Donna (Case 352): My Mothers Day Court Order for First Nations Australian President, publicly elected second chamber in UK, with phased in complete freedom of movement of citizens between Australia & UK, and second referendum on London Mayoralty & EU with $3 billion dollars compensation from Murdoch’s Newscorp for me (20.06.2021)

I… knew when I was a… small child that adoption was wrong.

It is self evident there are no legal grounds for an adopted person to… recognise what is onerous adoption… legislation.

People who for example have a full time nanny and are sent to boarding school are not obliged by anyone including a court, to call or consider the adult strangers looking after them, as their own… family. Nor do they have to pay a court and have their permission or that of anyone else, to have their own identity, and their nationalities and citizenships cannot be changed by the hired help and any court.

_______________________

The fact anyone claims a duty of care to look after a vulnerable child did not and does not transfer our own rights to anyone else, or convey any sort of ownership of us, including as an adult. The ‘tort of conversion’ cannot apply to human beings.

The legal reality is properly informed adopted people who are not legally obliged to recognise adoption legislation or the Hague Adoption Convention do nevertheless keep any… additional residencies, nationalities, citizenships and the accompanying rights etc we have accrued through our adoption and adoption legislation that is not our… fault.

It is only legally permissible to have legally reviewable custody arrangements for children until adulthood.

A jury would not consider it is a co-incidence there was a meeting in the UK at 8am on 8th December 2006 between the London Mayoralty, the top cop and IPCC, over Mothers Day at the same time there was a briefing for the… Australian Senate about the UK House of Lords… because a properly informed… jury that I had always been legally entitled to, would give me this court order.

The British and Australian Parliament’s both knew at that time, that I had not done anything… wrong, but instead that I am an adopted person and the referendum on the London Mayoralty which only had a 34% voter turnout that led to the GLA Act 1999 and SOCPA 2005 that should… all have been possible to legally challenge with a… jury before … Lord Kerr’s Article 50 referendum became part of the Lisbon Treaty on 13th December 2007 (… after I won a malicious prosecution against me at Southwark Crown Court also on 13th December 2007 when I didn’t have a… jury) essentially revolved around the fact there is no similar ‘institution’ to the British House of Lords (where the entire House of Commons could unilaterally declare themselves members of the unelected House of Lords too, that also does not have any limit on the numbers of members that in practice leads to improper influence inside and outside the UK anyway) in for example, Australia, the United States or EU.

The revolving doors of elected and unelected politicians are being… manipulative when they make legislation that only has… excuses, about trying to avoid the proper legal scrutiny of a jury, because they do know the legal scrutiny of a jury would mean… less legislation. The unelected House of Lords in the UK which doesn’t pass any sniff test for fair competition, is nothing more than a cash for legislation without any proper scrutiny racket.

It is self evident, no-one had any legal authority to subsequently legislate or give… royal assent to the PRSR Act 2011 made against me in the UK, because it was always only intended to try and… overtake my… jury lawsuits.

The PRSR Act 2011 proved the British monarchy would give royal assent to malicious legislation against… one person, where the legislation is of itself a Contempt of Court.

It is a matter of fact the British PM Johnson and Leader of the Opposition Starmer (the one party Murdoch et al mouthpieces, posing as two parties) who were formerly the London Mayor and Director of Public Persecutions subsequently lost what was a… jury trial against me at Southwark Crown Court in May 2103 (that ‘arose’ from the malicious use of the PRSR Act 2011 to try and orchestrate… other bogus charges) after I was exiled from the UK in April 2013 and so I was living… outside the UK in the EU and did not need to return, because they had all failed without ‘reasonable excuse’ and in a timely manner to hand over the CCTV of the use of life threatening torture (over which there is universal jurisdiction and no statute of limitations that they are acting in Contempt of any Court over) in the attempted murder of me.

7th May 2013:

8th May 2013:

20th May 2013: (that became my HQ13X etc.. ie: another.. jury lawsuit against the government)

It should have been possible to repeal adoption… legislation including the Hague Adoption Convention, and peacefully settle my accompanying lawsuits, while I was living in my own home in France, and before I was forced to return to Australia in July 2019, which is not to say I would not mind having the ‘lived experience’ of an Australia without the burdens of adoption legislation and the colonial left over of a Governor General.

My Mothers Day Court Order in the County Court of the State of Victoria, is obviously legally… valid in for example Australia, France and the UK, but will only need to be filed in Australia if the terms of my Court Order which is a fair compromise is agreed.

The fact British citizens (incl. those who voted to leave the EU who are mostly monarchists) would be welcome to have phased complete freedom of movement with Australian citizens (which should have happened… before perfidious Albion joined the EEC/EU) would also suit the monarchists in Australia, who want to be “more British than the British” (who would then be free to visit the monarchy in the UK or live there) does not mean Australian citizens are legally obliged to recognise and welcome the British monarchy (who could only visit or live in Australia as private citizens) or the colonial left-over of a Governor General.

Australian citizens are legally entitled to make our own reasonable decisions, that means it is far more fairer and sensible to have a publicly elected First Nations President in Australia rather than the colonial left over of a Governor General, like there is similarly a President in Israel that recognises the fact Jewish people have always lived around the Mediterranean.

It is so past it’s use by date for there to be a Governor General in Australia, who doesn’t really have any… legitimate legal authority, including to… issue passports for Australian citizens.

It is common-sense, the belated House of Lords Reform Act 2014 actually confirms that Murdoch’s Newscorp owes me $3 billion dollars compensation (even a Contempt of Court involving Murdoch and his… employees like Lord Marlseford et al refusing to hand over the CCTV to me, is obviously so serious it would have attracted a court sentence well in excess of one year) that includes any reasonable fee from of the County Court issuing a stamped copy of my Court Order to me, by email (the County Court can send the Court’s ‘original’ copy of My Court Order to my home address in France that legal records prove, the Australian government including the BDM have had since they issued a document in my name stamped 29th April 2015, to my home address in France)

The legal reality is the fact my Court Order is not disputed (including that I have properly notified) means the County Court in the State of Victoria is legally obliged to simply provide me with a stamped copy of my Court Order (in whatever legal language is agreed with me)… by email (which is as if I was still in my own home in France)

Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)