Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Murdoch’s Newscorp & Australian Governor General (Case 352): My Counter-claim & (Default) Judgement for peaceful return to Universal Old City in Jerusalem with $3 billion dollars compensation is reasonable self defense because there is no political, religious or royal ‘discretionary’ power incl. of any court, to use adoption to (in part or whole) erase any identity incl. DNA (26.03.2010)

A transition from Adoption in – Universal Old City in Jerusalem

I… knew when I was a small child (and the only responsible adult in the room, who was not being listened to) that it was… wrong for adult strangers (who in my own case happened to be from the highest echelons of the British and Australian intelligence services) to use adoption to pose as my parents, godparents and family to arbitrarily… erase my own… autonomous identity, including (in part or whole) my name, culture, nationality and citizenships.

The problems of inequality arise, specifically through the abuse of legislative power that is inconsistent with the autonomy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law.

I was raised in the deeply authoritarian ‘Whites Only’ Australia during the Vietnam War when conscription was re-introduced while the governments trafficked many thousands of children who were not even orphans, using the global multi-billion dollar adoption industry.

It is manipulative and deeply offensive when adults claim they are discriminated against if and when they cannot adopt vulnerable children.

It is absolutely unlawful to discourage and punish adopted people, which is what adoption currently does, by creating all sorts of far from legal obstacles, that are put in the way of an entirely natural desire to have the autonomy of your own real identity.

Commonsense:

It is so… commonsense that it is only legally possible for responsible adult carers to have legally reviewable custody arrangements for vulnerable children until adulthood, where the problem lies with politicians, and prospective adult carers if that is not enough for them. The ‘make believe’ world of adoption cannot legally… force people to call complete strangers who are adults, their parents or family, including for life. No responsible carer should ever even want any court order to that effect. Any legally reviewable custody arrangements that leave considerable scope for responsible negotiation, do not necessarily preclude governments automatically conferring… additional citizenships for vulnerable children if that supports their lives, with responsible adult carers, but it does mean that existing identities, that include citizenships of vulnerable children, or any automatically conferred additional citizenships, cannot ever be revoked without the permission of the person they were conferred upon.

There should never be a system that demands vulnerable children have to at any time have the permission of any government or to pay any money to have their own identity as a child or adult.

Where did the commonsense of the peace and harmony of the rule of law go ?

I would have applied for political asylum based on my adoption many years ago if it had been at all possible, when I was originally exiled from Australia as a teenager because of my adoption (the intelligence services wanted me to join so they could get me to sign the ‘Official Secrets Act’ to use over my adoption which I refused to do for the obvious reasons, and before I was then exiled from the UK to France and the Australian State and Federal governments breached non-refoulement by forcing me to return from my own home in France, to Australia in July 2019, because adoption legislation should have been repealed while I was still in my own home.

My personal view is there is so much historical revisionism used in adoption it is entirely possible Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene and had children.

***********************

I thought it would be a good idea to have my own little boutique blog called Donna Bugat so I can truly ‘own’ and enjoy using my real name which does feel really good 🙂 🙂 to me (while regardless of and despite the fact the state falsely claim they can extort money from me before my real name they stole, because there was always an intention by the state to… permanently deprive me of my real identity, is ‘officially’ recognized by them all of which is extremely… manipulative of them)

****************

A global celebrity endorsed multi-billion dollar adoption industry, ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 & Murdoch’s cash for legislation against me.

A ‘Public Interest’ Test:

My counterclaim etc in Case 352 is about my stay/permanent injunction preventing the use of all adoption legislation is effectively a repeal of adoption which is both an unnecessary and disproportionate interference that does not meet any public interest test, and is not compatible with the peace and harmony of the rule of law, includes $3 billion dollars compensation from Murdoch over his cash for legislation !!… against me.

It is self evident that if anyone opposes my counterclaim and my Default Judgement in my favour then they would have to explain in the first instance why I have not a) had a jury b) in a timely manner c) why as the adopted person I would need to pay any money to bring a counterclaim against the State of Victoria et al in the case against me (I did not for example have to pay any money to bring a counterclaim in ‘satellite litigation’ in the UK in HQ11X00563 that involves Murdoch too)

____________________

My intention is to a) repeal adoption legislation while b) claiming financial compensation from Murdoch, who has always illegally sought to ‘sidestep’ any jury in a court for a long time (by hiding behind and trying to leverage adoption legislation with his own quite astonishing… cash for legislation !! in 2011 against me)

It is absolutely unconscionable that Murdoch was able to… buy information about adopted people, from politicians and public officials, while adopted people are expected to pay money for our own private information !!

______________________

The man who posed as my godfather was head of ASIO in 1984 when he profited from additional adoption legislation, when I happened to be in Israel and the Middle East, while the legislation sought to delay or prevent lawsuits arising from the fact there is no legal basis for adoption legislation.

The Hague Adoption Convention is a legally unenforceable global free for all that is nothing more than a political veneer for a multi billion dollar adoption industry that uses legislation to commodify vulnerable children, that has no connection to child protection not least since the intention of discriminatory legislation is that it continues without any legally reviewable scrutiny into adulthood.

There is clearly no ‘public interest’ in arbitrarily replacing the autonomy of a vulnerable child by… erasing in part or whole their identity, including to prevent access to medical or genealogical information, that stops an adopted person as a child or adult, being able to make informed choices about their own health and well-being that most other people are able to take for granted.

The use of adoption legislation on vulnerable children that seeks to forcibly impose the pseudo science of ‘Bowlby’ et al’s ‘attachment theory’ on adopted people (which was presumably funded to try and justify imperial era legislation from 1926, which is the same year as the Balfour Declaration about White Australia) while clearly having no logical connection to child protection, because it continues into adulthood, is objectively ‘at best’ an apologia for paedophiles and Stockholm syndrome.

The British and Australian politicians illegally leaked my adopted name in the UK on Mothers Day 2006, along with false information to their parliamentary press gallery, through New Scotland Yard (refer Murdoch ‘journalists’ in the staged Leveson extravaganza) using the false pretext of ss 132-135 SOCPA (Serious Organized Crime and Police Act) legislation because they knew that legislation that was an abuse of process that was not in the public interest, had to be repealed, that would also lead to the repeal of similarly framed ‘imperial era’ adoption legislation globally.

It is a legal impossibility to explain why the British PM Blair and the top cop Blair along with Livingstone did not immediately resign on Mothers Day in 2006 along with the ss 132-135 SOCPA 2005 legislation being repealed then and there too, many years before it’s belated repeal in 2011.

The facts of Mothers Day 2006 were never going to change, regardless of the following 48 unlawful arrests, torture and attempted murder and Murdoch’s cash for legislation against me in 2011.

(The seriously anomalous ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation with Corbyn allies like Diane Abbott voting with the DUP from Northern Ireland to violently ban free speech on mainland UK, included exemptions for unions, like the Police Federation and National Union of Journalists and so on who did not oppose war)

It was very clearly in the public interest, and not at all criminal, for members of public to peacefully oppose so much war that disproportionately affects defenceless civilians.

I took the fair and sensible position (unlike the unions) of repealing the ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation for the benefit of everyone.

`The facts include a jury would conclude there is more than a reasonable suspicion that Murdoch who profited from the Iran Contras scandal by becoming an American citizen on 4th September 1985 which happened to be the same day as the 21st birthday of my little sister I missed because I was illegally raised separately from her, and one day before my eldest son was born on 5th September 1985, originally… intended to murder me in the UK on 4th September 2006, which was twenty one years after he became an American citizen, and we proved I was unlawfully arrested and also missed my eldest son’s twenty first birthday on 5th September 2006.

The government were on that occasion forced to hand over some CCTV of myself being attacked on 4th September 2006, when I lawfully tried to get help because SteveJ was being attacked by the government who it was proved were trying to illegally destroy his camera footage, while we were typically dragged through the courts in the subsequent attempted cover up.

I was unlawfully ‘arrested’ etc 48 times in a public space supposedly open to anyone, and despite the fact I never so much as blocked a road, climbed a building or practiced civil disobedience of any kind or even refused to wear a mask during a global pandemic, because no-one had ever done what `Brian and myself did in Parliament Square, Central London together, and in my own case, between 2005 -2013, and despite the fact I… already had PTSD because of the true facts and circumstances of my adoption.

The obvious reason Murdoch was involved was because he has politicians et al … literally on his payroll including while like himself posing as journalists too, and particularly in the revolving doors of Westminster, so ordinary private citizens like myself challenging legislation which has historically been very unusual, threatened not only his his false political, but financial profits too.

The facts are Murdoch along with successive Prime Ministers, and Mayors of London who are and were bosses of the top cops, and an Acting Inspector Cole also covered up a violent attack on me by an unknown male assailant whose identity was illegally hidden by the Palaces of Westminster (ie: “both houses and black rod”)

There were three successive cases involving Murdoch, among many the government lost throughout 2007, when according to witness statements and evidence he was working with the PM Blair (before he was finally forced to resign) along with Special Branch (refer what Westminster call ‘spycops’ with the usual staged inquiry that are only ever about providing free legal representation for… politicians who were very… publicly involved in maliciously prosecuting me) including to in one instance try and ‘suffragette’ me. That resulted in my being kidnapped by the government from… inside a court… during live proceedings on 19th July 2007 to stop me giving evidence (it was subsequently agreed by courts the government had put in place “a sequence of events that put my life at risk” that took place, while a bogus ‘landmark’ Contempt of Court case involving Brian and myself was at the same time !! being staged in the High Court to try and keep us out of there) A jury could only conclude the “sequence of events that put my life at risk” involving 19th July 2007 was directly connected to Murdoch getting Cameron to put out a contract to harm me/us without any caveats on Sky News on 19th July 2009 that was unquestioningly… repeated by the BBC on the same day.

A jury would conclude beyond all reasonable doubt that Murdoch et al was clearly directly involved in the torture and attempted murder of me on 4th September 2009 and that the government refused without lawful excuse to send the original (or even a copy) of the CCTV to me that the criminal courts and Starmer as the DPP at that time, could have sent to me themselves, and should have been sent to me or a person nominated by me in a timely manner by registered post or courier, including without a City of London lawyer, who is… in practice working for Murdoch, trying to make all sorts of at best manipulative excuses, and conditions. I was always entitled to have the original CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me that I would have to produce an expert witness to testify to a jury had not been tampered with by… the government who repeatedly not only tampered with, but sought to destroy evidence, and particularly if a jury was involved.

It was obviously my own personal… choice to make regarding whether to proceed by way of the criminal or civil courts, which would have involved juries. If I was forced to proceed by way of the civil courts would have nevertheless questioned the actions of Starmer (now Leader of the Opposition) as the DPP (who has in practice always acted like a lawyer from his own Doughty Chambers defending Murdoch too) and Johnson as a paid journalist, boss of the top cop, and Mayor of London all at the same time (who is now the British PM).

Mothers Day 2006 – 4th September 2006 – 17th August 2007 – 4th September 2009

A jury would reasonably conclude… even without the CCTV from 4th September 2009, but based on the facts including Mothers Day 2006, the CCTV the government edited from 4th September 2006, while trying to destroy SteveJ’s evidence, that nevertheless shows the government acting illegally, and the cover up by the Palaces of Westminster over the violent attack by an unknown male assailant on me on 17th August 2007, that the… only reason the government wanted to then hide the CCTV from 4th September 2009 is because the life threatening… torture (over which there is no statute of limitations) and attempted murder of me is obviously… even worse than what their edited CCTV from 4th September 2006 showed.

The facts are Murdoch was involved on 19th July 2007 and 19th July 2009 and there is a reasonable suspicion, the government had intended to murder me on 4th September 2006, before they had then failed in an actual attempt with the torture and attempted murder of me on 4th September 2009 because Brian heard me scream out.

I was only a ‘veteran’ of being unlawfully arrested:

My unlawful arrest at the State Opening on 25th May 2010 (several weeks after Murdoch’s crime editor from the Sun had tried to bribe me to cover up another attack on me) when my adopted name was yet again illegally leaked !! involved the usual suspects (an Acting Inspector Cole had motive to harm me because he was originally involved in covering up the violent attack by the unknown male assailant on 17th August 2007 etc etc) who did not realize Brian’s video recorder he handed to me when Cole unlawfully arrested him was still recording when Cole unlawfully arrested me before Cole is heard telling other police officers who do question him for his reasons that they should sit together to agree their witness statements before going out to celebrate with a drink) before the BBC illegally published audio they edited that was widely repeated by Murdoch et al at Sky News etc.

Someone who (for example) a) covered up the violent attack by an assailant he and Westminster refused to identify, along with b) the torture and attempted murder of me, is deliberately getting in my personal space while yelling in my face:

It is a legal impossibility to explain why the newly installed PM Cameron, Johnson, Starmer and Corbyn who all publicly lied did not immediately resign, on 25th May 2010, along with the ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation being repealed. By that time the government was illegally using searches purporting to be under s(17)e PACE Act 1984 that obviously did not apply and were not related to any emergency in an area under 24/7 CCTV where the government also used infra-red imaging along with routinely using sniffer dogs in the wider area, and snipers on the rooftops. A jury would conclude the only reason for the use of the illegal searches the government could never have including repeatedly obtained … court orders to do were in fact to bully, harass and intimidate us while maliciously inventing false pretexts to unlawfully arrest us.

(It is beyond all reasonable doubt a jury would have concluded all those involved who had failed in their attempts in courts, to try and (for example) restrict our peaceful campaign to our both having a total of 3 metres, together (I often also campaigned at for example Downing Street too) could not come closer than 1.5 metres to either Brian or myself)

It is a matter of undeniable fact the now British PM Johnson who was Mayor of London in 2010 lied after I legally blew the whistle on 21st June 2010, before I was illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010:

when the Australian Labour PM Rudd who resigned on 23rd June 2010 and was given a $1.4 billion brown envelope by the Tories to profit from zero hour contracts, who never opposed Murdoch (although there is a reasonable suspicion Rudd knew about the intended torture and attempted murder of me on 4th September 2009)…

… and then later the Leader of Westminster Council in the ‘overlapping’ HQ11X00563 (which was withdrawn on 4th May 2012 after I had filed a counterclaim that covered them all they did not ever contest) fronted malicious High Court proceedings to try and in particular distract from Mothers Day 2006 and the torture and attempted murder of me in 2009. The Leader of Westminster Council a Mr Barrow was forced to resign on 16th January 2012 to protect Johnson and Murdoch, et al, after proceeding despite admitting on American TV on… February 1st 2011 in front of me that I hadn’t done anything wrong which both he and Johnson illegally hid from admitting in the High Court.

The facts are Murdoch lied about absolutely everything in a Sunday Times article that illegally names me… again !! on 30th January 2011. He claimed there were “powerful forces” working against both Brian (who was in Germany at that time) and myself in what Murdoch falsely claims is a “legal game of cat and mouse” which would insult the intelligence of anyone, and not least since Murdoch did know he was covering up the… torture and attempted murder of me !!

In fact no-one has ever seen Murdoch in any public square defending free speech or trying to save defenceless civilians lives, and he feared being cross examined on a witness stand in a court before a jury, which is very different to his using journalism to hide behind, to lie, so he was also envious of us because what we did and achieved was by comparison real, and threatened his false profits.

(It was well known, I personally opposed the Muslim Brotherhood when they subsequently hijacked protests in Egypt when young people wanted change, and the Muslim Brotherhood only wanted to… impose the same ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 !! I was trying to repeal in the UK)

Murdoch cash for legislation involving inhuman and degrading treatment intended to cover up torture and attempted murder.

The facts are Murdoch paid cash for legislation against me (which is obviously even worse than cash for questions) in 2011 with s143 etc of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011, that was beyond all reasonable doubt, just a political veneer to cover up the torture and attempted murder of me, that by no stretch of the imagination even passes any ‘public interest’ test.

The Murdoch payroll who had…. already covered up violent attacks on me including the torture and attempted murder of me !! expressing ‘regret’ I had not been shot because the veneer of Murdoch’s cash for legislation (to try and cover up the torture and attempted murder of me) has failed on 16th January 2012:

Murdoch’s own Lord Marlseford a Director at his Times Newspaper lied (as Murdoch had lied about me on 30th January 2011 in the Sunday Times Article) about the legislation and myself on Hansard on 27th January 2012 when he publicly expresses ‘regret’ over not having shot me (I am the only person who was headlined on 16th January 2012 politicians could be talking about because I am the… only one they had tortured and attempted to murder and could not prosecute using the veneer of their new legislation that only targeted me, that left me unmoved when they stole my shelter)

I was literally the only person Murdoch made their… 2011 legislation against.

I was not a journalist in an embassy, but Murdoch has while posing as a journalist… ALSO paid cash for legislation against me, to cover up the torture and attempted murder of me.

It was clear the (retrospective) legislation premised on supposed (‘sleeping equipment’) was a shallow veneer because the government repeatedly violently attacked me and… stole my shelter, including an umbrella when I was (and fellow campaigners were)… wide awake. I am like most people who sleep in our own bodies, and there is obviously no…. public interest in ‘arresting’ and ‘prosecuting’ people for that. Westminster Council did try and fail to bring the first ‘private prosecution’ in the world for my being in peaceful possession of an umbrella in a public place which they abandoned, that was all the most serious legislative… diversion from the pre-existing torture and attempted murder of me.

January – April 2013

It is a legal impossibility to explain why I am treated so differently from Murdoch’s long time paid mouthpiece, the politician and journalist Gove, who claims he is adopted and supports arbitrary adoption legislation, because of course I should have (regardless of any other citizenship I may wish to claim) British and Australian passports in… my real name, paid for by the respective governments if there was no… discrimination.

In the middle of winter in January 2013 (while I had been subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment for the past year in their attempts to cover up the torture and attempted murder of me) an unidentified male in plain clothes accompanied by two large MET Police came along and tried to steal my umbrella while I was… awake and it was… snowing. While I was trying to determine the identity of the plain clothes male, and what was going on, a large police officer who had alarmingly been wielding a knife (I had when I was unlawfully arrested on April 11th 2009 been mugged at knife-point outside Lambeth police Station after I was released) who was much larger, came up behind me when I was facing away from him and complaining to the unidentified male about the knife) and without warning grabbed me around the neck and kicked my knees forward and from under me, all at the same time, so I fell to the ground, which a reasonable person would know was… intended to damage my neck and back, if not break my neck, which is what it felt like. I managed to ask what on earth they were doing, and the unidentified male who could not answer, then claimed he was arresting me, without explaining why. I then informed him in front of a witness that I would immediately need what I knew was high resolution CCTV from the Palace of Westminster that I had observed was focused on what was going on (because that was where the orders he was following clearly came from) that would prove he was acting illegally and he looked towards the CCTV and immediately de-arrested me, before hastily retreating with their stolen booty in tow, that was replaced by others. My boyfriend Neil turned up and made me go to the hospital (the government already knew by that time, my for example, left eye had been damaged by the violent attack on me in 2007 when I was viciously punched in the head) and I was quite ill for a long time afterwards. (I had a lot of problems with both my neck and back etc for a long time, and my back still gives me some problems along with the autoimmune and related illnesses etc) The unlawful actions of the government were very clearly disproportionate. What we then did was just leave the banners there so the government could not pretend we were ‘sleeping’ there, and campaign members were free to go along when they wanted, while we focused on trying to progress the High Court jury lawsuits, which the government scratched their heads over because they were violently attacking us and stealing property (they had to keep returning) when we were… awake !! When the government then threatened to steal the banners (without taking us to court) SteveJ was then awake there one evening when… he was unlawfully arrested and other campaigners threatened. So Neil and I returned and while we were discussing the situation at the back of Parliament Square, Central London, and waiting for Steve to be released, we noticed that Westminster Council had sneaked along so we realized they had unlawfully arrested SteveJ to try and steal the banners. When Neil (who had been violently attacked in 2012 after I confirmed to the High Court I wanted a jury in my lawsuits, which was my right) and myself appeared out of the shadows, Westminster Council took one look at us and scuttled off quickly, without a word, because it was then proved they unlawfully arrested Steve while he was awake, just to steal… the banners, which were not part of their phoney new legislation.

In March 2013 the Australian Labour Federal government of Gillard was grandstanding with political language about forced adoptions that is not a recognised legal term, along with the Liberal government in the State of Victoria which saw a Ms Woolridge who did not do anything to help adopted people resign in March 2020 to be replaced without any election by a Murdoch approved adopted apparatchik, like Gove, who have been buying time with another ubiquitous inquiry which is only about providing free legal representation… for politicians !! which is seriously unfair.

When I filed papers in the High Court in the UK on 8th April 2013, the government(s) had no recognised defence in law to anything they had done, they illegally lured us to court to supposedly arrange a date for a ‘case management’ hearing, that could and should have been agreed by email, they refused to do, and then kidnapped Neil (who they knew was seriously ill) when we left the court. I managed to keep my distance, and was able to keep talking to SteveJ on the phone, who wasn’t with us because he had to be at hospital that day. My own PTSD etc was truly appalling by that time (I had difficulty finding my way to Bishopsgate where Neil was being held) and so we were forced into exile. Murdoch has never been through what… he put me through.

It is very serious that Murdoch a) paid cash for the facade of legislation in 2011 (that his own bought and paid for Director at the Times admitted on parliamentary Hansard had failed on 27th January 2012) that was b) being used to cover up Mothers Day 2006 that led directly to the torture and attempted murder of me in 2009, and my being forced into exile… again.

It is obviously absolutely unlawful that a) someone can buy legislation to b) try and cover up torture (knowing there is no statute of limitations) and attempted murder.

I was forced into exile and France was technically the first country I entered where I then lived in my own home (when the Australian government then started waving around the not inconsiderable sum of $90 billion dollars for 12 submarines with a country they do not so much as have a health or social security agreement with to protect their ‘own’ citizens.

I obviously could not apply for political asylum because of my adoption, which is the underlying reason because there is no legal basis for adoption.

Notes:

I am not personally a Zionist and I do not support what was always a duplicitous Balfour Declaration in 1917 because the legal reality is it was reasonable self defence (long before Two World Wars) for a Jewish State on the Mediterranean where Jewish people have always lived, and are indigenous.

I do not need any legal immunity, so it would be most sensible for me to claim political asylum (and a permanent UN passport if necessary) in the Universal Old City in Jerusalem, because there is no doubt whatsoever that:

a) my Mediterranean identity was completely… erased etc etc

b) I do not need anyone else’s ‘permission’ including that of other Jewish people (I have already lived that shifting ‘White Line’ of at the ‘convenience’ of others too) to be Jewish and return to and live in the Mediterranean Universal old City of Jerusalem.

I would not personally mind having a tent in the Old City in Jerusalem, like I had a tent in Parliament Square, Central London.

The UN do not have any legal grounds to deny my claiming political asylum in the Old City in Jerusalem to establish my ‘right of return’.

Jewish people have an established legal right to live around the Mediterranean including in a state that is not just ‘European’/’Arabic’/’Muslim’/’North African’ that also helps make the global transition to clean renewable energy which can bring greater personal autonomy for people, peaceful.

There is only one Jewish State on the Mediterranean and in the world that is not contingent on Balfour or Zionism, that also controversially practices adoption, that has seen people like myself with a Mediterranean identity excluded.

It’s the old White Line that I lived in Whites Only Australia:

The Israeli and Palestinian politicians cannot deny that my Mediterranean identity was… already completely…. erased by adoption, so I do have the right to… choose to be Jewish and live in the Universal Old City in Jerusalem without needing the permission of anyone else, including another Jewish person.

My personal view is that if there was genuine… freedom of religion around the Mediterranean which there has never been, people might be quite surprised by just how many people… choose to be Jewish.

A… Mediterranean identity has been overlooked for centuries by the competing political language of European or Arabic/North African, and indeed Palestinian politicians know Muslim Arabs lived in the Iberian Peninsula and still do, so there cannot be discrimination against one Jewish State on the Mediterranean where Jewish people have always lived, that is the only one in the world.

There is obviously a long way to go to genuinely improve vulnerable children, and women’s rights not only around the Mediterranean, but elsewhere.

________________________________

The legal reality is only legally reviewable custody arrangements until adulthood are legally permissible, so ALL states have a duty of care to ALL vulnerable children in ‘out-of-home’ care, which should improve outcomes for all vulnerable children with responsible adult carers who don’t cross the boundaries of being carers with… manipulative ‘make-believe’ worlds of legally unenforceable identities and ‘families’.

************************************

*****************

I have literally been… forced against my will, to live the life of a conversa in our times.

The fundamental legal point is… discretionary legal power, to impose adoption, does not exist, and cannot be changed by anyone.

__________

Tucker v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] EWHC 3019 (Admin) (30 November 2007)

(I was correct not to concede legislation that had to be repealed because of my Mothers Day lawsuits)

Haw & Anor v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2007] EWHC 2960 (Admin) (12 December 2007)

(A ‘landmark’ alleged ‘Contempt of Court’ case where the government changed the infinitive a in legislation to purport they could keep just our case out of the High Court after another court refused to keep an accurate and contemporaneous record of legal proceedings, including that explained why I was illegally denied legal representation)

Haw, R (on the application of) v Southwark Crown Court & Ors [2009] EWHC 379 (Admin) (03 March 2009)

The government ‘sidestepped’ what was said between an HH Judge Rivlin and a government brief, when you guessed it, I was on the witness stand (before the government literally spent years trying to refuse to hand over the court recording because it was more than a mere ‘sidestep’ that took place)

_________________

02.06.2011 INDEPENDENT: Peace in our Time ? U.K’S most famous resistance passes ten year milestone.

“…When the press backed the war in Iraq, when both sides of the house backed the war in Iraq, Brian stood up to the Government,” she [Tucker] says. Pink Dr Martens and 40 arrests notwithstanding, she has an easy-going charm…she and Mr Haw have been dragged to and from police cells and the courts in increasingly ‘complex’ attempts by the authorities to get rid of them…On 9 May, the latest court case…was pushed back to October. She is currently concerned about new legislation outlawing 24-hour protest. It would not be the first law [bought and paid for corporate legislation] seemingly tailor- made to evict them. If they are moved on, where would she go? “You can move us on, but to where? You’d have to bury our bodies. Either you believe in democracy, or you don’t. We are living it ” (Independent Newspaper)

I obviously did not voluntarily return from my own home in France in July 2019, to Australia, which was when Johnson became the PM in the UK, with the obvious help of… Australian politicians.

My boyfriend Neil Kerslake who was born in Wales died after he was forced to claim political asylum (which he had never wanted to do) while he was seriously ill in the Netherlands in August 2020 (while I was illegally being held in hotel quarantine in Melbourne, because it had absolutely no legal oversight whatsoever). He was an EU citizen, who was made while seriously ill, and during a global pandemic !! to go to Ter Apel refugee centre, who did not have… the medical facilities to look after him.

The recent temporary suspension of what are called ‘intercountry’ adoptions by Sweden and the Netherlands (many states do not have, keep and have never cared about accurate and contemporaneous records to even distinguish whether or not an adoption is national or international) does not recognize that all adoptions are ‘void ab initio’.

Kind Regards,

Donna Bugat (formerly known as Babs Tucker)