings between himself, now British PM Johnson and the Sun Editor, while saying “powerful forces” were waged against me:
I nevertheless peacefully defended free speech and opposed war for the benefit of everyone.
The politicians don’t like civil or criminal… juries to have legal scrutiny of… legislation because that would mean less… legislation
The… facts are the British House of Lords which is essentially run by Murdoch’s deceit conducted the arguably invalid referendum on the London mayoralty in 1998, that only attracted a voter turnout of 34% to spin whatever they really wanted through legislation with the GLA Act 1999.
That was the same time, there was an arguably equally invalid referendum on the British monarchy in Australia in 1999 because the illegitimate nature of… compulsory voting creates a false positive result because people are legally entitled to register their disapproval of any/all candidates by voting for “none of the above”.
The ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation against Brian (SOCPA 2005 also repealed the Royal Parks Police who became part of the Metropolitan Police because Royal Parks did not want to get involved in stopping peaceful campaigning in Parliament Square, Central London) and subsequently the PRSR Act 2011 against me, happened because unelected politicians stated intention in Hansard on 23rd May 2000 in the House of Lords they knew a jury would overturn, was to illegally prevent any legitimate peaceful campaign in Parliament Square, Central London.
The politicians don’t like civil or criminal… juries to have legal scrutiny of legislation because that would mean less… legislation.
I demonstrably proved it is the case of whenever the Westminster robber barons legislation is just properly challenged peacefully, they try and… retrospectively legislate their way out to gain an increasingly unfair advantage again and again, which is not only unfair, but undemocratic and obviously unlawful.
There are many obvious problems with the democratic deficit of the British House of Lords (with no comparable ‘institution’ in for example Australia, the EU or United States) that can have an … unlimited number of people appointed (so the facade of the entire House of Commons could unilaterally elevate themselves to the unelected House of Lords) without any time-limit or democratic scrutiny of any kind (politicians and public officials who are corrupt can simply be elevated to the House of Lords to be involved in… legislating their own cover-ups… without being voted out) so it is very easy for… unscrupulous people like Murdoch to use bribery and money to seize overall control.
The GLA Act 1999 purported politicians could hand over part of Parliament Square, Central London, to the hereditary possession of the British Queen which she obviously knew was untrue because she didn’t make any claim that is albeit opaque) with the land registry until 2008, because our lawsuits could possibly repeal the GLA Act 1999 too.
The politicians falsely claim they can decide what peaceful voluntary work people can do, which dismisses and discriminates against the many hours… mothers for example contribute to the global economy… throughout our entire lives.
Murdoch has never been seen in Parliament Square, Central London let alone defending free speech, because he has always been too afraid to step outside his comfort zone while surrounding himself with the likes of the cult of Hollywood spinning the global… adoption industry for profit too.
Murdoch & Ms Therese Coffey MP:
One of Murdoch’s mouthpieces, a Ms Coffey did know she was being dishonest when she claimed in 2011 during the staged Leveson Inquiry there was a “witch-hunt” against the Sun Editor (who had tried to bribe me in April 2010) and specifically defended… Murdoch, because the only very well publicised and documented witch-hunt in Westminster over many years with Brian and myself being “dragged between police cells and courts” that included refusing without lawful excuse to hand over the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me !! specifically resulted in… legislation maliciously targeting me.
Ms Coffey did know she was lying:
The BBC and Murdoch are clearly not ‘victims’.
It is self evident that if Brian and myself had proper and timely access to a…. jury, the legislation against us would have been repealed, because ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 was not repealed fully until March 31st 2012 after PRSR Act 2011 was maliciously made against me. The House of Lords did not want any civil or criminal jury to see the House of Lords Hansard from 23rd May 2000 because that showed the legislation was indeed… malicious.
It was Murdoch’s Lord Marlseford who expressed ‘regret’ in the House of Lords on 27th January 2012 they had failed to “shoot the fox” on 16th January 2012 etc that involved the City of London police too.
The de Grailly, Foix (incl. Cathar) L’Isle-Jourdain, de Goth and Le Bugat, Lacour, Agenais etc family (Ariege, Navarre, Barcelona, Urgell, Catalonia, Avignon, Dufort, de la Poles, Calais, Knight Order of Garter, Suffolk, Monaco, Oujon, Geneva, Switzerland, Sirmione, Lago di Garda, Italy, Jerusalem & Syria, and 16th January 1305 etc)
You miss out on learning so much fascinating personal history when you are adopted.
Any reasonable and rational law abiding civilian adult knows there is in fact no legitimate excuse for the refusal to record the ‘reportable conduct’ of the use of life threatening torture (universal jurisdiction and no statute of limitations) in the attempted murder of me, which even according to the House of Lords Reform Act 2014 makes of itself the British House of Lords illegitimate.
Murdoch’s Ms Coffey had resigned from the BBC to become an MP for Suffolk and nuclear power in 2010 in the UK’s ongoing alliance with the French EDF (I lived for six years in my own home in the autonomous Breton Woods non nuclear region in France from 2013 after I was exiled from the UK and before I was forced to return to Australia in July 2019 because of my… adoption because 90 countries are involved in the Hague Adoption Convention) who since 2020 have a renewable energy project near Biloela in Queensland in Australia.
The Australian government managed to sign a $ 90 billion dollar nuclear deal for submarines with the French government while I was living in France, but haven’t repealed adoption.
The only way to stop adoption is with a permanent injunction against adoption… legislation.
The only reason I am not living in my own home in France is because of adoption… legislation.
_______
The conflict of interest between Angus Knight/ Coffey DWP/ Catch 22 NGO
The British government entered into a corrupt contract between the owners of Angus Knight in Australia with Murdoch’s Ms Coffey at the DWP in the UK and a phoney British NGO called Catch-22 (who have a member of the British monarchy as a patron, along with a trustee formerly from the GLA Chief Executive when Livingstone and Johnson were London Mayors, and a senior employee Mr Illich who was the senior ‘special adviser’ to the former British PM Theresa May in 2019 and had previously ‘advised’ the GLA et al too) for £200 million pounds on the sole understanding Angus Knight would illegally try and cover up my now unprecedented jury lawsuit that can also be heard in Case 352 in Australia.
Any… audit of Angus Knight proves I had complained in writing they only use what they do know are manipulative excuses to act illegally.
Angus Knight know the adoption and torture and attempted murder of me are a problem and haven’t tried to help me at all, because they have a corrupt contract with British and Australian elected and unelected politicians, not to.
The facts are the owners of Angus Knight are in breach of not only their own published ‘policies’ with regard to ‘reported conduct’ (that it is not possible for me to be ‘anonymous’ about in my case, because it was the UK who originally illegally leaked my adopted name) in having refused without lawful excuse to record the reported conduct of the torture and attempted murder of me (that a reasonable person would know has adversely affected my physical and emotional health with PTSD and autoimmune and related illnesses including pernicious anaemia etc)
The facts are I have taken all reasonable and lawful steps I can, while politicians have refused without lawful excuse to hand over the CCTV to me, including the… original, that I arguably have copyright over too (that I never had to give any undertakings over, or return (that while Starmer should have handed it over to me while he was the DPP, could obviously have been sent by courier or post to me, that I was always legally entitled to use to bring a criminal prosecution):
It is widely known politicians outsource the work of civil servants to private contractors so they all profit from government… corruption.
It is beyond all reasonable doubt a jury could only conclude the multiple state actors and their private contractors were and are acting illegally, so I am obviously claiming in My Mothers Day Court Order:
a) the… permanent injunction against i) adoption legislation to be filed in Geneva, including against the Hague Adoption Convention and ii) the House of Lords who having long been in (more than even) Contempt of Court over the refusal to hand over CCTV to me including in a timely manner which does of itself attract a criminal sentence of more than 1 year against the House of Lords as per the House of Lords Reform Act 2014, and iii) Angus Knight
b) £200 million pounds compensation from Angus Knight et al, along with the $3 billion pounds compensation from Murdoch.
(It is well known I have always had court orders from the Crown and High Courts that I can legally serve people by email which I have properly done)
My permanent injunction against adoption… legislation and the British House of Lords, and Angus Knight along with compensation is non-negotiable, although I do recommend further democratic improvements.
It is possible to have an elected second chamber in the UK that would inevitably lead to second referendums on the London Mayoralty, and the EU which is going to happen anyway, along with a publicly elected First Nations President in Australia and publicly elected State Governors of any Australian ethnicity to replace the British imposed and controlled unelected Australian Governor General and State Governors.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
__________
25.06.2021
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria & Ors (Case 352): Re: Angus Knight et al
I attended a meeting at the office of Angus Knight this morning.
They asked me if I was recording, which only seemed like just another manipulative excuse to me.
It is after all, Angus Knight who failed to disclose to me their serious financial conflict of interest arising from their multi-billion pound private contract with Murdoch mouthpieces, who Angus Knight did know have refused without lawful excuse to hand over the CCTV ‘trophy footage’ they do not own any copyright over, of the use of… life-threatening torture in the attempted murder of me, including in a timely manner, that is at the very least… an admission of guilt.
A jury would not accept any manipulative excuses over the refusal to hand over the CCTV to me.
The staff at the offices of Angus Knight were unable to confirm, including in writing by email if Angus Knight are contesting my lawsuit or not, and claimed there was no management there (or who would identify themselves as such) and that curiously they had no ability to speak to any management… themselves, so… my time was wasted, with at best manipulative excuses.
I explained today (when I served staff) that a jury will back me against Angus Knight if they wish to contest anything.
I do reasonably believe that Angus Knight intended to waste my time today, because they did know they made a contract (they are legally obliged to disclose to me) with Murdoch mouthpieces who they knew had refused without lawful excuse to hand over evidence in very serious criminal and civil legal proceedings.
The transnational nature of the private contract between Angus Knight & Murdoch mouthpieces also further confirms their knowledge that my case has universal jurisdiction and no statute of limitations, so it can be joined with Case 352 and heard in either Australia or in the UK, before… a jury.
The only reason the diversion of what I proved was a… pattern of malicious… prosecutions etc against me happened (I did not even have to return to the UK and give evidence in Southwark Crown Court in the double act between the now British PM Johnson and Leader of the Opposition Starmer who were the London Mayor and DPP in May 2013) because the Murdoch mouthpieces always knew a… jury would back me in… my lawsuits against them, over proper legal scrutiny of corrupt… legislation.
So Mr James Williams who is the ‘Commercial’ Manager at Angus Knight and Mr Peter Homan who is the Chief Financial Officer at Angus Knight will need to notify me… by email before 10am on 5th July 2021 at the latest, if they wish to… contest my lawsuit against them, because they do know about the unlawful refusal to hand over the CCTV of the use of life threatening torture in the attempt to murder me.
My legal position is there is no reasonable excuse for why Angus Knight did not notify me by email last year !!!! when Angus Knight were fully aware they had a financial conflict of interest in making a multi-million pound deal with Murdoch’s mouthpieces.
It is a matter of fact the Westminster system consists of politicians and public officials who are… corrupt being elevated to the House of Lords to… legislate their own cover-up because they cannot be voted out in public elections. The House of Lords Reform Act 2014 is window dressing for public consumption, because of course it is possible to sue members of the House of Lords without that legislation.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 