Donna Bugat (Case 352): My stay/permanent injunction against adoption legislation & House of Lords incl. robber media barons, with $3 billion dollars compensation from Newscorp &… unprecedented court order for publicly elected second chamber in UK could more likely than not produce new political party & second London Mayoral & EU… referendums (16.06.2021)

I… knew when I was a… small child that adoption was wrong.

There are no… legal grounds that would make any properly informed adopted person go along with adoption… legislation that is nothing more than politically motivated manipulative excuses.

The fact the legal department in the DOJ in Victoria have not notified me in writing by email they are opposing my stay/permanent injunction against adoption legislation means that I should have it without needing to go through the onerous ordeal of actual court proceedings.

That can then be filed in the British courts etc.

The true legal position turns out to be, elected and unelected politicians illegally stopped my … unprecedented court order on Mothers Day 2006 against the British House of Lords in the UK, for an elected second chamber, which should obviously have come… before their EU referendum.

So the political deceit over Mothers Day 2006 is very serious.

__________________________

---

The former British PM Blair who has only ever been robber media barons mouthpiece was originally elected on a promise of leaving the EU, before Labour being elected on the promise of genuinely reforming the House of Lords in the UK, before they instead used the diversion of the referendum on the London Mayoralty & GLA to… preserve the House of Lords.

The legal reality is I… preserve any additional nationalities and citizenships arising from my adoption, despite my stay and permanent injunction against adoption… legislation.

The London Mayoralty with the accompanying GLA is and was at best a very expensive publicly funded political vanity project. In fact, the bogus referendum on the London Mayoralty and GLA in 1998 that it is strongly arguable is illegitimate because it only had a 34% voter turnout, was really intended to use the subsequent GLA Act in 1999 to preserve the illegitimate unelected House of Lords, by illegally stopping peaceful demonstrations in Parliament Square, Central London.

I lived outside London, like Brian, at the time of the London Mayoral referendum so we could not vote on the London Mayoralty & GLA that with the GLA Act 1999 etc, adversely affected us in Parliament Square, Central London, while preserving the House of Lords.

The politicians and their robber media barons orchestrated personal and extremely violent life threatening physical attacks on myself and others for the sole purpose of distracting from the very serious legal issues about their… legislation, that is not always compatible with the peace and harmony of the rule of law.

I was unlawfully arrested on Mothers Day 2006 in the UK when my name was illegally leaked to the robber media barons along with false information, because the House of Lords et al that includes members of the Judiciary, who knew they legislated the GLA Act 1999 to illegally stop peaceful campaigns in Parliament Square, Central London, knew on that day, I was legally entitled to a court order to… disband the House of Lords, that would also at the very least lead to a stay/permanent injunction of adoption legislation and a second referendum on the GLA Act 1999.

My adoption in Australia “put in place a sequence of events” that led to my being maliciously … targeted by elected and unelected politicians in the UK too.

All that really happened is I am an honest law abiding civilian.

It would be a legal impossibility for anyone to dispute elected and unelected politicians used the London Mayoralty & GLA primarily… against Brian and myself in Parliament Square, Central London.

The House of Lords et al (not Brian and myself) “put in place a sequence of events” with the referendum on the London mayoralty etc.

The… ‘class’ based Westminster system… did know my repeal of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 that should have happened on Mothers Day 2006 would (inevitably lead to a stay/permanent injunction against adoption legislation, and the House of Lords who stated on 23rd May 2000 when talking about the GLA Act 1999 that their intention was to preserve themselves, by stopping peaceful campaigns in Parliament Square, Central London) result in an extraordinary and unprecedented court order from a jury, for a publicly elected second chamber to replace the House of Lords.

The SOCPA 2005 legislation that also abolished the Royal Parks Constabulary, and the later PRSR Act 2011 which was specifically made to cover up the torture and attempted murder of me, while trying to roll out an extra layer of GLA style Stasi ‘government’ across the country, were extensions of the GLA Act 1999 that was really only designed to protect the House of Lords where peerages are headed out like confetti.

The former PM Blair… does know that he was stopping me giving evidence in Marylebone court on 13th December 2006, over Mothers Day 2006, while he was spinning his cash for honours, that was really cash for… legislation, imbroglio, with the robber media barons et al on 14th December 2006.

The House of Lords…cash for legislation protection racket:

I could obviously never be found to have any case to answer over my unlawful arrest on 23rd May 2006 too (which was what was before the ‘courts’ in December 2006 too) because umm… I was never charged with anything !! (which also explains why Brian, who was not arrested on 23rd May 2006, could also only be found to have ‘no case to answer’)

Blair and Murdoch et al were really raking in… cash for legislation (Blair was notorious in his zeal for legislation)

There are many people involved in the cover up over Mothers Day 2006 like Lord Blair, Paddick, Hooligan Howe and Baroness Jones (from the GLA) who received peerages. Sir Ken Jones was obviously promised Australian citizenship !! when he was made DAC in Victoria, Australia because of his role in the Mothers Day 2006 cover up in the UK to protect the House of Lords etc.

It is commonsense British and Australian politicians have… no legal grounds to defend the House of Lords.

It would be a legal impossibility to claim a… Lord John Kerr who invented Article 50 for the British referendum on the EU, in the Lisbon Treaty on 13 December 2007 that was also about creating the EU as a ‘legal personality’ was interested in anything other than preserving the House of Lords.

The true legal position is Brian and myself stood in the way of Westminster’s EU referendum, because I should have… first had the court order disbanding the House of Lords, before any Westminster referendum on the EU, so it turned out we stood in the way of Westminster’s EU referendum.

The former PM Brown did know that it was completely illegal for him to sign up to Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty on 13 December 2007 which he was late doing because the court records show I won the ‘decisive’ legal ‘victory’ at Southwark Crown Court that very same day.

There’s no doubt the House of Lords were using Article 50 as a diversion to preserve themselves.

The evidence is Murdoch illegally covered up his meetings with Johnson and the Sun Editor in the days before he illegally spun his lies about far from legal proceedings in the Sunday Times on 30th January 2011, while the other robber media barons fell into line, knowing that by illegally refusing to hand over the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, including in a timely manner that they were covering up the torture and attempted murder of me.

Murdoch had previously profited from illegally publishing a picture of me in the Sunday Times that turned out to be from a case where he was working with Special Branch who admitted their involvement, and Blair et al, before I was kidnapped from inside a court on 19th July 2007, during live proceedings to stop me giving… evidence.

It is well known that Murdoch et al publicly threatened on Sky News on 19th July 2009 to illegally ‘remove’ us without any caveats on how that was done.

It is a matter of fact, the Sun Crime Editor tried to bribe me over another ‘incident’ in April 2010 involving someone the Metropolitan Police claim they arrested for impersonating a police officer, while Murdoch claims the man was a police officer seconded to the National Crime Agency from Thames Valley Police.

It is not disputed I was illegally stopped from giving evidence in the High Court on 21st June 2010 etc etc when it wasn’t even a jury.

It was more than seriously illegal and unconscionable for Murdoch’s mouthpiece Lord Marlesford who is a Director of the Times to express ‘regret’ in the House of Lords on 27th January 2012 that legislation was not used to shoot me, in the knowledge he was directly involved in covering up the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me !!

The for example, Lord Marlesford cannot hide behind the House of Lords to say whatever he likes, while also a Murdoch mouthpiece at the Times.

It does not follow that the fact robber media barons may be wealthy means they are honest and truthful, but it does all mean that Murdoch’s Newscorp owes me $3 billion dollars compensation over the cash for legislation etc.

I don’t personally know what it would be like to live in Australia without the burden of adoption… legislation that has caused me so much life threatening physical and emotional harm.

I do know the French government have no legal grounds to stop me living in my own home in the Breton Woods in France, because of my stay/permanent injunction against adoption… legislation and the fact, I oppose the British House of Lords !!

The referendums on the London Mayoralty and the EU are similar in many respects, because the House of Lords were not honest about their only real interest with either, was their own self preservation. So people were a) not… properly informed in advance about any deal to vote on that b) in practise excluded people who lived outside London in the case of Parliament Square, Central London, and referendum on the London Mayoralty, or British nationals living outside the UK in the EU on the EU referendum, who could nevertheless be c) adversely affected including by not being represented or able to vote on whatever any ’deal’ would really be, that was ultimately agreed solely between elected and unelected… politicians.

The problem with Australian politics is also in many respects similar to the UK and EU, in that Australian politicians are used to simply repeating whatever is legislated through the… British House of Lords too, that has wielded improper influence in for example the EU that has no comparable ‘institution‘.

It is more likely than not that a publicly elected second chamber to replace the House of Lords in the UK could result in a) a genuine third political party in the UK of b) young people, that c) could also peacefully campaign to rejoin the European Union.

I would personally like to share my time between my own home in the Breton Woods in France, and Australia to experience what life is like without adoption legislation and politicians kowtowing to the British House of Lords.

Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)