Donna Bugat (Case 352): My Mothers Day 2006 Court Order to abolish adoption legislation & replace House of Lords with publicly elected second chamber, providing for second referendum on London Mayoralty & EU with $3 billion dollars compensation from Murdoch Newscorp for me, is compatible with House of Lords Act 2014 & Universal Jurisdiction (18.06.2021)

I… knew when I was a… small child that adoption was wrong.

The legal reality is the true facts and circumstances of my case are my Mothers Day 2006 Court Order (that is valid in Australia, the UK and EU) also ‘invites’ the British House of Lords to retire, resign or face… criminal prosecution.

It’s quite fitting really that an Australian citizen who was adopted should effectively sack the British House of Lords. It’s fair to say that would right a considerable number of historical wrongs.

______________________

---

I was raised by the universal Fremantle intelligence services (Vice Admiral Fremantle was Nelson’s right hand man at the Battle of Trafalgar) who sent me to London as a teenager where I lived and worked during the dark years of Thatcher who became a Baroness in the House of Lords, and like Lord Marlesford who in 2006 was a Director of the Times and the Barings New Russia Fund, are all mouthpieces for the likes of Murdoch.

Blair was elected as an MP on the basis of leaving the EU, and Labour were elected on the manifesto of reform of the House of Lords before Blair and now Lord Hague who is now also on the Murdoch payroll, were only grandstanding over the House of Lords in the House of Commons in 1998 because of course there is…. no comparable ‘institution’ to the House of Lords in Australia, the United States, or EU.

The fact is elected and unelected politicians did know my court order from Mothers Day 2006 (when politicians and the robber media barons illegally published my adopted name along with false information) would abolish adoption legislation and the House of Lords because of the… legislative deceit behind ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 (which is why they illegally published my adopted name along with false information)

The politicians love nothing more than the diversion of a royal commission that provides them with free legal representation.

The House of Lords Hansard 23rd May 2000:

A jury would agree that Lord McIntosh… intended to and was speaking for ‘both houses and black rod’ when he said on Hansard on 23rd May 2000 (I learned all about legislative ‘intent’ from the bogus ‘landmark’ Contempt of Court case brought against Brian and myself in the High Court in 2007 that was really about trying to keep our jury lawsuits out of the High Court) with regard to the GLA Act 1999, that successive governments had agreed to ban… any peaceful campaign in Parliament Square, that it is obviously illegal to do.

My Mothers Day 2006 Court order is ultimately against the House of Lords whose political theatre of a referendum on the London Mayoralty (I couldn’t vote in because I was not living in London) that despite relying on a voter… turnout of only 34% that is arguably illegitimate was used to try and illegally stop peaceful campaigning in Parliament Square, Central London with the GLA Act 1999 and then SOCPA 2005 & the PRSR Act 2011 that was only all about the House of Lords own self preservation.

We already know the for example former top cop and now Lord Blair from Mothers Day 2006 profited from legislating against me in 2011 etc, because… he has consistently failed without ‘reasonable excuse’ and including in a timely manner, to produce any witness statement from… himself, or an… Inspector Lyons from Mothers Day 2006, that included also being cross examined before a jury in any court.

The agreed facts are the London Mayoralty (GLA) the Chair of the IPCC (Nick Hardwick) and the top cop claimed they had a briefing at 8am on the 8th December 2006,

which by happenstance “co-incides” with a briefing given to the Australian Senate on the 8th December 2006 about Murdoch et al’s British House of Lords (which would also explain the phoney number 666 worn by a City of London police officer on 10th April 2013 after I went to the High Court on 8th April 2013 and filed papers the government had no recognised defence in law)

The only reason the British ‘class’ system persists and arguably worsens is because politicians and public officials know that if they ignore the peace and harmony of the rule of law they can simply be elevated to the House of Lords to participate in… legislating their own and others cover up.

The Palaces of Westminster knew on 7th March 2007 when the House of Commons voted for an elected second chamber, before HH Judge Wadsworth declared on 8th March 2007 in Southwark Crown Court that Parliament Square was “my home” which I did not ask him to do, before the House of Lords voted for… themselves on 14th March 2007 that I am an adopted person who has a ‘casting’ vote so to speak from Mothers Day 2006.

Blair’s crony Lord Falconer weasel words in the House of Lords vote for the… continuation of “appointment” rather than a publicly elected second chamber.

There was the curious instance of Lord Pip of Maltravers (‘overlooking’ the fact of our having “no case to answer” over ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 in the Magistrates Court !! because it was “void ab initio”) to say in the government’s failed bogus ‘appeal’ to the High Court in 2007 (when the government also had an ‘amicus curiae’ who it was confirmed did not speak for or instead of us) saying that we “had better make a deal” when Lord Pip of Maltravers could not as a member of the House of Lords, himself, since 1999, claim to be a disinterested party.

A jury would agree it was unconscionable that Lord Marlesford who is Murdoch’s mouthpiece knew he was covering up the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me when he expressed ‘regret’ in Hansard on 27th January 2012 at having not “shot the fox” when referring to having illegally legislated the PRSR Act 2011 against me.

The House of Lords were still refusing to reform on 6th August 2012 which was after it is a matter of fact, I was in the High Court in London about my torture etc lawsuits on 5th August 2012.

It is incompatible with the peace and harmony of the rule of law for people like Lord Wood of Anfield in the House of Lords (who was an ‘adviser’ to the former PM Brown, and crony of Jack Straw, when Brown was late illegally signing a Lord John Kerr’s Article 50 in the Lisbon Treaty on 13 December 2007 in the knowledge I had an… outstanding court order from Mothers Day 2006, that was against the House of Lords, which my ‘decisive’ legal ‘victory’ at Southwark Crown Court on 13th December 2007 confirms) before essentially claiming (with his ‘Good Law Project’) there should be no legal aid funding for… vulnerable children who are adopted, but instead vulgar populist ‘crowdfunding’ for… elected and unelected politicians like himself.

The phone records of the Judiciary at Southwark Crown Court on 13 December 2007 informing the government the court had… no alternative but to abide by case law in a higher court ruling would be interesting:

The legal reality is vulnerable children who are adopted do not have any including… timely access to… legal representation, because the true legal reality is only legally reviewable custody arrangements for children until adulthood are possible.

It is commonsense, my Mothers Day 2006 Court Order should have taken precedence over Lord John Kerr’s Article 50 in 2007 that was really only about preserving the British House of Lords.

There is no reason any properly informed adopted person would ever go along with the manipulative excuses of adoption legislation, that includes politicians and public officials falsely claiming adopted people have to pay and have the permission of elected and unelected politicians like the House of Lords !! to have our own identity.

It is way beyond an ‘absurdity’ to say I would effectively need to have the permission of and pay the likes of Murdoch and his bought and paid henchman in the House of Lords to have my… own identity.

The staged… Lord Leveson ‘Inquiry’:

It is a matter of fact that successive governments failed to… disclose in a timely manner and… in legal proceedings what Lord McIntosh said in the House of Lords on 23rd May 2000, that led to the torture and attempted murder of me, and my being forced into exile… again because elected and unelected politicians similarly refused without lawful excuse to hand over the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me.

The CCTV they were all refusing to hand over to me:

It is far better to peacefully replace the inbred cronyism of the illegitimate House of Lords who are bought and paid for by people like Murdoch who enable the likes of Blair and Johnson, with a second publicly elected chamber that will inevitably invite a second referendum on the London Mayoralty and EU.

The legal reality is My Mother Day 2006 Court Order in the County Court of Victoria does have universal jurisdiction because I am a) an adopted person who b) the unelected politicians in the House of Lords in the UK do not deny they tortured and attempted to murder on behalf of the likes of Murdoch.

The Palaces of Westminster thought nothing of falsely and publicly portraying me as a criminal to violently attack me, to stop any proper scrutiny of their… legislation.

I was already exiled from the UK too, by 2014 because of the torture and attempted murder of me:

The incontrovertible evidence is the House of Lords never cared about British nationals living in or outside the UK in the EU during the EU referendum.

There is no elected politician who can defend the House of Lords.

I never agreed that those who used life threatening torture on me (over which there is universal jurisdiction, and no statute of limitations) in their attempt to murder me and those who enabled them… should not face criminal prosecution, so the only compromise really possible is the House of Lords resigning, retiring or facing… criminal prosecution.

The House of Lords Act 2014 mostly reflects the true facts and circumstances of my case (that has universal jurisdiction and no statute of limitations) that I would have had the court order to abolish adoption legislation and the House of Lords, even if elected and unelected politicians had not tortured and attempted to murder me, so my Court Order ‘invites’ members of the House of Lords to retire, resign or face… criminal prosecution because the facts are the House of Lords are going to be replaced with a publicly elected second chamber.

Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)